Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flow simulation along a seal: the impact of an external device

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increasing number of marine mammal studies on physiology, behaviour and ecology rely on data, which have been collected from back-mounted devices, such as bio-logging tags and satellite transmitters. However, external devices may influence an animal’s hydrodynamics, behaviour and energy expenditure and, therefore, can impede the individual animal. To investigate the influence of external devices on seals, the water flow along a grey seal was simulated using computational fluid dynamics calculations. The simulations revealed several changes in forces and moments and thus balance, due to this device. The investigated satellite transmitter creates an average 12% increase of the drag coefficient. Additionally, there are significant relative transmitter-induced increases in pitching moment (32%) and lift (240%). The simulations also showed that the transmitter generates areas of decreased wall shear stress on the seal’s back. The results of this study demonstrate that external devices can change the hydrodynamics of the seal, which is expected to alter the seal’s physiology and behaviour and its use of the ecosystem. Long-term attachment may have adverse effects on the animal’s welfare. It is important to take these effects into consideration when studying tagged seals; otherwise, the value of the data obtained will be poor. Therefore, interpretations and extrapolations regarding ‘natural behaviour’ of animals in their ‘natural environment’ should only be made with great caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

Cd:

Drag coefficient

Cl:

Lift coefficient

Cm:

Pitching moment coefficient

D :

Drag force (N)

L :

Lift force (N)

M :

Pitching moment

ρ :

Fluid density (kg m−3)

U :

Swimming speed (m s−1)

A :

Frontal projection area (cm2)

α :

Pitch angle (°)

Ν :

Kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)

WSS:

Wall shear stress (N m2)

References

  • Aarts G, MacKenzie M, McConnell B, Fedak M, Matthiopoulos J (2008) Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography 31:40–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar Soto N, Johnson MP, Madsen PT, Díaz F, Domínguez I, Brito A, Tyack P (2008) Cheetahs of the deep sea: deep foraging sprints in short-finned pilot whales off Tenerife (Canary Islands). J Anim Ecol 77:936–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bannasch R, Wilson R, Culik B (1994) Hydrodynamic aspects of design and attachment of a back-mounted device in penguins. J Exp Biol 194:83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti S, Dall'Antonia L (2004) Foraging strategies of breeding seabirds studied by bird-borne data loggers. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Block BA (2005) Physiological ecology in the 21st century: advancements in biologging science. Integr Comp Biol 45:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call KA, Fadely BS, Greig A, Rehberg MJ (2007) At-sea and on-shore cycles of juvenile Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) derived from satellite dive recorders: a comparison between declining and increasing populations. Deep-Sea Res, Part 2, Top Stud Oceanogr 54:298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J, Kerry K (1994) The effects of monitoring procedures on Adélie penguin colonies. CCAMLR Sci 1:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll DA, Osmek SD, Bengston JL (1991) An effect of instrument attachment on foraging trip duration in Chinstrap penguins. Condor 93:771–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Culik BM, Luna-Jorquera G (1997) Satellite tracking of Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) in northern Chile. Mar Biol 128:547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culik B, Wilson RP (1991) Swimming energetics and performance of instrumented Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). J Exp Biol 158:355–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Culik BM, Bannasch R, Wilson RP (1994) External devices on penguins: how important is shape? Mar Biol 118:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken ML, Booth AJ, Smale MJ (2006) Preliminary observations of tag shedding, tag reporting, tag wounds, and tag biofouling for raggedtooth sharks (Carcharias taurus) tagged off the east coast of South Africa. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1640–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedak M (2004) Marine animals as platforms for oceanographic sampling: a “win/win” situation for biology and operational oceanography. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallon SL, Sparling CE, Georges JY, Fedak MA, Biuw M, Thompson D (2007) How fast does a seal swim? Variations in swimming behaviour under differing foraging conditions. J Exp Biol 210:3285–3294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford A, Compagno LJV, Levine M, Antoniou A (2007) Satellite tracking of whale sharks using tethered tags. Fish Res 84:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel NJ, Parrish JK, Conquest LL (2004) Effects of tagging on behavior, provisioning, and reproduction in the common murre (Uria aalge), a diving seabird. Auk (American Ornithologists Union) 121:1161–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins P (2004) Bio-logging and animal welfare: practical refinements. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:58–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays GC, Bradshaw CJA, James MC, Lovell P, Sims DW (2007) Why do Argos satellite tags deployed on marine animals stop transmitting? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 349:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays GC, Doyle TK, Houghton JDR, Lilley MKS, Metcalfe JD, Righton D (2008) Diving behaviour of jellyfish equipped with electronic tags. J Plankton Res 30:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy M, Chiaradia A, Kirkwood R, Dann P (2004) Balance: a neglected factor when attaching external devices to penguins. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker SK, Boyd IL (2003) Salinity sensors on seals: use of marine predators to carry CTD data loggers. Deep-Sea Res, Part 1, Oceanogr Res Pap 50:927–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JDR, Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Metcalfe JD, Hays GC (2002) Diving behaviour during the interesting interval for loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta nesting in Cyprus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell AB (1930) Aquatic mammals. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Igual JM, Forero MG, Tavecchia G, González-Solis J, Martínez-Abraín A, Hobson KA, Ruiz X, Oro D (2005) Short-term effects of data-loggers on Cory’s shearwater (Calonectris diomedea). Mar Biol 146:619–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koed A, Thorstad EB (2001) Long-term effect of radio-tagging on the swimming performance of pikeperch. J Fish Biol 58:1753–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooyman GL (2004) Genesis and evolution of bio-logging devices: 1963–2002. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H (2002) Computational biological fluid dynamics: digitizing and visualizing animal swimming and flying. Integr Comp Biol 42:1050–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann KJ, Luchi P, Hays GC (2008) Goal navigation and island-finding in sea turtles. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 356:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiopoulos J, McConnell B, Duck C, Fedak M (2004) Using satellite telemetry and aerial counts to estimate space use by grey seals around the British Isles. J Appl Ecol 41:476–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon CR, Field IC, Bradshaw CJA, White GC, Hindell MA (2008) Tracking and data-logging devices attached to elephant seals do not affect individual mass gain or survival. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 360:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DL, Fuller MR (2000) A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. In: Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology, controversies and consequences. Colombia University Press, New York, pp 15–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers AE, Lovell P, Hays GC (2006) Tools for studying animal behaviour: validation of dive profiles relayed via the Argos satellite system. Anim Behav 71:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naito Y (2004) Bio-logging science and new tools for marine bio-science. Proc. Int. Symp. SEASTAR 2000, Bio-logging Science 2004:72–75

  • Orthmann T (2000) Telemetrische Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung, zum Tauchverhalten und zur Tauchphysiologie von Seehunden (Phoca vitulina vitulina) des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Wattenmeeres. Dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany

  • Paredes R, Jones IL, Boness DJ (2005) Reduced parental care, compensatory behaviour and reproductive costs of thick-billed murres equipped with data loggers. Anim Behav 69:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie SA, Rogers KH (1996) Effects of harness-attached satellite transmitters on captive whitefaced ducks Dendrocygna viduata. S Afr J Wildl Res 26:93

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponganis PJ (2007) Bio-logging of physiological parameters in higher marine vertebrates. Deep-Sea Res, Part 2, Top Stud Oceanogr 54:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponganis PJ, van Dam RP, Knower T, Levenson DH, Ponganis KV (2004) Deep dives and aortic temperatures of emperor penguins: new directions for bio-logging at the isolated dive hole. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Read AJ, Westgate AJ (1997) Monitoring the movements of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) with satellite telemetry. Mar Biol 130:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP (2004) Subjectivity in bio-logging science: do logged data mislead? Mem Natl Inst Polar Res 58:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Bost CA, Handrich Y, Bevan RM, Butler PJ, Woakes AJ, Le Maho Y (2000) Impact of externally attached loggers on the diving behaviour of the king penguin. Physiol Biochem Zool 73:438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Baudat J, Bost CA, Le Maho Y, Naito Y (2001) Feeding strategies of free-ranging Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae analysed by multiple data recording. Polar Biol 24:460–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeone A, Wilson RP, Knauf G, Knauf W, Schützendübe J (2002) Effects of attached data-loggers on the activity budgets of captive Humboldt penguins. Zoo Biol 21:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelle LL, Blake RW, Trites AW (2000) Hydrodynamic drag in steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). J Exp Biol 203:1915–1923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart BS, Leatherwood SL, Yochem PK (1989) Harbor seal tracking and telemetry by satellite. Mar Mamm Sci 5:361–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SS, Leonard ML, Boness DJ, Majluf P (2001) Foraging trip duration increases for Humboldt penguins tagged with recording devices. J Avian Biol 32:369–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D, Fedak MA (1993) Cardiac responses of grey seals during diving at sea. J Exp Biol 174:139–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorstad EB, Okland F, Heggberget TG (2001) Are long term negative effects from external tags underestimated? Fouling of an externally attached telemetry transmitter. J Fish Biol 59:1092–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson KP, Granger RA (1998) Hydrodynamic effect of a satellite transmitter on a juvenile green turtle (Chelonia mydas). J Exp Biol 201:2497–2505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whidden SE, Williams CT, Breton AR, Buck CL (2007) Effects of transmitters on the reproductive success of tufted puffins. J Field Ornithol 78:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Grant WS, Duffy DC (1986) Recording devices on free-ranging marine animals: does measurement affect foraging performance? Ecology 67:1091–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Kreye JM, Lucke K, Urquhart H (2004) Antennae on transmitters on penguins: balancing energy budgets on the high wire. J Exp Biol 207:2649–2662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Pieter ‘t Hart for many useful discussions and valuable comments to previous versions of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Joanna M. Swabe for editing and improving the manuscript. We are grateful for the volunteers of the stranding network (EHBZ) of the SRRC, who always are available to help sick and wounded marine mammals. Their observations of animals with externally attached telemetry devices were very helpful. We thank IMARES B.V. for providing the dummy of the Argos Satellite Relay Data Logger (SMRU), which was used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seal Rehabilitation and Research Centre (SRRC), Hoofdstraat 94a, 9968AG, Pieterburen, The Netherlands

    Anja A. H. Hazekamp & Nynke Osinga

  2. FlowMotion Germany, Weenermoorer Strasse 193, 26826, Weener, Germany

    Roy Mayer

Authors
  1. Anja A. H. Hazekamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy Mayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nynke Osinga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nynke Osinga.

Additional information

Communicated by F.-J. Kaup

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazekamp, A.A.H., Mayer, R. & Osinga, N. Flow simulation along a seal: the impact of an external device. Eur J Wildl Res 56, 131–140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0293-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0293-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation