Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strong community support for illegal killing challenges wolf management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Finland, the conservation of large mammalian carnivores—brown bear, lynx, wolf and wolverine—is undermined by illegal killings that have commonly taken place after the implementation of national carnivore management plans. This hidden form of criminality cannot occur to such an extent without strong support from the local community. We examined the support of proximate groups by collecting data from hunters and women. In collecting data, we used non-active role playing with empathy-based fictitious stories. We used argumentation analysis to reveal the assumed species, the background of the illegal killing and especially the justifications and importance of community support for illegal killing. The results show that we have a conflict with strong basic emotions in hand as both illegal killing and support for illegal killing and hunting violators are based on anger and fear for children and domestic animals as well as frustration toward the authorities and the lack of proper management actions. The wolf is at the centre of the conflict due to the specific character of the species. Current policies have inevitably been lacking in terms of place-based policy, and that has led to conflicts between game management authorities/researchers and ordinary citizens. To facilitate a change in attitudes, we suggest focusing on affective factors via confidence-building measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwala M, Kumar S, Treves A, Naughton-Treves L (2010) Paying for wolves in Solapur, India and Wisconsin, USA: comparing compensation rules and practice to understand the goals and politics of wolf conservation. Biol Conserv 143:2945–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (2000) Attitudes and the attitude–behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (Eds), EurRev SocPsychol, Vol 11. Wiley, West Sussex

  • Billig M (1996) Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisi J, Kurki S (2008) Wolf debate in Finland. Expectations and objectives for the management of wolf population in regional and national level. Publications 12, University of Helsinki, Ruralia Institute, Seinäjoki

  • Bisi J, Liukkonen T, Mykrä S, Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2010) The good bad wolf—wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflict. Eur J Wild life Res 56:771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisi J, Kurki S, Svensberg M, Liukkonen T (2007) Human dimensions of wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. Eur J Wildlife Res 53:304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP (1999) The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. J Environ Psych 19:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP, Thrane C (2001) Sociodemographic correlates of fear-related attitudes toward the wolf (Canis lupus lupus). Fauna Norvegica 21:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Reitan O, Kellert SR (1998) Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Soc Nat Resour 11:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgström S (2011) Legitimacy issues in Finnish Wolf Conservation. J Environ Law 1–26

  • Breckler SJ (1984) Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J Pers Soc Psychol 47:1191–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly A, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace College, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Heberlein TA (2003) Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol Conserv 111:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin P (2001) Attitudes and persuasion. Taylor & Francis

  • Eskola A (1988) Non-active role-playing; some experiences. In: Eskola A, Kihlström A, Kivinen D, Weckroth K, Ylijoki OH (eds) Blind alleys in social psychology: a search for ways out. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskola J, Suoranta J (1998) Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. OsuuskuntaVastapaino, Tampere, pp 52–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin M, Solomon J, Blank SG (2010) Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conserv Biol 24:89–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gore ML, Kahler JS (2012) Gendered risk perceptions associated with human–wildlife conflict: implications for participatory conservation. PLoS One 7(3):e32901. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grönfors M (1999) Violence, masculinity and men in Sri Lanka. In: Eskola J (ed) Tätä kehtoo tutkia. Sosiaalitieteitä savolaisittain. Kuopionyliopistonselvityksiä E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 14, Kuopio University Occasional Reports E. Soc Sci 14:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH, Vaske JJ, Roemer JM (2012) Toward a mental systems approach to human relationships with wildlife: the role of emotional dispositions. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhala YV, Sharma DK (1997) Child-lifting by wolves in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. J Wild Res 2:94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Karlsson J, Pedersen E, Flykt A (2012a) Factors governing human fear of brownbear and wolf. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Sjöström M, Karlsson J, Brännlund R (2012b) Is human fear affecting publicwillingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores? Soc Nat Resour 25:610–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson J, Sjöström M (2007) Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol Conserv 137:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojola I, Heikkinen S, Helle P (2011) Susikannan viimeaikaiset muutokset Suomessa eri aineistojen valossa. Suomen Riista 57:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (2002) Hunter and hunted–relationships between carnivores and people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2003) Wolf–human conflicts in Uttar Pradesh, India. 3rd International Wildlife Management Congress. Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert WW, Lambert WE (1971) Sosiaalipsykologia, KJ GummerusOy, Jyväskylä. Original Print: Social Psychology 1964. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  • Liberg O, Chapron G, Wabakken P, Pedersen HC, Hobbs NT, Sand H (2012) Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc R Soc B 279(1730):910–915

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Linnell J, Andersen D, Andersone R et al (2002) The fear of wolves: a review of wolf attacks on humans. NINA Oppdragsmelding 731:1–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell J, Solberga EJ, Brainerda S et al (2003) Is the fear of wolves justified? A Fennoscandian perspective. Acta Zool Lit 13:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liukkonen T, Mykrä S, Bisi J, Kurki S (2006) Ilveksiä ja ihmisiä. Julkaisuja 7, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki

