Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of passages across a canal by wild mammals and related mortality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From 1993–1998, we monitored a 24.1-km long concrete water canal in northern Spain for drowned mammals. Along the canal, 14 concrete bridges and 9 small bridges permitted crossing by humans and livestock. Our objective was to test whether those bridges could be used as passages for wild animals to prevent drowning. We used tracks recorded in sand on bridges to identify species passing. Of the bridges, 65% were used by wild mammals; the 9 small bridges accounted for 57% of crossings by wild animals. Wild and domestic canids (Canis lupus, C.l. domesticus, Vulpes vulpes) were the main users (85%), followed by wild ungulates (mainly wild boar, Sus scrofa) at 71% of the crossings. Proximity to a mountain slope did not increase crossing in deer species, but did not hinder wild boars, foxes and wolves from doing so. Up to 88.1% of the wild mammalian species selected passages that were close to scrubland or forest. Of the drowned animals observed, 70% were dogs and livestock. More roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) drowned than other species, and 73% drowned between April and October. Throughout the year, 6.5% of wild boars fell into the canal . Foxes were the main species crossing the canal, but accounted for only 2.1% of drowned species. We recommend that the following action should be taken to reduce drowning: (1) bridges that are simpler and rustic in design should be constructed and (2) water catchments should be dug into the forest to provide water, so that animals do not need to use the canal as a water source or need to cross it to reach the river.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballon P (1984) Premières observations sur l’efficacité des passages à gibier sur l’autoroute A36. Bulletin Mensuel de l’Office National de la Chasse 76:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin JM, Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Doitran BB, Bodard S (1992) Home ranges and movements of roe deer fawns (Capreolus capreolus). In: Spitz F, Janeau G, Gonzalez G, Aulagnier S (eds) Ongulés/Ungulates ‘91. IRGN-INRE, Toulouse, pp 267–269

  • Costa L (1992) Una propuesta de gestión cinegética para el corzo en el Norte de Espańa. Ecología 6:165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa L (1995) First data on the size of North-Iberian roe bucks (Capreolus capreolus). Mammalia 59(3):447–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Curatolo JA, Murphy SM (1986) The effects of pipelines, roads, and traffic on the movements of caribou, Rangifer tarandus. Can Field Nat 100:218–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Désiré G, Mallet C (1991) T.V.G. atlantique: ouvrages de franchissement pour les ongulés et gestion de leurs abords. Bull Mensuel Office Natl Chasse 159:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster ML, Humphrey SR (1995) Use of highway underpasses by Florida panthers and other wildlife. Wildl Soc Bull 23:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausman PR, Leopold, BD, Rautenstrauch KR, Morgat JR, Etchberger RC (1992) Desert mule deer mortality and the Central Arizona Project. In: Brown RD (ed) The biology of deer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 43–47

  • Koubek P (1995) Home range dynamics and movement of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a floodplain forest. Folia Zool 44(3):215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader HJ (1984) Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol Conserv 29:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales J, Peris S, Pedraza E (2000) Utilización de pasos específicos de fauna y mortandad asociada en un canal de los páramos del Norte de Espańa (Guardo, Palencia). Galemys 12(1):25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet PC, Gibeau ML, Herrero S, Jorgenson J, Green J (1994) Wildlife corridors in the Bow River Valley, Alberta: a strategy for maintaining well-distributed, viable populations of wildlife. A report to the Bow River Valley Corridor Task Force, Alberta

  • Pedraza E, Peris S, Morales J (2002) El impacto sobre los ungulados de los canales de la comarca de Guardo (Palencia). Medio Ambiente en Castilla-León 17:36–42

  • PMVC-CODA (Proyecto Mortalidad Vertebrados Carreteras–Coordinadora Defensa Aves) (1993) Millones de animales mueren atropellados cada año en las carreteras españolas. Quercus 83:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautenstrauch KR, Krausman PR (1989) Preventing mule deer drowning in the Mohawk canal, Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull 17(3):281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez A (1999) Efectos de las carreteras sobre la fauna: un enfoque ecológico. In: Actas de Jornada Técnica y Debate sobre Fauna y Carreteras. Asociación Técnica de Carreteras, Madrid, pp 5–21

  • Rodriguez A, Crema G (2000) Las infraestructuras lineales y su efecto barrera sobre los vertebrados. Quercus 167:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez A, Crema G, Delibes M (1996) Use of non-wildlife passages across a high-speed railway by terrestrial vertebrates. J Appl Ecol 33:1257–1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez A, Crema G, Delibes M (1997) Factors affecting crossing of red foxes and wildcats through non-wildlife passages across a high-speed railway. Ecography 20:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JL (1993) Guía de campo de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Omega, Barcelona

  • Rosell C, Velasco JM (1999) Manual de prevenció i correcció dels impactes de les infraestructures viàries sobre la fauna. Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona

  • Rosell C, Fernández-Llario P, Herrero J (2001) El jabalí (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758). Galemys 13(2):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost GR, Bailey JA (1979) Distribution of mule deer and elk in relation to roads. J Wildl Manage 43:634–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz de Buruaga M, Costa L, Purroy FJ (1991) Distribution and abundance of three wild ungulates in the Cantabrian mountains of northern Spain. In: Perzanowski B, Regelin B (eds) Global trends in wildlife management. Jagielloinan University, Krakow, pp 627–630

  • San José C, Lovari S, Ferrari N (1997) Grouping in roe deer: an effect of habitat openness or cover distribution. Acta Theriol 42 (2): 235–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer F, Doherty J (1985) Managing mountain goats at a highway crossing. Wildl Soc Bull 13:469–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Teerink BJ (1991) Hair of west-European mammals. Atlas and identification key. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Tellería JL, Virgós E (1997) Distribution of an increasing roe deer population in a fragmented Mediterranean landscape. Ecography 20(3):247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Traverso JM, Álvarez A (2000) Mortalidad de vertebrados en el “Canal de las Dehesas”. Quercus 167:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Tull JC, Krausman PR (2001) Use of a wildlife corridor by desert mule deer. Southwest Nat 46(1):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JP, Bideau E, Quere JP, Angibault JM (1983) Occupation de l’espace chez le Chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus). 2. Cas des femelles. Acta Oecol/Oecol Appl 4:379–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanes M, Velasco JM, Suarez F (1995) Permeability of roads and railways to vertebrates: the importance of culverts. Biol Conserv 71:217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

E. Pedraza and the forest guards Mikel and Pedro helped in fieldwork. E. García (Environmental Service) gave permission to work in the area. Two anonymous referees made valuable comments on this manuscript. The study was funded by Iberdrola and the project Feder 1FD97-1468. This research complies with the current Spanish environmental legislation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvador Peris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peris, S., Morales, J. Use of passages across a canal by wild mammals and related mortality. Eur J Wildl Res 50, 67–72 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0045-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0045-0

Keywords

Navigation