Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Water resource selection of large mammals for water resources planning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iran is one of the driest countries in the world and shortage of water is one of the main concerns for wildlife conservation in this country. We have studied eight mammal species at Bafgh protected area at the center of Iran. We have investigated the physic-chemical parameters (salinity, chlorine, bicarbonate, carbonate, calcium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, total dissolved solids, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, electrical conductivity, and pH) and geo-ecological characteristics (altitude, slope, distance of settlements in rural area, distance of road, distance of stream, distance of protection station, distance of mine, distance of human-made construction, percent coverage of Phragmites australis, percent coverage of Pistacia atlantica, percent coverage of Peganum harmala, percent coverage of Punica granatum) of water bodies and their relationships with big mammals’ visiting frequencies from these water bodies. We have developed species–environment relationships using a backward-selected logistic regression. A separate model has been developed for each species, because we expected that different species may respond differently to environmental parameters. Our results showed that slope, elevation, and distance of settlement, road, protection station, mine, and human-made construction are the most important variables in the selection of water sources for the studied species. Our results also indicated that natural water resources in summer had the highest importance for Panthera pardus, Ovis orientalis, Vulpes vulpes, Felis silvestris, and Capra aegagrus, while during the season the artificial water resource showed the highest priority for Caracal caracal, Gazella bennettii, and Canis aureus. Therefore, it is suggested that protected area managers pay more attention to natural water bodies to be sure that wildlife does not face water shortage in critical seasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts G, MacKenzie M, McConnell B, Fedak M, Matthiopoulos J (2008) Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography 31(1):140–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour M, Sabetraftar A (2005) Review of cycles and indices of drought and their effect on water resources, ecological, biological, agricultural, social and economical issues in Iran. Int J Environ Stud 62(6):709–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaikei, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of maximum likelihood principle. In Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Information Theory (pp. 267–281)

  • Alkire D (2008) Livestock water guidelines. Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation

  • Anile S, Amico C, Ragni B (2012) Population density estimation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Sicily using camera trapping. Wildl Biol Pract 8(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Barboza PS, Parker KL, Hume ID (2008) Integrative wildlife nutrition. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Bleich VC, Andrew NG, Martin MJ, Mulcahy GP, Pauli AM, Rosenstock SS (2006) Quality of water available to wildlife in desert environments: comparisons among anthropogenic and natural sources. Wildl Soc Bull 34(3):627–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Marshal JP, Andrew NG (2010) Habitat use by a desert ungulate: predicting effects of water availability on mountain sheep. J Arid Environ 74(6):638–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Boustani, F. (2008). Sustainable water utilization in arid region of Iran by Qanats. In Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (Vol. 33, pp. 213–216)

  • Broyles B (1995) Desert wildlife water developments: questioning use in the Southwest. Wildl Soc Bull (1973–2006) 23(4):663–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles B, Cutler TL (1999) Effect of surface water on desert bighorn sheep in the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull:1082–1088

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 33(2):261–304

  • Cain JW III, Krausman PR, Morgart JR, Jansen BD, Pepper MP (2008) Responses of desert bighorn sheep to removal of water sources. Wildlife Monographs, 171(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J. (2015). Large mammal water use on the Barry M. Goldwater range-east in Southwestern Arizona (Doctoral dissertation)

  • Chavoshian, S. A., Takeuchi, K., & Funada, S. (2005). An overview to transboundary and shared water resources management in Iran, technical challenges and solutions. The role of water sciences in transboundary river basin management, Proc. Thailand, 189–195

  • Ebrahimi A, Farashi A, Rashki A (2017) Habitat suitability of Persian leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) in Iran in future. Environ Earth Sci 76(20):697

    Google Scholar 

  • Farashi A, Shariati M, Hosseini M (2017) Identifying biodiversity hotspots for threatened mammal species in Iran. Mamm Biol 87:71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin D, Morris DW, McLoughlin PD (2008) Habitat selection and the evolution of specialists in heterogeneous environments. Israel J Ecol Evolution 54(3–4):311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoddousi A, Hamidi AHK, Ghadirian T, Ashayeri D, Moshiri H, Khorozyan I (2008) The status of the persian leopard in Bamu National Park, Iran. Cat News 49:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, G. R., Brennan, K., Gentles, T., Hill, B., Low Choy, J., Mahney, T., ... & Stokeld, D. (2015). A guide for the use of remote cameras for wildlife survey in northern Australia. National Environmental Research Program, Northern Australia Hub: Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT

