Skip to main content
Log in

On the efficiency of using song playback during call count surveys of Red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful management practices for declining bird species depend often on long-term surveys acquired by point counts. Despite high standardization of field protocols, uncertain detection probability remains an important source of variability and bias in point-count data. This effect is of main importance in low-responsive species as the Red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa), but it can be counterbalanced, increasing detection probability. In this 2-year study, we sampled using traditional point-count methods, followed by playback sessions for each repetition. We measured detection probability and the efficiency of playback for detectability in the context of a feasibility study on long-term point-count surveys for a harvested game bird, the Red-legged partridge. The results for both study years show a distinct increase in detection probability (23% and 45%, respectively) when using playback vs. the traditional point-count method. We also tested our results for heterogeneity, trap dependence, and time dependence, and no effect was detected. Thus, we suggest that the future design of long-term surveys on Red-legged partridges should consider abundance indices using playback sessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebischer NJ, Potts GR (1994) Red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa). In: Tucker GM, Heath MF (eds) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife, Cambridge, pp 214–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Alldredge M, Pollock K, Simons T, Collazo J, Shriner S (2007a) Time-of-detection method for estimating abundance from point-count surveys. The Auk 124:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alldredge MW, Simons TR, Pollock KH (2007b) A field evaluation of distance measurement error in auditory avian point count surveys. J Wildlife Manage 71(8):2759–2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen T, Finkbeiner SL, Johnson DH (2004) Comparison of detection rates of breeding marsh birds in passive and playback surveys at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota. Waterbirds 27(3):277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR, Burnham KP (1999) Understanding information criteria for selection among capture–recapture or ring recovery models. Bird Study 46 (Suppl):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJN, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird census techniques. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife-International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. Wageningen, BirdLife conservation Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J, Ferry C, Frochot B (1981) Point counts with unlimited distance. Stud Avian biol 6:414–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin JM, Barbier L, Roux D (2001) Suivi des effectifs nicheurs d’alaudidés, colombidé et turdidés en France: le programme ACT. Alauda 69:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin JM, Roux D, Eraud C (2003) Breeding bird monitoring in France: the ACT Survey. Ornis Hungarica 12–13:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster JP, Simons TR (2009) Testing the importance of auditory detections in avian point counts. J Field Ornithol 80(2):178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsuzaa S (1996) Validation d'une méthode de recensement des Perdrix rouges au printemps par utilisation de chants préenregistrés. Université de Montpellier II, DESS Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceugniet M, Aubin T (2001) The rally call recognition in males of two hybridizing partridge species, red-legged (Alectoris rufa) and rock (A-graeca) partridges. Behav Process 55(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson DK, Smith DR, Robbins CS (1995) Point count length and detection of forest neotropical migrants birds. USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep 149:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers R, Buehler DA, Bartlett JG, Klaus NA (1999) Influence of point count length and repeated visits on habitat model performance. J Wildlife Manage 63(3):815–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elphick CS (2008) How you count counts: the importance of methods research in applied ecology. J Appl Ecol 45:1313–1320, Letter to editors EJWR

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraud C, Boutin J-M, Roux D, Faivre B (2007) Spatial dynamics of an invasive bird species assessed using robust design occupancy analysis: the case of the Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) in France. J Biogeogr 34:1077–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans SA, Mougeot F, Redpath SM, Leckie F (2007) Alternative methods for estimating density in an upland game bird: the red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Wildl Biol 13:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry C, Frochot B (1970) L’avifaune nidificatrice d’une forêt de Chêne pédonculés en Bourgogne: étude de deux successions écologiques. Terre Vie 24:153–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo-Turpin H, Sirami C, Brotons L, Gonzalo L, Martin J-L (2008) Teasing out biological effects and sampling artifacts when using occupancy rate in monitoring programs. J Field Ornithol 79(2):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins RM (1991) Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47:725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (2008) In defense of indices: the case of bird surveys. J Wildlife Manage 72(4):857–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2004) Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Global Change Biol 10(1):148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzykowski Z, Goławski A (2009) Does the use of playback affect the estimates of numbers of the grey partridge Perdix perdix? Wildl Biol 15(2):123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubel J-E, Yahner R-H (2007) Detection probability of Golden-winged Warblers during point counts with and without playback recordings. J Field Ornithol 78(2):195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Akcakaya HR, Leader-Williams N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Stuart SN (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol 22(6):1424–1442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marion WR, O'Meara TE, Maehr DS (1981) Use of playbacks in sampling elusive or secretive birds. In: Ralph CJ, Scot JM (eds) Estimating the numbers of terrestrial birds, vol 6. Cooper Ornithological Society, Los Angeles, pp 81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Novoa C (1992) Validation of a spring density index for Pyrenean grey partridge, Perdix perdix hispaniensis obtained with playbacks of recorded calls. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monogr 62:135

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano AM, Arnold TW (2009) Estimating detection probabilities of waterfowl broods from ground-based surveys. J Wildlife Manage 73(5):686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pépin D, Fouquet M (1992) Factors affecting the incidence of dawn calling in red-legged and grey partridges. Behav Process 26:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH (1982) A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J Wildl Manage 46:757–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Farnsworth GR, Bailey LL, Sauer JR (2002) Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Boutin F, Mathon JF, Puchala JB (2001) Population dynamics of red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) In 'IUGB Congress-Perdix IX', 2001, Chypre

  • Ponce-Boutin F, Tl B, Mathon JF, Moutarde C, Corda E, Kmiec L (2004) Aménagement des milieux et perdrix rouge en collines méditerranéennes françaises. Faune sauvage 262:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Boutin F, Brun J-C, Ricci J-C (2006) La perdrix rouge et sa chasse en région méditerranéenne française: résultats d'une enquête. Faune sauvage 274:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Boutin F, Mathon J, LeBrun T (2009) Impact of game crops intensification and huntingmanagement on red-legged partridge. In: Cederbaum S, Faircloth B, Terhun T, Thompson J, Carroll J (eds) Gamebird 2006: Quail VI and Perdix XII. 2006. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens, pp 124–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Putaala A, Hissa R (1998) Breeding dispersal and demography of wild and hand-reared grey partridges Perdix perdix in Finland. Wildl Biol 4:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S (1995) Monitoring bird populations by point counts. General Technical Report. PSW-GTR-149. In: Agriculture USDo (ed) Pacific Southwest Research Station. Canada, Forest Service, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz F (2003) Le statut communal de la perdrix grise et de la perdrix rouge en France: résultats d'une enquète. Faune sauvage 258:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Leukering T, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoppers J (1996) Cassetterecorder goed hulpmiddel bij inventarisatie Patrijs Perdix perdix in het broedseizoen: tape recorder useful in breeding season surveys of Partridge Perdix perdix. Limosa 69:180–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Seoane J, Carrascal LM (2007) Interspecific differences in population trends of Spanish birds are related to habitat and climatic preferences. Global Ecol Biogeogr 1:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner J (1985) Assessment of counting techniques. Curr Ornithol 2:247–302

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival rate estimation from both live and dead encounters. Bird study (Suppl) 46:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerling JR, Ankney CD (2000) A technique that increases detectability of passerine species during point counts. J Field Ornithol 71:638–649

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by ONCFS through conventions with FRC-LR and FDC 34. We are grateful to the members of ONCFS and FRC-LR staff, who participated to the field surveys, Laura Dami, Jean-Christian Favas, Jean-Bernard Puchala (ONCFS CNERA PFSP), as well as L. Tatin (Domaines de Listel). In 2009, some regional hunting societies tested our protocol, we are grateful to them. We thank the land owners for allowing the access during our field season.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Jakob.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakob, C., Ponce-Boutin, F., Besnard, A. et al. On the efficiency of using song playback during call count surveys of Red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa). Eur J Wildl Res 56, 907–913 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0388-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0388-7

Keywords

Navigation