Skip to main content
Log in

Mobilization of the Rectum

Anatomic Concepts and the Bookshelf Revisited

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sound surgical technique is based on accurate anatomic knowledge. In surgery for cancer, the anatomy of the perirectal fascia and the retrorectal plane is the basis for correct mobilization of the rectum to ensure clear surgical margins and to minimize the risk of local recurrence. METHODS: This review of the literature on the perirectal fascia is based on a translation of the original description by Thoma Jonnesco and a later account by Wilhelm Waldeyer. The Jonnesco description, first published in 1896 in French, is compared with the German account of 1899. These were critically analyzed in the context of our own and other techniques of mobilizing the rectum. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization of the rectum for cancer can be performed along anatomic planes with minimal blood loss, preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves and a low prevalence of local recurrence. Different techniques including total mesorectal excision are based on the same anatomic principles, however, popular words have been used to replace accepted, established terminology. In particular, the description of total mesorectal excision has been confusing because of its emphasis on the words “total” and “mesorectum.” The use of the word “mesorectum” anatomically is inaccurate and the implication that total excision of all the perirectal fat contained within the perirectal fascia “en bloc” in all patients with rectal cancer will minimize local recurrence remains contentious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EL Bokey B Öjerskog PH Chapuis OF Dent RC Newland G Sinclair (1999) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence after curative excision of the rectum for cancer without adjuvant therapy: Br J Surg 86 1164–1170

    Google Scholar 

  2. P Quirke P Durdey MF Dixon NS Williams (1986) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of internal tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2 996–999

    Google Scholar 

  3. GA Porter CL Soskoline WW Yakimets SC Newman (1998) ArticleTitleSurgeon-related factors and outcomes in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 227 157–167

    Google Scholar 

  4. CS McArdle D Hole (1991) ArticleTitleImpact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. BMJ 302 1501–1505

    Google Scholar 

  5. EL Bokey PH Chapuis OF Dent et al. (1997) ArticleTitleFactors affecting survival after excision of the rectum for cancer: Dis Colon Rectum 40 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. H Kessler P Hermanek (1998) ArticleTitleOutcomes in rectal cancer surgery are directly related to technical factors. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 9 247–253

    Google Scholar 

  7. D Gerota (1895) ArticleTitleDie lymphgefässe des rectums und des anus. Archive für Anatomie und Physiologie. Anatomische Abtheilung 9 240–256

    Google Scholar 

  8. AR Crapp AM Cuthbertson (1974) ArticleTitleThe Bookshelf—William Waldeyer and the rectosacral fascia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 138 252–256

    Google Scholar 

  9. RC Newland OF Dent PH Chapuis EL Bokey (1993) ArticleTitleClinicopathologically diagnosed residual tumour after resection of colorectal cancer. A 20-year prospective study. Cancer 72 1636–1642

    Google Scholar 

  10. KW Chan J Boey SK Wong (1985) ArticleTitleA method of reporting radial invasion and surgical clearance of rectal carcinoma. Histopathology 9 1319–1327

    Google Scholar 

  11. GL Hill M Rafique (1998) ArticleTitleExtrafascial excision of the rectum for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85 809–812

    Google Scholar 

  12. JM Church PJ Raudkivi GL Hill (1987) ArticleTitleThe surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular relevance of the hazards of rectal mobilization. Int J Colorectal Dis 2 158–166

    Google Scholar 

  13. K Havenga MC De Ruiter WE Enker K Welvaart (1996) ArticleTitleAnatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83 384–388

    Google Scholar 

  14. IP Bissett KY Chau GL Hill (2000) ArticleTitleExtrafascial excision of the rectum: Dis Colon Rectum 43 903–910

    Google Scholar 

  15. HW Maunsell (1892) ArticleTitleA new method of excising the two upper portions of the rectum and the lower segment of the sigmoid flexure of the colon. Lancet 2 473–476

    Google Scholar 

  16. RJ Heald BJ Moran RD Rydall R Sexton JK MacFarlane (1998) ArticleTitleRectal cancer—the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133 894–899

    Google Scholar 

  17. PJ Morgado (1998) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision: Dis Colon Rectum 41 120–121

    Google Scholar 

  18. WE Enker HT Thaler ML Cranor T Polyak (1995) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181 335–346

    Google Scholar 

  19. E Tiret M Pocard (1999) ArticleTitleExérèse totale du mesorectum et conservation de l’innervation à destinée génito-urinaire dans la chirurgie du cancer du rectum. Ann Chir 53 507–514

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y Moriya K Sugihara T Akasu S Fujita (1995) ArticleTitleNerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced low rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 31 1229–1232

    Google Scholar 

  21. M Killingback P Barron OF Dent (2001) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 44 473–486

    Google Scholar 

  22. S Zaheer JH Pemberton R Farouk RR Dozois BG Wolf D Ilstrup (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 227 800–811

    Google Scholar 

  23. ND Karanjia AP Corder P Bearn RJ Heald (1994) ArticleTitleLeakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81 1224–1226

    Google Scholar 

  24. PH Hainsworth MJ Egan WJ Cunliffe (1997) ArticleTitleEvaluation of a policy of total mesorectal excision for rectal and rectosigmoid cancers. Br J Surg 84 652–656

    Google Scholar 

  25. E Carlsen E Schlichting I Guldvog E Johnson RJ Heald (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85 526–529

    Google Scholar 

  26. F Lopez-Kostner IC Lavery GR Hool LA Rybicki VW Fazio (1998) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision is not necessary for cancers of the upper rectum. Surgery 124 612–618

    Google Scholar 

  27. N Scott P Jackson T Al-Jaberi MF Dixon P Quirke PH Finan (1995) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision and local recurrence: Br J Surg 82 1031–1033

    Google Scholar 

  28. JV Reynolds WP Joyce J Dolan K Sheahan JM Hyland (1996) ArticleTitlePathological evidence in support of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83 1112–1115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Chapuis, P., Bokey, L., Fahrer, M. et al. Mobilization of the Rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1–8 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6104-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6104-5

Keywords

Navigation