Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis Strongly Reduces Anastomotic Leak Rates in Crohn’s Disease Surgery

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

Anastomotic configuration may influence anastomotic leak rates. The aim of this study was to determine whether a side-to-side stapled ileocolonic anastomosis produces lower anastomotic leak rates than those with a handsewn end-to-end ileocolonic anastomosis after ileocecal or ileocolonic resection for Crohn’s disease.

METHODS

A series of 122 consecutive patients underwent elective ileocecal or ileocolonic resection with ileocolonic anastomosis for Crohn’s disease from January 1998 to June 2003: 71 had handsewn end-to-end anastomosis and 51 had side-to-side stapled anastomosis. The choice between the two anastomoses was left to the surgeon’s preference. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess if there was any difference in anastomotic leak rates.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, preoperative presence of abscess or fistula, history of smoking, and albumin levels. More patients were taking steroids in the handsewn group than in the stapled group. In the handsewn group there were 10 anastomotic leaks (14.1 percent) and in the stapled group there was 1 anastomotic leak (2.0 percent) (risk difference, +12.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7–22.2; P = 0.02). Anastomotic configuration was the sole variable that influenced anastomotic leak rates at univariate analysis. Mortality was 1.4 percent in the handsewn group and 0 percent in the stapled group. Complications other than anastomotic leak developed in 11 patients in the handsewn group and in 6 patients in the stapled group. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.3 days in the handsewn group and 9.7 days in the stapled group (P = 0.03). Excluding those patients who had an anastomotic leak, the difference was still present (handsewn group, 10.1 days; stapled group, 9.1 days; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Although confirmation from randomized, controlled trials is required, side-to-side stapled anastomosis seems to substantially decrease anastomotic leak rates in surgical patients with Crohn’s disease, compared with handsewn end-to-end anastomosis. Postoperative hospital stay decreased in the stapled anastomosis group, and this was not entirely a result of decreased anastomotic leak rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T Yamamoto RN Allan MR Keighley (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 43 1141–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitVSnsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10950014

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AP Meagher BG Wolff (1994) ArticleTitleRight hemicolectomy with a linear cutting stapler Dis Colon Rectum 37 1043–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD3cbit1U%3D Occurrence Handle7924714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M Muñoz-Juárez T Yamamoto BG Wolff MR Keighley (2001) ArticleTitleWide-lumen stapled anastomosis vs. conventional end-to-end anastomosis in the treatment of Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 44 20–6 Occurrence Handle11805559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A Fingerhut A Elhadad JM Hay F Lacaine Y Flamant (1994) ArticleTitleInfraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research Surgery 116 484–90 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA28%2FisFA%3D Occurrence Handle8079178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. P Frileux MA Quilichini E Tiret et al. (1988) ArticleTitleSingle-layer anastomosis in surgery of the large bowel. A prospective study on 316 cases in a university hospital Int J Colorectal Dis 3 32–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC1MbjtlE%3D Occurrence Handle3283279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. SA Curley DC Allison DE Smith RC Doberneck (1988) ArticleTitleAnalysis of techniques and results in 347 consecutive colon anastomoses Am J Surg 155 597–601 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC1c7jvVw%3D Occurrence Handle3354785

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M Cajozzo G Compagno P DiTora SI Spallitta P Bazan (1990) ArticleTitleAdvantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs. manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective study Acta Chir Scand 156 167–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB3szgtV0%3D Occurrence Handle2184635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A Elhadad (1990) ArticleTitleAnastomoses colo-rectales: à la main ou à la machine? Essai contrôlé multicentrique par tirage au sort Chirurgie 116 425–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2MnotFI%3D Occurrence Handle2096044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. R Golub RW Golub R Cantu HD Stein (1997) ArticleTitleA multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses J Am Coll Surg 184 364–72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2MrjtlA%3D Occurrence Handle9100681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M Kracht JM Hay PL Fagniez A Fingerhut (1993) ArticleTitleIleocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomised trial Int J Colorectal Dis 8 29–33 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB28%2FjtlE%3D Occurrence Handle8492040