  • Golightly RT Jr, Ohmart RD (1984) Water economy of two desert canids: coyote and kit fox. J Mammal 65(1):51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Mondal K, Sankar K, Qureshi Q (2009) Estimation of striped hyena Hyaena hyaena population using camera traps in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 106(3):284

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks LL, Elder JM (1979) Human disturbance of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. J Wildl Manag 43:909–915

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S. F., Agouridis, C. T., & Gumbert, A. A. (2008). Drinking water quality guidelines for cattle. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service ID-170

  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. (2018). Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria version 2. Prepared by the standards and petitions subcommittee. http://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/RedListGuidelines.pdf

  • Kamler JF, Gipson PS (2000) Home range, habitat selection, and survival of bobcats, Lynx rufus, in a prairie ecosystem in Kansas. Canadian Field-Naturalist 114(3):388–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Karami M, Ghadirian T, Faizolahi K (2015) The atlas of the mammals of Iran. Iran Department of the Environment, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluever BM (2015) Relationships between water developments and select mammals on the US Army Dugway proving ground. Utah State University, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluever BM, Gese EM, Dempsey SJ (2017) Influence of free water availability on a desert carnivore and herbivore. Current Zoology 63(2):121–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krausman PR, Rosenstock SS, III JWC (2006) Developed waters for wildlife: science, perception, values, and controversy. Wildl Soc Bull 34(3):563–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen RT, Bissonette JA, Flinders JT, Whiting JC (2012) Framework for understanding the influences of wildlife water developments in the western United States. Calif Fish Game 98(3):148–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawhead DN (1984) Bobcat Lynx rufus home range, density and habitat preference in South-Central Arizona. Southwest Nat 29:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Longshore KM, Lowrey C, Thompson DB (2009) Compensating for diminishing natural water: predicting the impacts of water development on summer habitat of desert bighorn sheep. J Arid Environ 73(3):280–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn JC, Rosenstock SS, Chambers CL (2008) Avian use of desert wildlife water developments as determined by remote videography. West N Am Naturalist 68(1):107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald ML, Rogers QR, Morris JG (1984) Nutrition of the domestic cat, a mammalian carnivore. Annu Rev Nutr 4(1):521–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshal JP, Bleich VC, Krausman PR, Reed ML, Andrew NG (2006) Factors affecting habitat use and distribution of desert mule deer in an arid environment. Wildl Soc Bull 34(3):609–619

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen HE (1981) Desert bighorn zoogeography and adaptation in relation to historic land use. Wildl Soc Bull:171–179

  • McKee CJ, Stewart KM, Sedinger JS, Bush AP, Darby NW, Hughson DL, Bleich VC (2015) Spatial distributions and resource selection by mule deer in an arid environment: responses to provision of water. J Arid Environ 122:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin PD, Morris DW, Fortin D, Vander Wal E, Contasti AL (2010) Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. J Anim Ecol 79(1):4–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McShea WJ, Forrester T, Costello R, He Z, Kays R (2016) Volunteer-run cameras as distributed sensors for macrosystem mammal research. Landscape Ecology 31(1):55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaletz ST, Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ (2018) Drivers of terrestrial plant production across broad geographical gradients. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27(2):166–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobæk R, Mysterud A, Egil Loe L, Holand Ø, Austrheim G (2009) Density dependent and temporal variability in habitat selection by a large herbivore; an experimental approach. Oikos 118(2):209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgart JR, Hervert JJ, Krausman PR, Bright JL, Henry RS (2005) Sonoran pronghorn use of anthropogenic and natural water sources. Wildl Soc Bull 33(1):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrup JM, Hooten MB, Anderson CR Jr, Wittemyer G (2013) Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use–availability design. Ecology 94(7):1456–1463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olkowski, A. A. (2011). Livestock water quality: a field guide for cattle, horses, poultry and swine. Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada

  • Pandit SN, Zhao Y, Ciborowski JJ, Gorman AM, Knight CT (2013) Suitable habitat model for walleye (Sander vitreus) in Lake Erie: implications for inter-jurisdictional harvest quota allocations. J Great Lakes Res 39(4):591–601

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Resetarits, W., Binckley, C. A., & Chalcraft, D. R. (2005). Habitat selection, species interactions, and processes of community assembly in complex landscapes. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 374–398

