Abstract
PURPOSE: Elective laparoscopic-assisted resection of terminal ileal Crohn’s disease is slowly gaining acceptance as an alternative to conventional surgery, based on the advantages of earlier return of bowel function, reductions in length of stay, and smaller wounds in a population likely to require reoperation. There is limited documentation of the cost-effectiveness of this approach, particularly with the reported longer operating times. The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open resections for terminal ileal Crohn’s disease. METHODS: We compared contemporaneous cohorts of patients undergoing initial elective laparoscopic or open resection for ileocecal Crohn’s disease between June 1, 1999 and October 31, 2000 at a single institution. Operative approach was at the discretion of the surgeon. Data collected included age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, indication for surgery, morbidity, mortality, conversion (laparoscopic-resection group only), operating-room time, length of hospital stay, direct cost per case, 30-day readmission, and return to work. All data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges. Data analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test where appropriate. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 45 evaluable patients (laparoscopic-resection group, 21; open-resection group, 24). One procedure was considered a conversion because of the 13-cm incision required to exteriorize the phlegmon (conversion rate, 4.8 percent). The median age (laparoscopic-resection group, 31 years; open-resection group, 39 years) and gender distributions (male/female: laparoscopic-resection group, 12/9; open-resection group, 9/15) were significantly different between the two groups. Resumption of oral intake (operating-room day vs. second postoperative day; P < 0.05) and resumption of intestinal function (2 vs. 4 days; P < 0.05) were significantly faster in the laparoscopic-resection patients. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic-resection patients (3 (2–3) vs. 5 (4–6) days; P < 0.05). The 30-day readmission rate in the laparoscopic-resection group was 9.6 percent (2/21), whereas none of the open-resection patients required rehospitalization. The overall complication rates were comparable for the laparoscopic-resection and open-resection patients (14.3 vs. 16.7 percent; P not significant), although there was one anastomotic leak and one intra-abdominal abscess in the laparoscopic-resection group, requiring readmission and reintervention (9.6 percent; P not significant). The direct cost per case was significantly lower for the laparoscopic-resection group ($2,547 vs. $2,985; P < 0.05, Student’s t-test). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic-assisted approach to ileocecal Crohn’s disease results in a shortened length of stay and seems economically advantageous to open surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BB Crohn L Ginzburg GD Oppenheimer (1932) ArticleTitleRegional ileitis JAMA 99 1323–1329
VW Fazio AH Aufses SuffixJr (1999) ArticleTitleEvolution of surgery for Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 42 979–988
EH Phillips M Franklin BJ Carroll MJ Fallas R Ramos D Rosenthal (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy Ann Surg 216 703–707
CM Schlachta J Mamazza PA Seshadri M Cadeddu EC Poulin (2000) ArticleTitleDeterminants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 14 258–263
J Canin-Endres B Salky F Gattorno M Edye (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic assisted intestinal resection in 88 patients with Crohn’s disease Surg Endosc 13 595–599
K Singh A Prasad JH Saunders RJ Foley (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy in the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 8 39–46
TC Sardinha SD Wexner (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease World J Surg 22 370–374
WA Bemelman JF Slors MS Dunker et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease Surg Endosc 14 721–725
MS Dunker AM Stiggelbout RA van Hogezand J Ringers G Griffioen WA Bemelman (1998) ArticleTitleQuality of life, cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease Surg Endosc 12 1334–1340
WA Bemelman WJ van der Made EJ Mulder J Ringers RA van Hogezand (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery in Crohn’s disease Neth J Med 50 19–22
JS Wu EH Birnbaum IJ Kodner RD Fry TE Read JW Fleshman (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn’s disease Surgery 122 682–689
JJ Bauer MT Harris NM Grumbach SR Gorfine (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 38 712–715
D Kishi R Nezu T Ito (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted surgery for Crohn’s disease Surg Today 30 219–222
AS Krupnick JB Morris (2000) ArticleTitleThe long-term results of resection and multiple resections in Crohn’s disease Semin Gastrointest Dis 11 41–51
RG Farmer G Whelan VW Fazio (1985) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of patients with Crohn’s disease. Relationship between the clinical pattern and prognosis Gastroenterology 88 1818–1825
JG Williams WD Wong DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg (1991) ArticleTitleRecurrence of Crohn’s disease after resection Br J Surg 78 10–19
MR Lock RG Farmer VW Fazio DG Jagelman IC Lavery FL Weakley (1981) ArticleTitleRecurrence and reoperation for Crohn’s disease. A role of disease location in prognosis N Engl J Med 304 1586–1588
M Watanabe M Ohgami T Teramoto T Hibi M Kitajima (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease associated with intestinal stenosis and ileorectal fistula Surg Today 29 446–448
WA Bemelman RA van Hogezand WJ Meijeringk G Griffioen J Ringers (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted bowel resections in inflammatory bowel disease Neth J Med 53 39–46
O Alabaz AJ Iroatulam A Nessim EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease Eur J Surg 166 213–217
U Hildebrandt T Schiedeck D Kreissler-Haag (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoskopisch assistierte chirurgie bei M. Crohn Zentralbl Chir 123 357–361
JW Milsom KA Hammerhofer B Bohm P Marcello P Elson VW Fazio (2001) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 44 1–9
P Reissman BA Salky J Pfeifer M Edye DG Jagelman SD Wexner (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease Am J Surg 171 47–51
KA Ludwig JW Milsom JM Church VW Fazio (1996) ArticleTitlePreliminary experience with laparoscopic intestinal surgery for Crohn’s disease Am J Surg 171 52–56
JJ Bauer MT Harris NM Grumbach SR Gorfine (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease. Which patients are good candidates? J Clin Gastroenterol 23 44–46
CD Liu R Rolandelli SW Ashley B Evans M Shin DW McFadden (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease Am Surg 61 1054–1056
SD Wexner ID Moscovitz (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s disease Surg Clin North Am 80 1299–1319
A Jawhari MA Kamm C Ong A Forbes CI Bartram PR Hawley (1998) ArticleTitleIntra-abdominal and pelvic abscess in Crohn’s disease Br J Surg 85 367–371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Duepree, HJ., Senagore, A.J., Delaney, C.P. et al. Advantages of Laparoscopic Resection for Ileocecal Crohn’s Disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 605–610 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6253-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6253-6