Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating abundance of striped hyenas (Hyaena hyaena) in the Negev Desert of Israel using camera traps and closed capture–recapture models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating key state variables (e.g., abundance/density) of threatened/endangered species is a difficult yet crucial task. These variables are essential for wildlife conservationists/managers to assess the current states and trends of target populations and make state-dependent management decisions. We estimated, using camera traps and two different methodologies, the abundance of the near-threatened striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) in the Negev Highlands, Israel. Both the traditional closed capture–recapture (closed-CR) and the census/near-census frameworks (both rely on closed CR models) were employed. For attaining a census/near census, we calculated a range of plausible capture/detection probabilities and their combinations with sampling durations that would result in detection of ≥95% of the target population. We then covered a subsection (circa 400 km2) of the Negev Highlands using 15 camera traps for 83 days. This targeted sampling provides a strong indication for attaining a census/near census for capture/detection probabilities as low as p = 0.05. The closed CR models (M0 and Mb) yielded a model averaged estimates of abundance \( \widehat{\overline{N}} \) = 7 (SE 1.94E-05, PLCI 7-7) and capture/detection probability \( \widehat{\overline{p}} \) = 0.09 (SE 0.033, 95% CI 0.05–0.18). Using the estimated \( \widehat{\overline{p}} \), we calculated that during the sampling, we (ostensibly) captured the entire (99.9%) target population. Additionally, we used spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) approach to estimate the density of the hyenas in a subsection of our study area where hyenas were spotted and got an estimate of \( \widehat{D} \) = 0.085 individuals/km2 (SE 0.0334, 95% CI 0.040–0.178) or 8.5 individuals/100 km2. Many studies estimate abundance/density of threatened/endangered species using closed CR models; however, for small populations of elusive animals, these models often yield less accurate estimates exactly where accuracy is needed the most. While it likely increases the costs and time, the census/near-census framework provides a more accurate solution for such cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez-Flores CM, Heide-Jørgensen MP (2004) A risk assessment of the sustainability of the harvest of beluga (Delphinapterus leucas (Pallas 1776)) in West Greenland. ICES J Mar Sci 61:274–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AbiSaid M, Dloniak SMD (2015) Hyaena hyaena. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015, http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/full/10274/0 Accessed 23 October 2015

  • Ariefiandy A, Purwandana D, Seno A, Chrismiawati M, Jessop TS, Ciofi C (2014) Evaluation of three field monitoring-density estimation protocols and their relevance to Komodo dragon conservation. Biodivers Conserv 23:2473–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof R, Brøseth H, Gimenez O (2015) Wildlife in a politically divided world: Insularism inflates estimates of brown bear abundance. Conservation Letters, 0:1–9. doi: 10.1111/conl.12183.

  • Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bothma JDP, Walker C (1999) The striped hyaena. In: Larger carnivores of the African savannas. pp. 201–211. Berlin, New York: Springer.

  • Burnham KP, Overton WS (1978) Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical theoretic-information approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio RM (2013) Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of abundance and density from spatial capture-recapture data. PLoS One 8:e84017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Efford MG, Dawson DK, Robbins CS (2004) DENSITY: software for analysing capture–recapture data from passive detector arrays. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27:217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Efford MG, Fewster RM (2013) Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture. Oikos 122:918–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenari M, Shanan L, Tadmor N (1982) The Negev: The Challenge of a Desert (Second ed.), Harvard University Press.

  • Foster RJ, Harmsen BJ (2012) A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data. J Wildl Manag 76:224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber BD, Ivan JS, Burnham KP (2014) Estimating the abundance of rare and elusive carnivores from photographic-sampling data when the population size is very small. Popul Ecol 56:463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Mondal K, Sankar K, Qureshi Q (2009) Estimation of striped hyena Hyaena hyaena population using camera traps in Sariska tiger reserve, Rajasthan, India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 106:284–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Harihar A, Ghosh M, Fernandes M, Pandav B, Goyal SP (2010) Use of photographic capture-recapture sampling to estimate density of striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena): implications for conservation. Mammalia 74:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Doncaster CP (2011) Heterogeneous capture rates in low density populations and consequences for capture-recapture analysis of camera-trap data. Popul Ecol 53:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn R, Lacy RC, Lindenmayer DB, Marsh H, Kwan D, Lawler IR (2004) Unsustainable harvest of dugongs in Torres Strait and Cape York (Australia) waters: two case studies using population viability analysis. Anim Conserv 7:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henschel P, Ray J (2003) Leopards in African Rainforests: Survey and Monitoring Techniques. Global Carnivore Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, 50 pages, New York. https://www.panthera.org/cms/sites/default/files/documents/LeopardManual_English_lowres.pdf Accessed 03 July 2016.

