Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accuracy of Investigations for Asymptomatic Colorectal Liver Metastases

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of the most promising imaging and tumor marker tests in liver metastasis diagnosis on follow-up of asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients during a median of 57 months after primary tumor resection. METHODS: One hundred patients, who were considered free of liver metastases after primary colorectal cancer resection and conventional follow-up, were screened for liver metastases by computerized tomography, magnetic resonance and ultrasound scans, ultrasound Doppler and isotope assessment of changes in hepatic arterial and portal venous flow, and serum estimation of carcinoembryonic antigen. Patients were followed up during a median of 41 months to identify those who developed liver metastases. RESULTS: The most sensitive technique was computerized tomography (sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.91). Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance but not ultrasound were 100 percent accurate in differentiating liver metastases from other hepatic lesions. Techniques based on changes in hepatic arterial and portal venous flow had lower diagnostic accuracies (Doppler perfusion index, sensitivity 0.58, specificity 0.57; hepatic perfusion index, sensitivity 0.50, specificity 0.55), whereas ultrasound scanning identified only 43 percent (sensitivity 0.43, specificity 0.96) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen 33 percent (sensitivity 0.33, specificity 0.81) of patients with asymptomatic liver metastasis. Sensitivity could be improved by using tests in combination but this reduced specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized tomography was the most sensitive test for asymptomatic colorectal liver metastases, but only 67 percent of affected patients were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B Greenway (1988) ArticleTitleHepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: Br J Surg 75 513–519

    Google Scholar 

  2. S Earlam G Glover C Fordy D Burke TG Allen-Mersh (1996) ArticleTitleRelation between tumour size, quality of life and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 14 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  3. R Stangl A Altendorf-Hofman RM Charnley J Scheele (1994) ArticleTitleFactors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastases. Lancet 343 1405–1410

    Google Scholar 

  4. L Weiss E Grundmann J Torhorst et al. (1986) ArticleTitleHaematogenous metastatic patterns in colonic carcinoma: J Pathol 150 195–203

    Google Scholar 

  5. DA August RT Ottow PH Sugarbaker (1984) ArticleTitleClinical perspectives of human colorectal cancer metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 3 303–324

    Google Scholar 

  6. E Mayhew D Glaves (1984) ArticleTitleQuantitation of tumorigenic disseminating and arrested cancer cells. Br J Cancer 50 159–166

    Google Scholar 

  7. TG Allen-Mersh S Earlam C Fordy K Abrams J Houghton (1994) ArticleTitleQuality of life and survival with continuous hepatic-artery floxuridine infusion for colorectal liver metastases. Lancet 344 1255–1260

    Google Scholar 

  8. D Schoemaker R Black L Giles J Toouli (1998) ArticleTitleYearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 114 211–213

    Google Scholar 

  9. M Rosen L Chan RW Beart SuffixJr P Vukasin G Anthone (1998) ArticleTitleFollow-up of colorectal cancer: Dis Colon Rectum 41 1116–1126

    Google Scholar 

  10. TG Allen-Mersh (1991) ArticleTitleImproving survival after large bowel cancer: BMJ 303 595–596

    Google Scholar 

  11. TJ Smith MM Kemeny PH Sugarbaker et al. (1982) ArticleTitleA prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of metastatic disease. Ann Surg 195 486–491

    Google Scholar 

  12. O Matsui T Takashima M Kadoya et al. (1987) ArticleTitleLiver metastases from colorectal cancers: Radiology 165 65–69

    Google Scholar 

  13. BA Ward DJ Miller JA Frank et al. (1989) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of hepatic imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases: Surgery 105 180–187

    Google Scholar 

  14. JL Chezmar WM Rumancik AJ Megibow DH Hulnick RC Nelson ME Bernardino (1988) ArticleTitleLiver and abdominal screening in patients with cancer: Radiology 168 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  15. JT Ferrucci (1986) ArticleTitleMR imaging of the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147 1103–1116

    Google Scholar 

  16. K Wernecke E Rummeny G Bongartz et al. (1991) ArticleTitleDetection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: AJR Am J Roentgenol 157 731–739

