Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Genetic Alterations Between Microsatellite Instability-Positive and Microsatellite Instability-Negative Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas in Patients Younger than 40 Years Old

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many studies have demonstrated that sporadic microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancers share several clinicopathologic features with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers, including right-sided location, young age of onset, characteristic histomorphologic features, and a good prognosis. The aim of this study was to define distinct clinicopathologic features of sporadic microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancers and to compare genotypic characteristics between microsatellite instability–positive and microsatellite instability–negative colorectal cancers in a young group. METHODS: We analyzed 61 cases of young patients (<40 years old) with colorectal cancers for microsatellite instability at five mononucleotide and three dinucleotide repeats, loss of heterozygosity at APC and DCC, and K-ras and p53 mutations. Microsatellite instability status was correlated with molecular genetic factors and clinicopathologic parameters. RESULTS: Microsatellite instability positivity was detected in 19 (31.1 percent) of 61 cases. Allelic alterations in TGFβRII, BAX, and IGFIIR were observed exclusively in microsatellite instability–positive tumors (63.1, 26.3, and 26.3 percent, respectively). Microsatellite instability–positive tumors exhibited a lower frequency of the p53 mutation (10.5 percent) than microsatellite instability–negative tumors (47.6 percent; P < 0.05). However, microsatellite instability status was not associated with APC or DCC allelic deletion or with the K-ras mutation. Microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancers exhibited a proclivity toward proximal location, expansive growth pattern, and large tumor size (P < 0.05). Microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancers had lower preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels (P < 0.05), a less advanced stage at presentation (P < 0.05), and a tendency toward better prognosis (P = 0.051) than microsatellite instability–negative colorectal cancers. However, there was no difference between microsatellite instability–positive and microsatellite instability–negative colorectal cancers regarding gross features, tumor grade, and extracellular mucin production. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that sporadic microsatellite instability–positive colorectal cancers in young patients have different histomorphologic features from microsatellite instability–negative colorectal cancers and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers, some overlap of genetic alterations on multistep carcinogenesis with microsatellite instability–negative colorectal cancers, and a tendency for better prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H Kim J Jen B Vogelstein SR Hamilton (1994) ArticleTitleClinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences Am J Pathol 145 148–156

    Google Scholar 

  2. LA Aaltonen R Salovaara P Kristo et al. (1998) ArticleTitleIncidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease N Engl J Med 338 1481–1487

    Google Scholar 

  3. HT Lynch TC Smyrk P Watson et al. (1993) ArticleTitleGenetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 104 1535–1549

    Google Scholar 

  4. RA Lothe P Peltomaki GI Meling et al. (1993) ArticleTitleGenomic instability in colorectal cancer Cancer Res 53 5849–5852

    Google Scholar 

  5. JM Cunningham ER Christensen DJ Tester et al. (1998) ArticleTitleHypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability Cancer Res 58 3455–3460

    Google Scholar 

  6. JG Herman A Umar K Polyak et al. (1998) ArticleTitleIncidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95 6870–6875

    Google Scholar 

  7. KW Kinzler B Vogelstein (1996) ArticleTitleLessons from hereditary colorectal cancer Cell 87 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  8. T Fujiwara JM Stolker T Watanabe et al. (1998) ArticleTitleAccumulated clonal genetic alterations in familial and sporadic colorectal carcinomas with widespread instability in microsatellite sequences Am J Pathol 153 1063–1078

    Google Scholar 

  9. SN Thibodeau AJ French JM Cunningham et al. (1998) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability in colorectal cancer Cancer Res 58 1713–1718

    Google Scholar 

  10. WS Samowitz ML Slattery (1997) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability in colorectal adenomas Gastroenterology 112 1515–1519

    Google Scholar 

  11. M Konishi R Kikuchi-Yanoshita K Tanaka et al. (1996) ArticleTitleMolecular nature of colon tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, familial polyposis, and sporadic colon cancer Gastroenterology 111 307–317

    Google Scholar 

  12. WS Samowitz ML Slattery RA Kerber (1995) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability in human colonic cancer is not a useful clinical indicator of familial colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 109 1765–1771