  • Livneh H, Antonak RF (1994) Indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Rehabil Educ 8:103–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Majić A (2007) Human dimensions in wolf management in Croatia: understanding public attitudes toward wolves over time and space. Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaught DA (1987) Wolves in Yellowstone—park visitors respond. Wildl Soc Bull 15:518–521

    Google Scholar 

  • MAF (2005) Management plan for the wolf population in Finland. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 11b/2005, VammalankirjapainoOy

  • McNay ME (2002) Wolf–human interactions in Alaska and Canada: a review of the case history. Wildl Soc Bull 30:831–843

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay ME, Mooney PW (2005) Attempted predation of a child by a grey wolf, Canis lupus, near Icy Bay, Alaska. Can Field-Nat 119:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykrä S, Pohja-Mykrä M (2005) Some history regarding Finland’s policy on wolves and attitudes to them. In: Bisi J, Kurki S. The wolf debate in Finland. Publications 12, University of Helsinki, Ruralia Institute, Oy Fram Ab, Vaasa

  • Mykrä S, Liukkonen T, Bisi J, Kurki S (2006) Kansalaisten karhukannat. Julkaisuja 6, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki

  • Oatley K, Jenkins JM (1996) Understanding emotions. Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott W (ed) (2001) Emotions in social psychology. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellikka J, Lindén H, Rita H, Svensberg M (2007) Motives for voluntary wildlife monitoring in Finnish hunting teams. Wildl Biol 13:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2008) Asialistalla ahma. Julkaisuja 13, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki

  • Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2013) Suurpetopolitiikka kriisissä – salakaadot ja yhteisön tuki. Raportteja 98, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki.

  • Pohja-Mykrä M, Kurki S (2014) Kansallisen suurpetopolitiikan kehittämisarviointi (Evaluation of national large carnivore management), Raportteja 114, Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki

  • Pohja-Mykrä M, Vuorisalo T, Mykrä S (2005) Hunting bounties as a key measure for historical wildlife management and game conservation: Finnish bounty schemes in 1647–1975. Oryx 39:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pousette E (2000) De människoätande vargarna. BjørkelangenBok & Papir, Bjørkelangen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyka M, Nyqvist A, Monstad T, Hagstedt J, Korsell L (2007) Illegal jakt på stora rovdjur. Konflikt i laglöst land? Brå rapport No22, Brottsförebyggande rådet, Stockholm

  • Rantanen T, Vesala KM (1999) Soveltuuko asenteen käsitemyöslaadulliseentutkimukseen? Psykologia 5–6:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratamäki O (2008) Finland’s wolf policy and new governance. J Environ Dev 17:316–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MJ (1960) A structural theory of attitude dynamics. Publ Opin Q 24:319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Handel B, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn BP (2007) Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildl Biol 13(2):172–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanning K (2009) Human dimensions: public opinion research concerning wolves in the Great Lakes States of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. In: Wydeven AP, Van DeelenTR, HeskeEJ. (eds) Recovery of gray wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States. Springer, New York, pp 1–15

  • Simpura J, Fahrenkrug H, Hyttinen M, Thorsten T (1990) Drinking, everyday life situations and cultural norms in Denmark, Finland, and West Germany: an experiment with non-active role-playing. J Drug Issues 20:403–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DW, Bangs EE, Oaklea FJK et al (2010) Survival of colonizing wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains of the United States, 1982–2004. J Wildl Manage 74:620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel TL, Manfredo MJ (2010) Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conserv Biol 24:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teperi J (1977) Sudet Suomen rintamaiden ihmisten uhkana 1800-luvulla. Historiallisiatutkimuksia 101.Suomenhistoriallinenseura, Helsinki

  • Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv Biol 17:1491–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ, Roemer JM, Taylor JG (2013) Situational and emotional influences on the acceptability of wolf management actions in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Wildl Soc Bul 37:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verchick RRM (2004) Feminist theory and environmental justice. New perspectives on environmental justice: gender, sexuality and activism. New Brunswick Rutgers: University Press

  • Vesala K, Rantanen T (2007) Laadullinen asennetutkimus: lähtökohtia, periaatteita, mahdollisuuksia. In: Vesala K, Rantanen T (eds) Argumentaatio ja tulkinta. Laadullisen asennetutkimuksen lähestymistapa. Gaudeamus, Helsinki, pp 11–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CK, Ericsson G, Heberlein TA (2002) A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction 1972–2000. Wildl Soc Bull 30:575–584

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks go to the Rural Women's Advisory Organization in Kainuu, Satakunta, and South-West Finland and the Finnish Wildlife Agency’s regional agencies in Satakunta and Northern-Savo. Many thanks to Jukka Bisi, Juha Hiedanpää, Pirjo Ilvesviita, Sakari Mykrä, JannePitkänen and TimoVuorisalo for their contributions to the article. These results are part of a research project Toward societal sustainability in large carnivore management—background and importance of illegal killing funded by The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Pohja-Mykrä.

Additional information

Communicated by R. White

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pohja-Mykrä, M., Kurki, S. Strong community support for illegal killing challenges wolf management. Eur J Wildl Res 60, 759–770 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0845-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0845-9

Keywords

Navigation