  • Heptner VG, Sludskij AA (1980) Die Säugetiere der Sowjetunion, Volume II, Part 2, Raubtiere (Feloidea). VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D, Tadmor N (1962) Water regime and vegetation in the central Negev highlands of Israel. Ecology 43:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RM, Roe JD, Wangchuk R, Hunter DO (2006) Estimating snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture-recapture techniques. Wildl Soc Bull 34:772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU (1995) Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biol Conserv 71:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall WL (1999) Robustness of closed capture–recapture methods to violations of the closure assumption. Ecology 80:2517–2525

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (1976) Feeding and social behaviour of the striped hyaena (Hyaena vulgaris Desmarest). East African Wildlife Journal 14:91–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW (1978) Observations on the behaviour and ecology of the striped hyaena, Hyaena hyaena, in Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology 27:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RO, Gilardi J, Johnson R, Ndang’ang’a PK, Fotso R, Drori O, Perrin M (2014) Grey parrot Psittacus harvesting for conservation must have a robust scientific basis: commentary on Tamungang et al. (2013). International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 6:750–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn H (1985) The striped hyena in Israel. Hyaena Specialist Group Newsletter IUCN 2:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza E, Martineau PR, Brenner E, Dirzo R (2011) A novel method to improve individual animal identification based on camera-trapping data. J Wildl Manag 75:973–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills MGL, Hofer H (1998) Hyaenas, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC, Hyaena Specialist Group. IUCN. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 154 pp.

  • Nichols JD (1992) Capture-recapture models. Bioscience 42:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD (2014) The role of abundance estimates in conservation decision making. In: Verdade LM, Lyra-Jorge MC, Piña CI (eds) Applied Ecology and Human Dimensions in Biological Conservation, pp. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obbard ME, Howe EJ, Kyle CJ (2010) Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores. J Appl Ecol 47:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:3–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger I (1981) Hyaena hyaena. Mamm Species 150:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle JA, Chandler RB, Sollmann R, Gardner B (2013) Spatial Capture-Recapture. Academic Press, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Jhala Y, Qureshi Q, Vattakaven J, Gopal R, Nayak K (2010) Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters. Anim Conserv 13:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Bayrakcismith R, Tumursukh L, Johansson O, Sevger P, McCarthy T, Mishra C (2014) Vigorous dynamics underlies stable population of the endangered snow leopard Panthera uncia in Tost mountains, south Gobi, Mongolia. PLoS One 9(1–10):e101319. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Gopalaswamy AM, Karanth KU (2010) Factors influencing densities of striped hyenas (Hyaena hyaena) in arid regions of India. J Mammal 91:1152–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Qureshi Q, Sankar K, Krausman PR, Goyal SP, Nicholson KL (2014) Population density of striped hyenas in relation to habitat in a semi-arid landscape, western India. Acta Theriol 59:521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollmann R, Gardner B, Chandler RB, Shindle DB, Onorato DP, Royle JA, O’Connell AF (2013) Using multiple data sources provides density estimates for endangered Florida Panther. J Appl Ecol 50:961–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel (SPNI) (n.d.) Striped Hyena. The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel [in Hebrew]. http://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=197&ArticleID=3995 Accessed 03 July 2016.

  • van Aarde RJ, Skinner JD, Knight MH, Skinner DC (1988) Range use by a striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) in the Negev desert. J Arid Environ 22:387–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner AP (2006) Behavioral ecology of the striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena), PhD dissertation, Montana State University, Bozeman.

  • Wagner AP, Frank LG, Creel S (2008) Spatial grouping in behaviourally solitary striped hyaenas, Hyaena hyaena. Anim Behav 75:1131–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SW, Macdonald DW (2009) The use of camera traps for estimating tiger and leopard populations in the high altitude mountains of Bhutan. Biol Conserv 142:606–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA 8787-NERP, Los Alamos.

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement 1):120–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC (2008) Closed population estimation models and their extensions in program MARK. Environ Ecol Stat 15:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KR, Anderson DR (1985) Evaluation of two density estimators of small mammal population size. J Mammal 66:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (n.d.) Amur leopard. World Wildlife Fund. http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/endangered_species/amur_leopard2/ Accessed 12 June 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the members of the Arabian Leopard Project for the help in funding and carrying out this study. We warmly thank Itay Aner, Boris Shwarzman, Juma’a Sadan, Amir Horovitz, Eelke van Driel, and Haim Berger for their contribution to data collection and logistical support. Additionally, we are most grateful to Maggie Watson for her very helpful comments and help on earlier versions of this paper. Lastly, we wish to thank Brian Gerber for his most valuable comments on a previous version of this paper that set it on the right track.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Tichon.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by the ‘Arabian Leopard Project’ using funds obtained from a designated Kickstarter crowd funding: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1694685126/save-the-arabian-leopard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tichon, J., Rotem, G. & Ward, P. Estimating abundance of striped hyenas (Hyaena hyaena) in the Negev Desert of Israel using camera traps and closed capture–recapture models. Eur J Wildl Res 63, 5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1069-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1069-y

Keywords

Navigation