Abstract
In Finland, the conservation of large mammalian carnivores—brown bear, lynx, wolf and wolverine—is undermined by illegal killings that have commonly taken place after the implementation of national carnivore management plans. This hidden form of criminality cannot occur to such an extent without strong support from the local community. We examined the support of proximate groups by collecting data from hunters and women. In collecting data, we used non-active role playing with empathy-based fictitious stories. We used argumentation analysis to reveal the assumed species, the background of the illegal killing and especially the justifications and importance of community support for illegal killing. The results show that we have a conflict with strong basic emotions in hand as both illegal killing and support for illegal killing and hunting violators are based on anger and fear for children and domestic animals as well as frustration toward the authorities and the lack of proper management actions. The wolf is at the centre of the conflict due to the specific character of the species. Current policies have inevitably been lacking in terms of place-based policy, and that has led to conflicts between game management authorities/researchers and ordinary citizens. To facilitate a change in attitudes, we suggest focusing on affective factors via confidence-building measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwala M, Kumar S, Treves A, Naughton-Treves L (2010) Paying for wolves in Solapur, India and Wisconsin, USA: comparing compensation rules and practice to understand the goals and politics of wolf conservation. Biol Conserv 143:2945–2955
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (2000) Attitudes and the attitude–behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (Eds), EurRev SocPsychol, Vol 11. Wiley, West Sussex
Billig M (1996) Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bisi J, Kurki S (2008) Wolf debate in Finland. Expectations and objectives for the management of wolf population in regional and national level. Publications 12, University of Helsinki, Ruralia Institute, Seinäjoki
Bisi J, Liukkonen T, Mykrä S, Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2010) The good bad wolf—wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflict. Eur J Wild life Res 56:771–779
Bisi J, Kurki S, Svensberg M, Liukkonen T (2007) Human dimensions of wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. Eur J Wildlife Res 53:304–314
Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP (1999) The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. J Environ Psych 19:415–421
Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP, Thrane C (2001) Sociodemographic correlates of fear-related attitudes toward the wolf (Canis lupus lupus). Fauna Norvegica 21:25–33
Bjerke T, Reitan O, Kellert SR (1998) Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Soc Nat Resour 11:169–178
Borgström S (2011) Legitimacy issues in Finnish Wolf Conservation. J Environ Law 1–26
Breckler SJ (1984) Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J Pers Soc Psychol 47:1191–1205
Eagly A, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace College, Fort Worth
Ericsson G, Heberlein TA (2003) Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol Conserv 111:149–159
Erwin P (2001) Attitudes and persuasion. Taylor & Francis
Eskola A (1988) Non-active role-playing; some experiences. In: Eskola A, Kihlström A, Kivinen D, Weckroth K, Ylijoki OH (eds) Blind alleys in social psychology: a search for ways out. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Eskola J, Suoranta J (1998) Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. OsuuskuntaVastapaino, Tampere, pp 52–59
Gavin M, Solomon J, Blank SG (2010) Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conserv Biol 24:89–100
Gore ML, Kahler JS (2012) Gendered risk perceptions associated with human–wildlife conflict: implications for participatory conservation. PLoS One 7(3):e32901. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032901
Grönfors M (1999) Violence, masculinity and men in Sri Lanka. In: Eskola J (ed) Tätä kehtoo tutkia. Sosiaalitieteitä savolaisittain. Kuopionyliopistonselvityksiä E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 14, Kuopio University Occasional Reports E. Soc Sci 14:151–156
Jacobs MH, Vaske JJ, Roemer JM (2012) Toward a mental systems approach to human relationships with wildlife: the role of emotional dispositions. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:4–15
Jhala YV, Sharma DK (1997) Child-lifting by wolves in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. J Wild Res 2:94–101
Johansson M, Karlsson J, Pedersen E, Flykt A (2012a) Factors governing human fear of brownbear and wolf. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:68–74
Johansson M, Sjöström M, Karlsson J, Brännlund R (2012b) Is human fear affecting publicwillingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores? Soc Nat Resour 25:610–620
Karlsson J, Sjöström M (2007) Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol Conserv 137:610–616
Kojola I, Heikkinen S, Helle P (2011) Susikannan viimeaikaiset muutokset Suomessa eri aineistojen valossa. Suomen Riista 57:55–62
Kruuk H (2002) Hunter and hunted–relationships between carnivores and people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kumar S (2003) Wolf–human conflicts in Uttar Pradesh, India. 3rd International Wildlife Management Congress. Christchurch, New Zealand
Lambert WW, Lambert WE (1971) Sosiaalipsykologia, KJ GummerusOy, Jyväskylä. Original Print: Social Psychology 1964. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Liberg O, Chapron G, Wabakken P, Pedersen HC, Hobbs NT, Sand H (2012) Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc R Soc B 279(1730):910–915
