Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients receiving hemorrhoidectomy using Harmonic Scalpel™, bipolar scissors, and the conventional scissors excision–ligation technique. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with irreducible prolapsing piles were randomly assigned to receive 1) Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy using scissors excision–ligation technique or 2) bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy and Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy. Neither the patient nor the independent assessor were aware of the technique used at operation. Patients were followed up at 4 and 12 weeks after operation. The measured outcomes included 1) operation time; 2) blood loss; 3) postoperative hospital stay; 4) pain score; 5) pain expectation score; 6) date of first bowel movement; 7) number of pethidine injections; 8) number of dologesic tablets taken; 9) time off work or normal activity; 10) wound healing; 11) satisfaction score; and 12) postoperative complications, including anal stenosis and fecal or flatus incontinence. RESULTS: There was no difference among the three groups in the operation time, hospital stay, pain expectation score, day of first bowel movement, number of dologesic tablets taken, time off work or normal activity, wound healing, and satisfaction score. The complication rate also did not differ in the three groups. Both Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy and bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy were superior to Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in terms of reduced blood loss. Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy had the best pain score when compared with bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, and patients required significantly less pethidine injection after Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy than after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Although the time required to return to work or normal activity remained similar, patients after Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy had the best satisfaction score among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The study shows that Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy is as good as bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy in terms of reduced blood loss but is superior because it is associated with less postoperative pain and hence, better patient satisfaction. However, these observed benefits are small, and the time off work or normal activity remains similar.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
HM MacRae RS McLeod (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: Dis Colon Rectum 38 687–694
J Golighten NG Graham CG Cleark IT De Dohmal G Giles (1969) ArticleTitleThe value of stretching the anal sphincter in the relief of post-haemorrhoidectomy pain. Br J Surg 56 859–861
GL Walker ND Nigro (1959) ArticleTitlePostoperative anorectal hemorrhage. Surg Clin North Am 39 1655–1660
JW Milsom WP Mazier (1986) ArticleTitleClassification and management of post-surgical anal stenosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163 1–5
ET Milligan C Morgan LF Naughton Jones RR Officer (1937) ArticleTitleSurgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 11 1119–1124
AG Parks (1956) ArticleTitleThe surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 43 337–351
JA Ferguson JR Heaton (1959) ArticleTitleClosed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2 176–179
J Lentini J Leveron C Taure (1990) ArticleTitleTwenty-five years experience with the high frequency transistorised loop with special reference to haemorrhoidectomy without suture. Coloproctology 4 239–249
F Seow-Choen YH Ho HG Ang HS Goh (1992) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 35 1165–1169
BT Andrews GT Layer BT Jackson RJ Nicholls (1993) ArticleTitleRandomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation. Dis Colon Rectum 36 580–583
JJ Tan F Seow-Choen (2001) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized trial comparing diathermy, and Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44 677–679
S Khan SE Pawlak JC Eggenberger (2001) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of hemorrhoids: Dis Colon Rectum 44 845–849
FC Cheng DW Shum GB Ong (1981) ArticleTitleThe treatment of second degree haemorrhoids by injection, rubber band ligation, maximal anal dilatation, and haemorrhoidectomy: Aust N Z J Surg 51 458–462
EA Carapeti MA Kamm PJ McDonald RK Phillips (1998) ArticleTitleDouble-blind randomized controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 351 169–172
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, C.C., Ha, J.P., Tai, Y.P. et al. Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Comparing Harmonic Scalpel™ Hemorrhoidectomy, Bipolar Scissors Hemorrhoidectomy, and Scissors Excision. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 789–794 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6299-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6299-5