Skip to main content
Log in

Value of Rectal Ultrasound in Predicting Staging and Outcome in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE:

Transrectal ultrasonography is considered the best method to stage rectal cancer, and thus the need for preoperative radiotherapy. This retrospective study was designed to determine the prognostic value of uTN classification on survival of patients treated by preoperative radiotherapy and surgery.

METHODS:

A total of 218 patients with proven rectal adenocarcinoma were staged by transrectal ultrasonography before treatment. Transrectal ultrasonography reports were reviewed for TN classification, quality of examinations, and downstaging (pT < uT).

RESULTS:

Transrectal ultrasonography stages were as follows: uT1, n = 2; uT2, n = 61; uT3, n = 145; uT4, n = 10; uN0, n = 94; uN+, n = 124. After radiotherapy, based on operative specimen, lesions were staged as pT0, n = 27; pT1, n = 20; pT2, n = 60; pT3/4, n = 111; pN0, n = 160; pN+, n = 58; pM+, n = 10. Downstaging (measured as a reduction in TN level determined by transrectal ultrasonography and pathology of resected specimen) occurred in 42.6 percent for T and 38.1 percent for N. Five-year overall and disease-free survivals were 71.3 and 62.7 percent, respectively (median follow-up, 62 months). In univariate or multivariate analysis including parameters available before treatment, uT and age but not uN were statistically significant prognosis factor for overall survival. Patients with TN downstaging had significantly better overall survival. In multivariate analysis, including all parameters, only age, gender, pT, and pN+ status predicted poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by preoperative radiotherapy, uT classification determined by transrectal ultrasonography before radiotherapy, pT and pN classification determined after radiotherapy, and tumor downstaging were predictors of survival contrary to uN. Only pTN classification, age, and gender were independent predictors in multivariate analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F Eckhauser J Knol (1997) ArticleTitleSurgery for primary and metastatic colorectal cancer Gastroenterol Clin North Am 26 103–28 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC1cjjsV0%3D Occurrence Handle9119436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P Goudet P Roy I Arveux P Cougard J Faivre (1997) ArticleTitlePopulation-based study of the treatment and prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 84 1546–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FlsV2rtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9393276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. GJ Frykholm B Glimelius L Pahlman (1993) ArticleTitlePreoperative or postoperative irradiation in adenocarcinoma of the rectum: final treatment results of a randomized trial and an evaluation of late secondary effects Dis Colon Rectum 36 564–72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB2s3mtFM%3D Occurrence Handle8500374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous (1997) ArticleTitleImproved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med 336 980–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous (2001) ArticleTitleAdjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8,507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet 358 1291–1304

    Google Scholar 

  6. P Burtin J Boyer (1995) ArticleTitleConsensus conference 1994 on treatments of cancer of the rectum: what can we expect from endorectal ultrasonography? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 19 1001–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3cnnsVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8729411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NK Kim MJ Kim SH Yun SK Sohn JS Min (1999) ArticleTitleComparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 770–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgsV2ntA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10378601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R Lambert G Caletti E Cho et al. (2000) ArticleTitleInternational workshop on the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound in gastroenterology Endoscopy 32 549–84 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Flt1KrsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10917190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GC Harewood MJ Wiersema H Nelson et al. (2002) ArticleTitleA prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer Gastroenterology 123 24–32 Occurrence Handle12105829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. U Hildebrandt G Feifel (1985) ArticleTitlePreoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound Dis Colon Rectum 28 42–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqC38njtFQ%3D Occurrence Handle3882360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MJ Solomon RS McLeod (1993) ArticleTitleEndoluminal transrectal ultrasonography: accuracy, reliability, and validity Dis Colon Rectum 36 200–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC2crnvFA%3D Occurrence Handle8425429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. JM Wheeler BF Warren AC Jones NJ Mortensen (1999) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: implications for surgeons, pathologists and radiologists Br J Surg 86 1108–20 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvjs1KmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10504363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C Berger A Muret Particlede P Garaud et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer: predictive factors of tumor downstaging and residual tumor cell density (RTCD): prognostic implications Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37 619–27 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00577-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB28nntlw%3D Occurrence Handle9112461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MC Kaminsky-Forrett T Conroy E Luporsi et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePrognostic implications of downstaging following preoperative radiation therapy for operable T3-T4 rectal cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42 935–41 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FosVGmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9869213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. JP Gerard (1994) ArticleTitleThe use of radiotherapy for patients with low rectal cancer: an overview of the Lyon experience ANZ J Surg 64 457–63 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB1c%2FjsFA%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. OH Beahrs DE Henson RV Hutter BJ Kennedy (1992) NoChapterTitle American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer EditionNumber4th ed Lippincott Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. InstitutionalAuthorNameFrancophone Federation of Digestive Tract Cancerology (2002) ArticleTitleWhat can be done for patients with cancer of the digestive tract in 2003? Guidelines of the Francophone Federation of Digestive Tract Cancerology - Part I Gastroenterol Clin Biol 26 1140–64