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M Kracht (1990) ArticleTitleAnastomose colique droite manuelle ou mécanique? Chirurgie 116 415–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2MnotFA%3D Occurrence Handle2096042

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kracht (1991) ArticleTitleLe point sur les meilleures anastomoses après résection colique Ann Chir 45 295–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B1M%2FmslY%3D Occurrence Handle2064291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. P Cubertafond G Cucchiaro F Lesourd-Pontonnier A Gainant (1992) ArticleTitleComplications postopératoires précoces des résections anastomoses en chirurgie colique ou colo-rectale: analyse de 627 observations Chirurgie 118 86–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA3Mvkt1Y%3D Occurrence Handle1306432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. M Hashemi JR Novell AA Lewis (1998) ArticleTitleSide to-side stapled anastomosis may delay recurrence in Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 41 1293–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fgt1CnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9788394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. T Yamamoto IM Bain E Mylonakis RN Allan MR Keighley (1999) ArticleTitleStapled functional end-to-end anastomosis versus sutured end-to-end anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s disease Scand J Gastroenterol 34 708–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzpsVOqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10466883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K Smedh M Andersson H Johansson T Hagberg (2002) ArticleTitlePreoperative management is more important than choice of sutured or stapled anastomosis in Crohn’s disease Eur J Surg 168 154–7 Occurrence Handle12182240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. M Kusunoki H Ikeuchi H Yanagi Y Shoji T Yamamura (1998) ArticleTitleA comparison of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s disease Dig Surg 15 679–82 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fmt1WksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9845636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. S Post M Betzler B Ditfurth Particlevon G Schürmann P Küppers C Herfarth (1991) ArticleTitleRisks of intestinal anastomoses in Crohn’s disease Ann Surg 213 37–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D1M%2FkslE%3D Occurrence Handle1985536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. TM Heimann AJ Greenstein L Mechanic AH Aufses (1985) ArticleTitleEarly complications following surgical treatment for Crohn’s disease Ann Surg 201 494–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqC2cfgsFI%3D Occurrence Handle3977451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. S Fasth R Hellberg L Hultén O Magnusson (1980) ArticleTitleEarly complications after surgical treatment for Crohn’s disease with particular reference to factors affecting their development Acta Chir Scand 146 519–26 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C1c%2FgtlE%3D Occurrence Handle7223290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. GH Ballantyne (1991) ArticleTitleA victory for handsewn anastomoses [editorial]? Dis Colon Rectum 34 625–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2srmvFU%3D Occurrence Handle2055149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. H Graffner L Andersson P Lowenhielm B Walther (1984) ArticleTitleThe healing process of anastomoses of the colon: a comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 27 767–71 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqD2M%2FmslQ%3D Occurrence Handle6389049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. S Galandiuk (1998) ArticleTitleStapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s disease [editorial] Dig Surg 15 655 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7gsFWmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9890783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. AJ Dziki MD Duncan JW Harmon et al. (1991) ArticleTitleAdvantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 34 442–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2czlsFY%3D Occurrence Handle1953849

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O Hallböök K Johansson R Sjödahl (1996) ArticleTitleLaser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma—comparison between the straight and colonic j-pouch reconstruction Br J Surg 83 389–92 Occurrence Handle8665202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seventh Department of Surgery, S. Giovanni Battista Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy

    Andrea Resegotti M.D., Enzo C. Farina M.D., Giovanni Avagnina M.D., Alberto Giustetto M.D., Donata Campra M.D. & Gian Ruggero Fronda M.D.

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Marco Astegiano M.D.

  3. Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Giovannino Ciccone M.D.

Authors
  1. Andrea Resegotti M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Astegiano M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enzo C. Farina M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giovannino Ciccone M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giovanni Avagnina M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alberto Giustetto M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Donata Campra M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gian Ruggero Fronda M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Resegotti M.D..

Additional information

Published online: XX February 2005.

About this article

Cite this article

Resegotti, A., Astegiano, M., Farina, E. et al. Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis Strongly Reduces Anastomotic Leak Rates in Crohn’s Disease Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 464–468 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0786-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0786-6

Key words

Search

Navigation