    Google Scholar 

  13. JC Cusack GG Giacco K Cleary et al. (1996) ArticleTitleSurvival factors in 186 patients younger than 40 years old with colorectal adenocarcinoma J Am Coll Surg 183 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  14. JG Guillem J Puig-La Calle SuffixJr C Cellini et al. (1999) ArticleTitleVarying features of early age-of-onset “sporadic” and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients Dis Colon Rectum 42 36–42

    Google Scholar 

  15. R Gryfe H Kim ET Hsieh et al. (2000) ArticleTitleTumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 342 69–77

    Google Scholar 

  16. HF Vasen JP Mecklin PM Khan HT Lynch (1991) ArticleTitleThe international collaborative group on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (ICG-HNPCC) Dis Colon Rectum 34 424–425

    Google Scholar 

  17. CR Boland SN Thibodeau SR Hamilton et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition Cancer Res 58 5248–5257

    Google Scholar 

  18. H Yamamoto H Sawai M Perucho (1997) ArticleTitleFrameshift somatic mutations in gastrointestinal cancer of the microsatellite mutator phenotype Cancer Res 57 4420–4426

    Google Scholar 

  19. J Schlegel T Bocker H Zirngibl F Hofstadter J Ruschoff (1995) ArticleTitleDetection of microsatellite instability in human colorectal carcinomas using a non-radioactive PCR-based screening technique Virchows Arch 426 223–227

    Google Scholar 

  20. B Liu SM Farrington GM Petersen et al. (1995) ArticleTitleGenetic instability occurs in the majority of young patients with colorectal cancer Nat Med 1 348–352

    Google Scholar 

  21. S Senba F Konishi T Okamoto et al. (1998) ArticleTitleClinicopathologic and genetic features of nonfamilial colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors Cancer 82 279–285

    Google Scholar 

  22. M Risio G Reato PF di Celle M Fizzotti FP Rossini R Foa (1996) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability is associated with the histological features of the tumor in nonfamilial colorectal cancer Cancer Res 56 5470–5474

    Google Scholar 

  23. JR Jass KA Do LA Simms et al. (1998) ArticleTitleMorphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication error Gut 42 673–679

    Google Scholar 

  24. S Forster HP Sattler M Hack et al. (1998) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability in sporadic carcinomas of the proximal colon Surgery 123 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  25. H Kim JK Jung JH Park C Park (1996) ArticleTitleImmunohistochemical characteristics of colorectal carcinoma with DNA replication errors J Korean Med Sci 11 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  26. CP Stanners L DeMarte M Rojas P Gold A Fuks (1995) ArticleTitleOpposite functions for two classes of genes of the human carcinoembryonic antigen family Tumour Biol 16 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  27. RH Fletcher (1986) ArticleTitleCarcinoembryonic antigen Ann Intern Med 104 66–73

    Google Scholar 

  28. A Hemminki JP Mecklin H Jarvinen LA Aaltonen H Joensuu (2000) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite instability is a favourable prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy Gastroenterology 119 921–928

    Google Scholar 

  29. M Ilyas IP Tomlinson MR Novelli A Hanby WF Bodmer IC Talbot (1996) ArticleTitleClinicopathological features and p53 expression in left-sided sporadic colorectal cancers with and without microsatellite instability J Pathol 179 370–375

    Google Scholar 

  30. M Toyota N Ahuja M Ohe-Toyota JG Herman SB Baylin JP Isaa (1999) ArticleTitleCpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96 8681–8686

    Google Scholar 

  31. I Tomlinson M Ilyas V Johnson et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA comparison of the genetic pathways involved in the pathogenesis of three types of colorectal cancer J Pathol 184 148–152

    Google Scholar 

  32. BJ Iacopetta J Welch R Soong AK House XP Zhou R Hamelin (1998) ArticleTitleMutation of the transforming growth factor-type II receptor gene in right-sided colorectal cancer J Pathol 184 390–395

    Google Scholar 

  33. S Salahshor U Kressner L Pahlman B Glimelius G Lindmark A Lindbolm (1999) ArticleTitleColorectal cancer with and without microsatellite instability involves different genes Gene Chromosome Cancer 26 247–252

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Suh, J.H., Lim, SD., Kim, J.C. et al. Comparison of Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Genetic Alterations Between Microsatellite Instability-Positive and Microsatellite Instability-Negative Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas in Patients Younger than 40 Years Old. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 219–228 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6152-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6152-x

Keywords

Navigation