    Google Scholar 

  18. DR Cox (1972) ArticleTitleRegression models and life tables J Roy Stat Soc B 34 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  19. B Napoleon B Pujol F Berger PJ Valette JP Gerard JC Souquet (1991) ArticleTitleAccuracy of endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer treated by radiotherapy Br J Surg 78 785–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6A3sfpvVA%3D Occurrence Handle1873701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. NA Janjan J Abbruzzese R Pazdur et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePrognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer Radiother Oncol 51 153–60 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00054-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzmt1Wrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10435807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. P Spinelli M Schiavo E Meroni et al. (1999) ArticleTitleResults of EUS in detecting perirectal lymph node metastases of rectal cancer: the pathologist makes the difference Gastrointest Endosc 49 754–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ns1GitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10343222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. H Yanagi M Kusunoki T Yamamura (1998) ArticleTitleThe prediction of the prognosis for rectal carcinoma down-staged by pre-operative radiotherapy by transrectal ultrasonography Int Surg 83 161–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fms1KlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9851337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. EH Birnbaum OA Ogunbiyi G Gagliardi et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSelection criteria for treatment of rectal cancer with combined external and endocavitary radiation Dis Colon Rectum 42 727–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgsV2nsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10378596

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. FH Hulsmans A Bosma PJ Mulder JW Reeders GN Tytgat (1992) ArticleTitlePerirectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer: in vitro correlation of sonographic parameters and histopathologic findings Radiology 184 553–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A3MbpslQ%3D Occurrence Handle1620864

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. GA Boyce MV Sivak SuffixJr IC Lavery et al. (1992) ArticleTitleEndoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging of rectal carcinoma Gastrointest Endosc 38 468–71 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A1c%2Fjsl0%3D Occurrence Handle1511823

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. SG Mackay CK Pager D Joseph PJ Stewart MJ Solomon (2003) ArticleTitleAssessment of the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography in anorectal neoplasia Br J Surg 90 346–50 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4042 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fot1OitA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12594671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. DR Adams GJ Blatchford KM Lin CA Ternent AG Thorson MA Christensen (1999) ArticleTitleUse of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 159–66 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3is1CksA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10211490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Y Francois CJ Nemoz J Baulieux et al. (1999) ArticleTitleInfluence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial J Clin Oncol 17 2396–402 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FjtVSgsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10561302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. RP Saw M Morgan D Koorey et al. (2003) ArticleTitlep53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, and thymidylate synthase as predictors of histopathologic response and survival in low, locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative adjuvant therapy Dis Colon Rectum 46 192–202 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6524-2 Occurrence Handle12576893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment.

The authors thank Professor J. P. Gerard from the Department of Radiotherapy, Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Pierre Bénite, for allowing us to review patient files and for his invaluable advice throughout the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Roman M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Roman, S., Cenni, JC., Roy, P. et al. Value of Rectal Ultrasound in Predicting Staging and Outcome in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1323–1330 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0583-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0583-2

Key words

Navigation