Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting the status of wild deer as hosts of Mycobacterium bovis infection in Britain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Control of livestock diseases can become complicated when wild animals are involved. The Eurasian badger (Meles meles) is considered the principle wildlife host of Mycobacterium bovis (which causes bovine tuberculosis, bTB) in Great Britain and Ireland, but wild deer have also been implicated. Whether wild deer are likely to perpetuate bTB in cattle depends on the exposure risks they pose, the mode of pathogen transmission, the distances over which the disease can be transported and whether they can maintain infection within their own populations independently of other sources. We evaluated the likely host status of each of four species of wild British deer (red, roe, fallow and Reeves' muntjac) and the badger across a range of densities typically observed in Britain by manipulating the reproductive number equation proposed by Anderson and May (1991). We estimate that roe deer almost certainly act as spillover hosts at densities lower than 30 km−2, red deer below 16 km−2, muntjac below 6 km−2, fallow below 4 km−2 and the badger below 2 km−2. We also estimate that muntjac will almost certainly act as maintenance hosts at densities above 56 km−2, fallow above 47 km−2 and badgers above 24 km−2. For densities between these values, we cannot be certain of the host status of these species, and for red and roe deer we cannot be certain of host status under most natural conditions typically experienced in parts of Britain experiencing high incidence of bTB in cattle. However, enhanced transmission rates resulting from artificially high densities such as might be experienced at supplementary feeding sites may be sufficient to promote independent maintenance of infection. We were not able to confidently assign host status to any species over a wide range of densities, but conclude that this is likely to reflect reality, where host status may be affected as much by, for example, demographic fluctuations as it is by population density. Our results imply densities below which populations of wild deer inhabiting cattle bTB hotspots ought to be maintained in order to control the possibility of them perpetuating the cycle of intra- and interspecific M. bovis transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo P, Ward AI, Real R, Smith GC (2010) Assessing biogeographical relationships in a multi-species system using favourability functions: a case study on British deer. Divers Distrib 16:515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases in humans. Dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow ND (1991) A spatially aggregated disease/host model of bovine TB in New Zealand possum populations. J Appl Ecol 28:777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow ND (2000) Non-linear transmission and simple models for bovine tuberculosis. J Anim Ecol 69:703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caley P, Hone J (2005) Assessing the host disease status of wildlife and the implications for disease control: Mycobacterium bovis infection in feral ferrets. J Appl Ecol 42:708–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter SP, Roy SS, Cowan DP, Massei G, Smith GC, Ji W, Rossi S, Woodroffe R, Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ (2009) Options for the control of disease 2: targeting hosts. In: Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Hutchings MR (eds) Management of disease in wild mammals. Springer, Tokyo, pp 121–146

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Central Science Laboratory (2006) A quantitative risk assessment on the role of wild deer in the perpetuation of TB in cattle. Project report SE3036. Defra, London

  • Chapman NG, Claydon K, Claydon M, Forde PG, Harris S (1993) Sympatric populations of muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)—a comparative analysis of their ranging behaviour, social organization and activity. J Zool (Lond) 229:623–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond 236B:339–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR, Donnelly CA, Bourne FJ, Gettinby G, McInerney JP, Morrison WI, Woodroffe R (2005) Simple model for tuberculosis in cattle and badgers. PNAS 102:17588–17593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawshaw TR, Griffiths IB, Clifton-Hadley RS (2008) Comparison of a standard and a detailed postmortem protocol for detecting Mycobacterium bovis in badgers. Vet Rec 163:473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cross PC, Drewe J, Patrek V, Pearce G, Samuel MD, Delahay RJ (2009) Wildlife population structure and parasite transmission: implications for disease management. In: Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Hutchings MR (eds) Management of disease in wild mammals. Springer, Tokyo, pp 9–29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Lisle GW, Mackintosh CG, Bengis RG (2001) Mycobacterium bovis in free-living and captive wildlife, including farmed deer. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 20:86–111

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lisle GW, Bengis RG, Schmitt SM, O'Brien DJ (2002) Tuberculosis in free-ranging wildlife: detection, diagnosis and management. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 21:317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Delahay RJ, de Leeuw ANS, Barlow AM, Clifton-Hadley RS, Cheeseman CL (2002) The status of Mycobacterium bovis infection in British wild mammals: a review. Vet J 163:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Ward AI, Cheeseman CL (2005) Options for the management of bovine tuberculosis transmission from badgers (Meles meles) to cattle: evidence from a long-term study. Mamm Stud 30:S73–S81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Barlow AM, Walker N, Harris A, Clifton-Hadley RS, Cheeseman CL (2007) Bovine tuberculosis infection in wild mammals in the south-west region of England: a survey of prevalence and a semi-quantitative assessment of the relative risks to cattle. Vet J 173:287–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly CA, Woodroffe R, Cox DR, Bourne FJ, Cheeseman CL, Clifton-Hadley RS, Wei G, Gettinby G, Gilks P, Jenkins H, Johnston WT, Le Fevre AM, McInerney JP, Morrison WI (2005) Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle. Nature 439:843–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti F, Sforzi A, Lovari S (2008) Intolerance amongst deer species at feeding: roe deer are uneasy banqueters. Behav Process 78:487–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher J, Clifton-Hadley RS (2000) Tuberculosis in badgers; a review of the disease and its significance for other animals. Res Vet Sci 69:203–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green P (2004) Tuberculosis in wild deer on Exmoor. Deer 13:14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin JFT, Mackintosh CG (2000) Tuberculosis in deer: perceptions, problems and progress. Vet J 160:202–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin JFT, Chin DN, Rodgers CR (2004) Diagnostic strategies and outcomes on those New Zealand deer farms with severe outbreaks of bovine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 84:293–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin JM, William DH, Kelly GE, Clegg TA, O'Boyle I, Collins JD, More SJ (2005) The impact of badger removal on the control of tuberculosis in cattle herds in Ireland. Prev Vet Med 67:237–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris S, Yalden DW (2008) Mammals of the British isles: handbook, 4th edn. The Mammal Society, Southampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hars J, Boschiroli ML, Duvauchelle A, Zanella G, Garin-Bastuji B (2007) Bovine tuberculosis in free-living wild ungulates in France. In: Book of abstracts, Ecology and Management of Wildlife Diseases Conference, Central Science Laboratory, York, p 15

  • Hayden DT, Cleaveland S, Taylor LH, Laurenson MK (2002) Identifying reservoirs of infection: a conceptual and practical challenge. Emerg Infect Dis 8:1468–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JA (2005) Wildlife–cattle interactions in northern Michigan: implications for the transmission of bovine tuberculosis. MS thesis, Utah State University

  • Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB (ISG) (2007) Bovine TB: the scientific evidence. A science base for a sustainable policy to control TB in cattle. An epidemiological investigation into bovine tuberculosis. Report to the Rt Hon David Miliband. London, Defra

  • Langbein J (2008) Management cull, not mass slaughter. Deer 14:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Smith JO, Cross PC, Briggs CJ, Daugherty M, Getz WM, Latto J, Sanchez MS, Smith AB, Swei A (2005) Should we expect population thresholds for wildlife disease? TREE 20:511–519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum H, Barlow N, Hone J (2001) How should pathogen transmission be modelled? TREE 16:295–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A (1998) Large male territories in a low-density population of roe deer Capreolus capreolus with small female home ranges. Wildl Biol 4:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent G (2005) The role of wild deer in the epidemiology and management of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand. PhD thesis, Lincoln University

  • Palmer MV, Waters MR, Whipple DL (2004a) Shared feed as a means of deer-to-deer transmission of Mycobacterium bovis. J Wildl Dis 40:87–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MV, Waters WR, Whipple DL (2004b) Investigation of the transmission of Mycobacterium bovis from deer to cattle through indirect contact. Amer J Vet Res 65:1483–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putman RJ, Moore NP (1998) Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mamm Rev 28:141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman RJ, Langbein J, Hewison AJM, Sharma SK (1996) Relative roles of density-dependent and density-independent factors in population dynamics of British deer. Mamm Rev 26:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LM, Cheeseman CL, Mallinson PJ, Clifton-Hadley RS (1997) The demography of a high-density badger (Meles meles) population in the west of England. J Zool (Lond) 242:705–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LM, Delahay RJ, Cheeseman CL, Smith GC, Clifton-Hadley RS (1999) The increase in badger (Meles meles) density at Woodchester Park, south-west England: implications for disease (Mycobacterium bovis) prevalence. Mammalia 63:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph BA, Riley SJ, Hickling GJ, Frawley BJ, Garner MS, Winterstein SR (2006) Regulating hunter baiting for white tailed deer in Michigan: biological and social considerations. Wildl Soc Bull 34:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman DP, Davenport J, More SJ, Clegg TA, Collins JD, Martin SW, Williams DH, Griffin JM, O'Boyle I (2009) How many Eurasian badgers Meles meles L. are there in the Republic of Ireland? Eur J Wildl Res 55:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GC (2001) Models of Mycobacterium bovis in wildlife and cattle. Tuberculosis 81:51–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staines BW, Welch D (1984) Habitat selection and impact of red (Cervus elaphus L.) and roe (Capreolus capreolus L.) deer in a sitka spruce plantation. Proc Roy Soc Edinb 82B:303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward AI (2005) Expanding ranges of wild and feral deer in Great Britain. Mamm Rev 35:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AI, Smith GC, Etherington TR, Delahay RJ (2009) Estimating the risk of cattle exposure to TB by wild deer, relative to badgers in England and Wales. J Wildl Dis 45:1104–1120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch D, Staines BW, Catt DC, Scott D (1990) Habitat usage by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish sitka spruce plantation. J Zool (Lond) 221:253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werckman C, Hardy T, Wainwright E (2000) Crystal Ball 2000 user manual. Decisioneering Inc., Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson D, Smith GC, Delahay R, Rogers LM, Cheeseman CL, Clifton-Hadley RS (2000) The effects of bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) on mortality in a badger (Meles meles) population in England. J Zool (Lond) 250:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe R, Donnelly CA, Wei G, Cox DR, Bourne FJ, Burke T, Butlin RK, Cheeseman CL, Gettinby G, Gilks P, Hedges S, Jenkins HE, Johnston WT, McInerney JP, Morrison WI, Pope LC (2009) Social group size affects Mycobacterium bovis infection in European badgers (Meles meles). J Anim Ecol 78:818–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs' Food and Farming Group. We are grateful to Richard (Dez) Delahay, the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for the extremely helpful, insightful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alastair I. Ward.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, A.I., Smith, G.C. Predicting the status of wild deer as hosts of Mycobacterium bovis infection in Britain. Eur J Wildl Res 58, 127–135 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0553-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0553-7

Keywords

Navigation