    Google Scholar 

  17. IG Finlay DR Meek HW Gray et al. (1982) ArticleTitleIncidence and detection of occult hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer. BMJ 284 803–805

    Google Scholar 

  18. MM Paul JG Blomjous MA Cuesta S Meijer (1996) ArticleTitlePrognostic value of negative intraoperative ultrasonography in primary colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 83 1741–1743

    Google Scholar 

  19. E Leen WJ Angerson P O’Gorman TG Cooke CS McArdle (1996) ArticleTitleIntraoperative ultrasound in colorectal cancer patients undergoing apparently curative surgery: Clin Radiol 51 157–159

    Google Scholar 

  20. E Leen WJ Angerson H Wotherspoon B Moule TG Cooke CS McArdle (1994) ArticleTitleComparison of the Doppler perfusion index and intraoperative ultrasonography in diagnosing colorectal liver metastases: Ann Surg 220 663–667

    Google Scholar 

  21. SH Leveson PA Wiggins GR Giles A Parkin PJ Robinson (1985) ArticleTitleDeranged liver blood flow patterns in the detection of liver metastases. Br J Surg 72 128–130

    Google Scholar 

  24. A Parkin PJ Robinson P Baxter S Leveson P Wiggins GR Giles (1983) ArticleTitleLiver perfusion scintigraphy method, normal range and laparotomy correlation in 100 patients. Nucl Med Commun 4 395–402

    Google Scholar 

  25. N Wolmark HS Wieand HE Rockette et al. (1983) ArticleTitleThe prognostic significance of tumor location and bowel obstruction in Dukes B and C colorectal cancer: Ann Surg 198 743–752

    Google Scholar 

  26. BD Minsky C Mies TA Rich A Recht (1989) ArticleTitleLymphatic vessel invasion is an independent prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17 311–318

    Google Scholar 

  27. PA Kane V Ayton HL Walters et al. (1997) ArticleTitleMnDPDP-enhanced MR imaging of the liver. Acta Radiol 38 650–654

    Google Scholar 

  28. N Takeuchi JM Ramirez NJ Mortensen R Cobb T Whittlestone (1996) ArticleTitleIntraoperative ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hepatic metastases during surgery for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 11 92–95

    Google Scholar 

  29. DM Hemingway TG Cooke SJ Grime et al. (1991) ArticleTitleChanges in hepatic haemodynamics and the hepatic perfusion index during the growth and development of hypovascular HSN sarcoma in rats. Br J Surg 78 362–370

    Google Scholar 

  30. K Oppo E Leen WJ Angerson TG Cooke CS McArdle (1998) ArticleTitleDoppler perfusion index: Radiology 208 453–457

    Google Scholar 

  31. RC Fowler KM Harris SE Swift M Ward DC Greenwood (1998) ArticleTitleHepatic Doppler perfusion index: Radiology 209 867–871

    Google Scholar 

  32. DM Hemingway G McCurrach RG Bessent JH Mckillop TG Cooke (1991) ArticleTitleDynamic hepatic scintigraphy: Nucl Med Commun 12 811–816

    Google Scholar 

  33. HW Warren H Gallagher DM Hemingway et al. (1998) ArticleTitleProspective assessment of the hepatic perfusion index in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 85 1708–1712

    Google Scholar 

  34. CG Moertel TR Fleming JS Macdonald DG Haller JA Laurie C Tangen (1993) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test for monitoring patients with resected colon cancer. JAMA 270 943–947

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Department of Radiology, Kings College Hospital, and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom

    C. Glover M.A., P. Douse, P. Kane F.R.C.R., J. Karani F.R.C.R., H. Meire F.R.C.R., S. Mohammadtaghi M.Sc. & T. G. Allen-Mersh M.D.

Authors
  1. C. Glover M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Douse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Kane F.R.C.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Karani F.R.C.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Meire F.R.C.R.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Mohammadtaghi M.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. G. Allen-Mersh M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Glover, C., Douse, P., Kane, P. et al. Accuracy of Investigations for Asymptomatic Colorectal Liver Metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 476–484 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6224-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6224-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation