Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Placement of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for the Control of Fecal Incontinence

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

BACKGROUND

Severe fecal incontinence remains a disabling condition for the patient and a major therapeutic challenge for the physician. A series of observational studies have indicated that placement of an artificial bowel sphincter is associated with marked improvement of continence and quality of life. We have performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of placement of an artificial bowel sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter®) on continence and quality of life in a group of severely incontinent adults.

METHODS

Fourteen adults (male:female, 1:13; age range, 44–75 years) were randomized to placement of the artificial bowel sphincter or to a program of supportive care and were followed for six months from operation or entry into the study. The principal outcome measure was the level of continence, measured with the Cleveland Continence Score, which provides a scale from 0 to 20, representing perfect control through to total incontinence. Secondary outcome measures were perioperative and late complications in the artificial bowel sphincter group, and the changes in quality of life in both groups.

RESULTS

In the control group, the Cleveland Continence Score was not significantly altered, with an initial value of 17.1 ± 2.3 and a final value of 14.3 ± 4.6 at six months. The artificial bowel sphincter group showed a highly significant improvement, changing from 19.0 ± 1.2 before placement to 4.8 ± 4.0 at six months after placement. One patient in the artificial bowel sphincter group had failure of healing of the perineal wound and explantation of the device (14 percent explantation rate). There were two other significant perioperative events of recurring fecal impaction initially after placement in one patient and additional suturing of the perineal wound in another. There were major improvements in the quality of life for all measures in the artificial bowel sphincter group. There was significant improvement in all eight subscales of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 measures. The American Medical Systems Quality of Life score was raised from 39 ± 6 to 83 ± 14 and the Beck Depression Inventory showed reduction from a level of mild depression (10.8 ± 9.3) to a normal value (6.8 ± 8.7). No significant changes in any of the quality of life measures occurred for the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a prospective, randomized trial format, we have shown that placement of an artificial bowel sphincter is safe and effective when compared with supportive care alone. Perioperative and late problems are likely to continue to occur and between 15 percent and 30 percent of patients may require permanent explantation. For the remainder, the device is easy and discrete to use, highly effective in achieving continence, and able to generate a major improvement in the quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. JS Kalantar S Howell NJ Talley (2002) ArticleTitlePrevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med J Aust 176 54–7 Occurrence Handle11936284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NI Edwards D Jones (2001) ArticleTitleThe prevalence of faecal incontinence in older people living at home Age Ageing 30 503–7 Occurrence Handle10.1093/ageing/30.6.503 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnpsVKhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11742780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DL Faltin MR Sangalli F Curtin A Morabia A Weil (2001) ArticleTitlePrevalence of anal incontinence and other anorectal symptoms in women Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12 117–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ptFymsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11374509

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DA Drossman Z Li E Andruzzi et al. (1993) ArticleTitleU.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact Dig Dis Sci 38 1569–80 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA28rjtlY%3D Occurrence Handle8359066

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AC Lynch BR Dobbs J Keating FA Frizelle (2001) ArticleTitleThe prevalence of faecal incontinence and constipation in a general New Zealand population; a postal survey N Z Med J 114 474–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjtlCitA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11760243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R Nelson N Norton E Cautley S Furner (1995) ArticleTitleCommunity-based prevalence of anal incontinence JAMA 274 559–61 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.274.7.559 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA2MnjsVM%3D Occurrence Handle7629985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RO Roberts SJ Jacobsen WT Reilly JH Pemberton MM Lieber NJ Talley (1999) ArticleTitlePrevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study J Am Geriatr Soc 47 837–41 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjtFyitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10404928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MK Baig SD Wexner (2000) ArticleTitleFactors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence Br J Surg 87 1316–30 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01592.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgtVGlsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11044155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. CG Baeten BP Geerdes EM Adang et al. (1995) ArticleTitleAnal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence N Engl J Med 332 1600–5 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199506153322403 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB2s3msVY%3D Occurrence Handle7753138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. CG Baeten HR Bailey A Bakka et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43 743–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhsFKjtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MJ Rongen O Uludag K Naggar ParticleEl BP Geerdes J Konsten CG Baeten (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 46 716–21 Occurrence Handle12794571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. PA Lehur P Glemain S Bruley des Varannes JM Buzelin J Leborgne (1998) ArticleTitleOutcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. A single institution report Int J Colorectal Dis 13 88–92 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840050141 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czgt1emsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9638494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. PA Lehur JV Roig M Duinslaeger (2000) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation Dis Colon Rectum 43 1100–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitVSgtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10950008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. PA Lehur F Zerbib M Neunlist P Glemain S Bruley des Varannes (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation Dis Colon Rectum 45 508–13 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6230-0 Occurrence Handle12006933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PE O’Brien S Skinner (2000) ArticleTitleRestoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 43 1213–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVGjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11005485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DF Altomare G Dodi F Torre ParticleLa G Romano E Melega M Rinaldi (2001) ArticleTitleMulticentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence Br J Surg 88 1481–6 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01895.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnkvVensA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11683745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. CJ Vaizey MA Kamm DM Gold CI Bartram S Halligan RJ Nicholls (1998) ArticleTitleClinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter Lancet 352 105–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czjs1Shsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9672276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. WD Wong SM Congliosi MP Spencer et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study Dis Colon Rectum 45 1139–53 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6334-6 Occurrence Handle12352228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. WD Wong LL Jensen DC Bartolo DA Rothenberger (1996) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 39 1345–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38vkvVw%3D Occurrence Handle8969658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. H Ortiz P Armendariz M DeMiguel MD Ruiz R Alos JV Roig (2002) ArticleTitleComplications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation Br J Surg 89 877–81 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02137.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zjvFCmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12081737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. T Takahashi S Garcia-Osogobio MA Valdovinos et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRadio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 45 915–22 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6328-4 Occurrence Handle12130880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. KE Matzel U Stadelmaier M Hohenfellner FP Gall (1995) ArticleTitleElectrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence Lancet 346 1124–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91799-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD3snkt1E%3D Occurrence Handle7475602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. CJ Vaizey MA Kamm IC Turner RJ Nicholls J Woloszko (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence Gut 44 407–12 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lt1WgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10026329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3crnsVw%3D Occurrence Handle8416784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ware J. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a user’s manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.

  26. J Ware (1997) ArticleTitleSF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 4 1

    Google Scholar 

  27. PJ Lustman RE Clouse LS Griffith RM Carney KE Freedland (1997) ArticleTitleScreening for depression in diabetes using the Beck Depression Inventory Psychosom Med 59 24–31 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC2szpvFI%3D Occurrence Handle9021863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. BE Robinson L Kelley (1996) ArticleTitleConcurrent validity of the Beck Depression Inventory as a measure of depression Psychol Rep 79 929–30 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38zoslU%3D Occurrence Handle8969102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. AE Chapman B Geerdes P Hewett et al. (2002) ArticleTitleSystematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence Br J Surg 89 138–53 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02018.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387isV2juw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11856125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

    Paul E. O’Brien M.D., F.R.A.C.S., John B. Dixon M.B.B.S., Ph.D., F.R.A.C.G.P. , Stewart Skinner M.B.B.S., Ph.D., F.R.A.C.S. & Cheryl Laurie R.N.

  2. The Aged Care Service, Caulfield General Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia

    Angela Khera B. Appl. Sci., M.A.P.A. & David Fonda M.B.B.S., B. Med. Sci., F.R.A.C.P., F.A.F.R.M.

Authors
  1. Paul E. O’Brien M.D., F.R.A.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John B. Dixon M.B.B.S., Ph.D., F.R.A.C.G.P.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stewart Skinner M.B.B.S., Ph.D., F.R.A.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheryl Laurie R.N.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Angela Khera B. Appl. Sci., M.A.P.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David Fonda M.B.B.S., B. Med. Sci., F.R.A.C.P., F.A.F.R.M.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul E. O’Brien M.D., F.R.A.C.S..

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the Australian Government’s Department of Health and Ageing.

About this article

Cite this article

O’Brien, P., Dixon, J., Skinner, S. et al. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Placement of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for the Control of Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1852–1860 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0717-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0717-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation