Skip to main content
Log in

Colonic J-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Handsewn vs. Stapled Anastomosis

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis performed after complete proctectomy and total mesorectal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum can be handsewn or stapled. Stapling the coloanal anastomosis is believed to shorten operating time and reduce morbidity, but there are no randomized trials comparing the techniques.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and May 2001, all patients with rectal adenocarcinoma requiring total mesorectal excision were randomized intraoperatively to handsewn or stapled anastomosis. Mortality, intraoperative, and postoperative findings and functional results at 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (12 females; mean age, 60 ± 10 years) were randomized (stapled group: n = 20; handsewn group: n = 17). The two groups were comparable for age, gender, distance between the tumor and the levator ani, tumor volume, and use of preoperative radiotherapy (3 in each group). Morbidity did not differ between stapled group (3/20) and handsewn group (4/17; P > 0.05). Mean ± standard deviation operative time was shorter in stapled group (261 ± 40 minutes) than in handsewn group (314 ± 46 minutes; P = 0.0008), and median distance between the anastomosis and the anal verge was shorter in handsewn group (19 ± 9 mm) than in stapled group (27 ± 8 mm; P = 0.01). Three patients of handsewn group and none of stapled group developed an anastomotic stricture requiring a single digital dilation (not significant). Number of stools per 24 hours, urgency, incidence of fragmented stools, degree of continence, requirement for protective pad, and/or need to take medication at 3, 6, and 12 months were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled coloanal anastomosis is significantly faster than handsewn CAA and has similar functional results. It should be the preferred technique when it is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. AG Parks JP Percy (1982) ArticleTitleResection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma Br J Surg 69 301–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2B3cjjtlw%3D Occurrence Handle7082951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. F Lazorthes P Fages P Chiotasso J Lemozy E Bloom (1986) ArticleTitleResection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 73 136–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC3s3jslI%3D Occurrence Handle3947904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. R Parc E Tiret P Frileux E Moszkowski J Loygue (1986) ArticleTitleResection and coloanal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma Br J Surg 73 139–41 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC3s3jslM%3D Occurrence Handle3947905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. H Ortiz De M Miguel P Armendariz J Rodriguez C Chocarro (1995) ArticleTitleColoanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 38 375–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB3snos1c%3D Occurrence Handle7720443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. F Seow-Choen HS Goh (1995) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction Br J Surg 82 608–10 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3sfms1I%3D Occurrence Handle7613927

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O Hallbook L Pahlman M Krog SD Wexner R Sjodahl (1996) ArticleTitleRandomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection Ann Surg 224 58–65 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199607000-00009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1cbkslM%3D Occurrence Handle8678619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. F Lazorthes P Chiotasso RA Gamagami G Istvan S Muhammed (1997) ArticleTitleLate clinical outcome in a randomised prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis Br J Surg 84 1449–51 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2168.1997.00578.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FislKrsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9361611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RJ Heald EM Husband RD Ryall (1982) ArticleTitleThe mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery – the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69 613–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyD38zpsVU%3D Occurrence Handle6751457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. N Dehni DA McNamara RD Schlegel M Guiguet E Tiret R Parc (2002) ArticleTitleClinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 45 1635–40 Occurrence Handle12473887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3crnsVw%3D Occurrence Handle8416784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. K Ogan Y Lotan K Koeneman MS Pearle JA Cadeddu J Rassweiler (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a cost analysis J Urol 168 1945–9 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005392-200211000-00012 Occurrence Handle12394682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. RA Dakkuri DJ Ludwig LW Traverso (2002) ArticleTitleShould bilateral inguinal hernias be repaired during one operation? Am J Surg 183 554–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00838-3 Occurrence Handle12034392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. NS Williams (1984) ArticleTitleThe rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer Br J Surg 71 575–81 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuB2MfivFU%3D Occurrence Handle6378308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. NJ Mortensen JM Ramirez N Takeuchi MM Humphreys (1995) ArticleTitleColonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome Br J Surg 82 611–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3sfms1M%3D Occurrence Handle7613928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. WT Reilly JH Pemberton BG Wolff et al. (1997) ArticleTitleRandomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa Ann Surg 225 666–77 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199706000-00004 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2svjsFw%3D Occurrence Handle9230807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Tiret M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Laurent, A., Parc, Y., McNamara, D. et al. Colonic J-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Handsewn vs. Stapled Anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 729–734 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0829-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0829-z

Key words

Navigation