  • Rich LN, Beissinger SR, Brashares JS, Furnas BJ (2019) Artificial water catchments influence wildlife distribution in the Mojave Desert. J Wildl Manag 83(4):855–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock SS, Ballard WB, Devos JC Jr (1999) Benefits and impacts of wildlife water developments. J Range Manag 52:302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock SS, Rabe MJ, O’brien CS, Waddell RB (2004) Studies of wildlife water developments in southwestern Arizona: wildlife use, water quality, wildlife diseases, wildlife mortalities, and influences on native pollinators. Tech Guid Bull 8:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock SS, Bleich VC, Rabe MJ, Reggiardo C (2005) Water quality at wildlife water sources in the Sonoran Desert, United States. Rangel Ecol Manag 58(6):623–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouhani, F., Jalili, KH., Mokhtari, K. (2005). Determination of the quantitative and qualitative status of water resources based on wildlife requirements in Kolah-Ghazi National Park. Water resources management conference, Tehran, Iran

  • Sanchez, J. E., & Haderlie, M. K. (1990). Water management on Cabeza Prieta and Kofa National Wildlife Refuges. In Proceedings of the wildlife water development symposium (Vol. 30, pp. 73–77)

  • Shields AV, Larsen RT, Whiting JC (2012) Summer watering patterns of mule deer in the Great Basin Desert, USA: implications of differential use by individuals and the sexes for management of water resources. Sci World J 2012:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J, Harvey M, Greenwood R, Dodd M, Rosewell J, Rebelo T, Ansine J, McConway K (2015) Crowdsourcing the identification of organisms: a case-study of iSpot. ZooKeys 480:125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson NO, Stewart KM, Bleich VC (2011) What have we learned about water developments for wildlife? Not enough! Calif Fish Game 97(4):190–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P. (2008). The population estimation and feeding habits of Striped Hyena (Hyaena hyaena) in related to land use pattern in semiarid region of Rajasthan (doctoral dissertation, M. Sc., thesis submitted to Manipal University, India)

  • Suárez-Castro AF, Simmonds JS, Mitchell MG, Maron M, Rhodes JR (2018) The scale-dependent role of biological traits in landscape ecology: a review. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 3(1):12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner EP, Elmore RD, Davis CA, Fuhlendorf SD (2017) Wintering bird responses to the presence of artificial surface water in a semi-arid rangeland. Wildl Biol 2017:wlb-00315

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beest FM, Mysterud A, Loe LE, Milner JM (2010) Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. J Anim Ecol 79(4):910–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Beest FM, Uzal A, Vander Wal E, Laforge MP, Contasti AL, Colville D, McLoughlin PD (2014) Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal. J Anim Ecol 83(1):147–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wal R, Sharma N, Mellish C, Robinson A, Siddharthan A (2016) The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conserv Biol 30(3):550–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Ni J, Tenhunen J (2005) Application of a geographically-weighted regression analysis to estimate net primary production of Chinese forest ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14(4):379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting JC, Bowyer RT, Flinders JT, Bleich VC, Kie JG (2010) Sexual segregation and use of water by bighorn sheep: implications for conservation. Anim Conserv 13(6):541–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff P (1988) Guidelines for livestock drinking water quality in dry areas. J Agr Trop 89(2):85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, F. (2001). Vertebrate ecology in caatinga: A. Distribution of wildlife in relation to water. B. Diet of pumas (Puma concolor) and relative abundance of felids (doctoral dissertation, Tesis de Maestría, University of Missouri-St. Louis)

  • Ziaee H (2009) Field guide to mammals of Iran. Wildlife Center Publication, Tehran, p 450 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Habitats and Biodiversity, Faculty of environment and energy, Islamic Azad University of Tehran–Sciences and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Javad Najafi

  2. Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of natural resources and environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Azita Farashi

  3. Faculty of Industrial & Mechanical Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

    AliAkbar Pasha Zanoosi

  4. Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of natural resource, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

    Roya Yadreh

Authors
  1. Javad Najafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azita Farashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. AliAkbar Pasha Zanoosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roya Yadreh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azita Farashi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najafi, J., Farashi, A., Pasha Zanoosi, A. et al. Water resource selection of large mammals for water resources planning. Eur J Wildl Res 65, 82 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-019-1321-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-019-1321-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation