Abstract
We use data from three social groups of badgers (Meles meles) to illustrate how faecal DNA genotyping could be used in scent-marking studies. Faecal samples collected from latrines were genotyped to determine the individual identity and sex of badgers engaging in territorial behaviour and the frequency with which those individuals defecated at particular latrines. The method is potentially applicable to other species of carnivores that use latrines to mark their territories.
References
Begg CM, Begg KS, Du Toit JT, Mills MGL (2002) Scent-marking behaviour of the honey badger, Mellivora capensis (Mustelidae), in the southern Kalahari. Anim Behav 66:917–929
Bradley BJ, Chambers KE, Vigilant L (2001) Accurate DNA-based sex identification of apes using non-invasive samples. Conserv Genet 2:179–181
Brown JA, Cheeseman CL, Harris S (1992) Studies on the spread of bovine tuberculosis from badgers to cattle. J Zool (Lond) 227:694–696
Carpenter PJ, Dawson DA, Greig C, Parham A, Cheeseman C, Burke T (2003) Isolation of 39 polymorphic microsatellite loci and the development of a fluorescently labelled marker set for the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) (Carnivora: Mustelidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:610–615
Frantz AC (2004) Non-invasive genetic typing in the study of badger (Meles meles) ecology. D.Phil. thesis, University of Sussex, UK
Frantz AC, Pope LC, Carpenter PJ, Roper TJ, Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ, Burke T (2003) Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA. Mol Ecol 12:1649–1661
Frantz AC, Schaul M, Pope LC, Fack F, Schley L, Muller CP, Roper TJ (2004) Estimating population size by genotyping remotely plucked hair: the Eurasian badger. J Appl Ecol 41:985–995
Goossens B, Chikhi L, Utami SS, de Ruiter J, Bruford MW (2000) A multi-sample, multi-extracts approach for microsatellite analysis of faecal samples in an arboreal ape. Conserv Genet 1:157–162
Greenwood JJD (1996) Basic techniques. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques, a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–110
Kohn MH, Wayne RK (1997) Facts from feces revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 12:223–227
Roper TJ, Conradt L, Butler, J, Christian SE, Ostler JR, Schmid TK (1993) Territorial marking with faeces in badgers (Meles meles): a comparison of boundary and hinterland latrine use. Behaviour 127:289–307
Roper TJ, Shepherdson DJ, Davies JM (1986) Scent marking with faeces and anal secretions in the European badger (Meles meles): seasonal and spatial characteristics of latrine use in relation to territoriality. Behaviour 97:94–117
Schley L (2000) The badger Meles meles and the wild boar Sus scrofa: distribution and damage to agricultural crops in Luxembourg. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton
Stewart PD, Macdonald DW, Newman C, Tattersall FH (2002) Behavioural mechanisms of information transmission and reception by badgers, Meles meles, at latrines. Anim Behav 63:999–1007
Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goossens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N, Waits LP, Bouvet J (1996) Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3189–3194
Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379
Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256
Acknowledgements
We thank Edmée Engel, Guy Colling and Laurent Schley for their support on the project. We thank four anonymous referees for their comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Alain Frantz was supported by a Bourse de Formation-Recherche of the Luxembourg Government. Badgers were caught under licence, and the study complied with the Luxembourg law.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frantz, A.C., Fack, F., Muller, C.P. et al. Faecal DNA typing as a tool for investigating territorial behaviour of badgers (Meles meles). Eur J Wildl Res 52, 138–141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0016-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0016-0