Skip to main content
Log in

Pregnancy and Delivery Before and After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Immediate and Long-Term Consequences and Outcomes

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE:

This study was designed to evaluate pregnancy, delivery, and functional outcome in females before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

METHODS:

From a prospective database of 1,454 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis between 1981 and 1995, a standardized questionnaire was sent to all female patients aged 40 years or younger at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 544).

RESULTS:

The response rate was 83 percent (450/544) with a mean follow-up after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis of 13 years. A total of 141 females were pregnant after the chronic ulcerative colitis diagnosis, but before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (236 pregnancies; mean, 1.7) and 87 percent delivered vaginally. A mean of five (range, 1–16) years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 135 females were pregnant (232 pregnancies; mean, 1.7). Comparison of pregnancy and delivery before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the same females (n = 37) showed no difference in birth weight, duration of labor, pregnancy/delivery complications, vaginal delivery rates (59 percent before vs. 54 percent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis), and unplanned cesarean section (19 vs.14 percent). Planned cesareans occurred only after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and were prompted by obstetrical concerns in only one of eight. Pouch function at first follow-up after delivery (mean, 7 months) was similar to pregravida function. After ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, daytime stool frequency was the same after delivery as pregravida (5.4 vs. 5.4, not significant) but was increased at the time of last follow-up (68 months after delivery; 5.4 vs. 6.4; P < 0.001). The rate of occasional fecal incontinence also was higher (20 percent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 21 percent pregravida vs. 36 percent at last follow-up; P = 0.01). No difference in functional outcome was noted compared with females who were never pregnant after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 307). Age and becoming pregnant did not affect the probability of pouch-related complications, such as stricture, pouchitis, and obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Successful pregnancy and vaginal delivery occur routinely in females with chronic ulcerative colitis before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The method of delivery should be dictated by obstetrical considerations. Pouch function and the incidence of complications in females with pregnancies seem largely unaffected long-term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. TC Counihan PL Roberts DJ Schoetz SuffixJr JA Coller JJ Murray MC Veidenheimer (1994) ArticleTitleFertility and sexual and gynecologic function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 37 1126–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. ES Juhasz B Fozard RR Dozois DM Ilstrup H Nelson (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis function following childbirth: an extended evaluation Dis Colon Rectum 38 159–65

    Google Scholar 

  3. H Nelson RR Dozois KA Kelly GD Malkasian BG Wolff DM Ilstrup (1989) ArticleTitleThe effect of pregnancy and delivery on the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis functions Dis Colon Rectum 32 384–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Ravid CS Richard LM Spencer et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePregnancy, delivery, and pouch function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis Dis Colon Rectum 45 1283–8

    Google Scholar 

  5. HJ Scott RS McLeod J Blair B O’Connor Z Cohen (1996) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis: pregnancy, delivery and pouch function Int J Colorectal Dis 11 84–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. JB Zeldis (1989) ArticleTitlePregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease West J Med 151 168–71

    Google Scholar 

  7. JH Pemberton KA Kelly RW Beart SuffixJr RR Dozois BG Wolff DM Ilstrup (1987) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results Ann Surg 206 504–13

    Google Scholar 

  8. KA Kelly JH Pemberton BG Wolff RR Dozois (1992) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis Curr Probl Surg 29 57–131

    Google Scholar 

  9. WT Reilly JH Pemberton BG Wolff et al. (1997) ArticleTitleRandomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa Ann Surg 225 666–77

    Google Scholar 

  10. M Hudson G Flett TS Sinclair PW Brunt A Templeton NA Mowat (1997) ArticleTitleFertility and pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease Int J Gynaecol Obstet 58 229–37

    Google Scholar 

  11. K Ording Olsen S Juul I Berndtsson T Oresland S Laurberg (2002) ArticleTitleUlcerative colitis: female fecundity before diagnosis, during disease, and after surgery compared with a population sample Gastroenterology 122 15–9

    Google Scholar 

  12. T Oresland S Palmblad M Ellstrom I Berndtsson N Crona L Hulten (1994) ArticleTitleGynaecological and sexual function related to anatomical changes in the female pelvis after restorative proctocolectomy Int J Colorectal Dis 9 77–81

    Google Scholar 

  13. JJ Sorokin SM Levine (1983) ArticleTitlePregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the literature Obstet Gynecol 62 247–52

    Google Scholar 

  14. G Jarnerot (1982) ArticleTitleFertility, sterility, and pregnancy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease Scand J Gastroenterol 17 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. JA Martin BE Hamilton SJ Ventura F Menacker MM Park PD Sutton (2002) ArticleTitleBirths: final data for 2001 Natl Vital Stat Rep 51 1–102

    Google Scholar 

  16. KO Olsen M Joelsson S Laurberg T Oresland (1999) ArticleTitleFertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women with ulcerative colitis Br J Surg 86 493–5

    Google Scholar 

  17. MH Thornton DB Johns JD Campeau F Hoehler GS DiZerega (1998) ArticleTitleClinical evaluation of 0.5 percent ferric hyaluronate adhesion prevention gel for the reduction of adhesions following peritoneal cavity surgery: open-label pilot study Hum Reprod 13 1480–5

    Google Scholar 

  18. M Oncel FH Remzi AJ Senagore JT Connor VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of a novel liquid (Adcon-P) and a sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) in postsurgical adhesion formation in a murine model Dis Colon Rectum 46 187–91

    Google Scholar 

  19. D Hahnloser TM Young-Fadok (2003) ArticleTitleEarlier postoperative spontaneous diuresis in laparoscopic versus open total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) Surg Endosc 17 (Suppl) S238

    Google Scholar 

  20. JM Matthews IJ Kodner RD Fry VW Fazio (1986) ArticleTitleEntrapped ovary syndrome Dis Colon Rectum 29 341–3

    Google Scholar 

  21. KA Gopal AL Amshel IL Shonberg BA Levinson M VanWert J VanWert (1985) ArticleTitleOstomy and pregnancy Dis Colon Rectum 28 912–6

    Google Scholar 

  22. B Ojerskog NG Kock BM Philipson M Philipson (1988) ArticleTitlePregnancy and delivery in patients with a continent ileostomy Surg Gynecol Obstet 167 61–4

    Google Scholar 

  23. M Walker J Sylvain H Stern (1997) ArticleTitleBowel obstruction in a pregnant patient with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Can J Surg 40 471–3

    Google Scholar 

  24. CP Delaney FH Remzi T Gramlich B Dadvand VW Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleEquivalent function, quality of life and pouch survival rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for indeterminate and ulcerative colitis Ann Surg 236 43–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. R Farouk JH Pemberton BG Wolff RR Dozois S Browning D Larson (2000) ArticleTitleFunctional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis Ann Surg 231 919–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. AR MacLean Z Cohen HM MacRae et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRisk of small bowel obstruction after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Ann Surg 235 200–6

    Google Scholar 

  27. ME Pezim (1984) ArticleTitleSuccessful childbirth after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir Br J Surg 71 292

    Google Scholar 

  28. UM Peschers GN Schaer JO DeLancey B Schuessler (1997) ArticleTitleLevator ani function before and after childbirth Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1004–8

    Google Scholar 

  29. AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson CI Bartram (1993) ArticleTitleEffect of pregnancy on anal sphincter morphology and function Int J Colorectal Dis 8 206–9

    Google Scholar 

  30. V Donnelly M Fynes D Campbell H Johnson PR O’Connell C O’Herlihy (1998) ArticleTitleObstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage Obstet Gynecol 92 955–61

    Google Scholar 

  31. AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson JM Thomas CI Bartram (1993) ArticleTitleAnal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery N Engl J Med 329 1905–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. Pemberton M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Hahnloser, D., Pemberton, J., Wolff, B. et al. Pregnancy and Delivery Before and After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Immediate and Long-Term Consequences and Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1127–1135 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0569-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0569-0

Key words

Navigation