Linnell J, Andersen D, Andersone R et al (2002) The fear of wolves: a review of wolf attacks on humans. NINA Oppdragsmelding 731:1–65
Linnell J, Solberga EJ, Brainerda S et al (2003) Is the fear of wolves justified? A Fennoscandian perspective. Acta Zool Lit 13:34–40
Liukkonen T, Mykrä S, Bisi J, Kurki S (2006) Ilveksiä ja ihmisiä. Julkaisuja 7, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki
Livneh H, Antonak RF (1994) Indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Rehabil Educ 8:103–137
Majić A (2007) Human dimensions in wolf management in Croatia: understanding public attitudes toward wolves over time and space. Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s
McNaught DA (1987) Wolves in Yellowstone—park visitors respond. Wildl Soc Bull 15:518–521
MAF (2005) Management plan for the wolf population in Finland. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 11b/2005, VammalankirjapainoOy
McNay ME (2002) Wolf–human interactions in Alaska and Canada: a review of the case history. Wildl Soc Bull 30:831–843
McNay ME, Mooney PW (2005) Attempted predation of a child by a grey wolf, Canis lupus, near Icy Bay, Alaska. Can Field-Nat 119:197–201
Mykrä S, Pohja-Mykrä M (2005) Some history regarding Finland’s policy on wolves and attitudes to them. In: Bisi J, Kurki S. The wolf debate in Finland. Publications 12, University of Helsinki, Ruralia Institute, Oy Fram Ab, Vaasa
Mykrä S, Liukkonen T, Bisi J, Kurki S (2006) Kansalaisten karhukannat. Julkaisuja 6, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki
Oatley K, Jenkins JM (1996) Understanding emotions. Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge
Parrott W (ed) (2001) Emotions in social psychology. Psychology Press, Philadelphia
Pellikka J, Lindén H, Rita H, Svensberg M (2007) Motives for voluntary wildlife monitoring in Finnish hunting teams. Wildl Biol 13:1–10
Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2008) Asialistalla ahma. Julkaisuja 13, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki
Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2013) Suurpetopolitiikka kriisissä – salakaadot ja yhteisön tuki. Raportteja 98, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki.
Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2014) Kansallisen suurpetopolitiikan kehittämisarviointi (Evaluation of national large carnivore management), Raportteja 114, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki
Pohja-Mykrä M, Vuorisalo T, Mykrä S (2005) Hunting bounties as a key measure for historical wildlife management and game conservation: Finnish bounty schemes in 1647–1975. Oryx 39:284–291
Pousette E (2000) De människoätande vargarna. BjørkelangenBok & Papir, Bjørkelangen
Pyka M, Nyqvist A, Monstad T, Hagstedt J, Korsell L (2007) Illegal jakt på stora rovdjur. Konflikt i laglöst land? Brå rapport No22, Brottsförebyggande rådet, Stockholm
Rantanen T, Vesala KM (1999) Soveltuuko asenteen käsitemyöslaadulliseentutkimukseen? Psykologia 5–6:343–348
Ratamäki O (2008) Finland’s wolf policy and new governance. J Environ Dev 17:316–339
Rosenberg MJ (1960) A structural theory of attitude dynamics. Publ Opin Q 24:319–340
Røskaft E, Handel B, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP (2007) Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildl Biol 13(2):172–185
Schanning K (2009) Human dimensions: public opinion research concerning wolves in the Great Lakes States of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. In: Wydeven AP, Van DeelenTR, HeskeEJ. (eds) Recovery of gray wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States. Springer, New York, pp 1–15
Simpura J, Fahrenkrug H, Hyttinen M, Thorsten T (1990) Drinking, everyday life situations and cultural norms in Denmark, Finland, and West Germany: an experiment with non-active role-playing. J Drug Issues 20:403–416
Smith DW, Bangs EE, Oaklea FJK et al (2010) Survival of colonizing wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains of the United States, 1982–2004. J Wildl Manage 74:620–634
Teel TL, Manfredo MJ (2010) Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conserv Biol 24:128–139
Teperi J (1977) Sudet Suomen rintamaiden ihmisten uhkana 1800-luvulla. Historiallisiatutkimuksia 101.Suomenhistoriallinenseura, Helsinki
Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv Biol 17:1491–1499
Vaske JJ, Roemer JM, Taylor JG (2013) Situational and emotional influences on the acceptability of wolf management actions in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Wildl Soc Bul 37:122–128
Verchick RRM (2004) Feminist theory and environmental justice. New perspectives on environmental justice: gender, sexuality and activism. New Brunswick Rutgers: University Press
Vesala K, Rantanen T (2007) Laadullinen asennetutkimus: lähtökohtia, periaatteita, mahdollisuuksia. In: Vesala K, Rantanen T (eds) Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa. Gaudeamus, Helsinki, pp 11–61
Williams CK, Ericsson G, Heberlein TA (2002) A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction 1972–2000. Wildl Soc Bull 30:575–584
Acknowledgments
Thanks go to the Rural Women's Advisory Organization in Kainuu, Satakunta, and South-West Finland and the Finnish Wildlife Agency’s regional agencies in Satakunta and Northern-Savo. Many thanks to Jukka Bisi, Juha Hiedanpää, Pirjo Ilvesviita, Sakari Mykrä, JannePitkänen and TimoVuorisalo for their contributions to the article. These results are part of a research project Toward societal sustainability in large carnivore management—background and importance of illegal killing funded by The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by R. White
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pohja-Mykrä, M., Kurki, S. Strong community support for illegal killing challenges wolf management. Eur J Wildl Res 60, 759–770 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0845-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0845-9