Abstract
Considering the role of stomata in photosynthesis and dry matter production, an experiment was performed to investigate the stomata in vetch-barley intercropping and its relationship with dry forage production under rainfed conditions as influenced by biofertilizer azotobarvar‑1 and superabsorbent in two cropping years (2018 and 2019). One factor was intercropping with an alternative method (100% vetch, 100% barley, 75% vetch +25% barley, 50% vetch +50% barley, and 25% vetch +75% barley). Another factor included the application of biofertilizer and superabsorbent (Azotobarvar‑1, superabsorbent, superabsorbent+Azotobarvar‑1, and non-application of them). The results showed that stomata density and dimensions, net photosynthesis, dry forage yield, and the percentage and yield of crude protein in vetch and barley were affected by intercropping, Azotobarvar‑1, and superabsorbent in both years. In both years, increasing the density of intercrop component caused a decrement of stomata density and an increment of stomata dimensions in both plants. Intercropping increased net photosynthesis of vetch and barley and total dry forage yield compared to the monocropping. In different culture patterns, the application of superabsorbent+Azotobarvar‑1 raised photosynthesis. The highest total dry forage yield (3799 Kg ha−1) was related to the application of superabsorbent+Azotobarvar-1 at 50% vetch +50% barley in year 2019. The highest total forage crude protein yield in year 2018 (436 Kg ha−1) and in year 2019 (569 Kg ha−1) was related to the application of superabsorbent at the vetch monocropping system. In terms of total dry forage yield, the intercropping of 50% vetch +50% barley can be recommended as a suitable treatment. In total, Azotobarvar‑1 in line with the goals of sustainable agriculture and superabsorbent in order to store rainwater can increase the dry forage yield of vetch and barley and total forage crude protein yield.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allahdadi M, Raei Y, Bahreininejad B, Taghizadeh A, Narimani S (2021) Effects of biological fertilizers on some of the morphological and nutritional properties of globe artichoke. Iran Agric Res 39(2):47–56. https://doi.org/10.22099/IAR.2020.35209.1372
Anli M, Baslam M, Tahiri A, Raklami A, Symanczik S, Boutasknit A, Ait-El-Mokhtar M, Ben-Laouane R, Toubali S, Ait Rahou Y, Ait Chitt M, Oufdou K, Mitsui T, Hafidi M, Meddich A (2020) Biofertilizers as strategies to improve photosynthetic apparatus, growth, and drought stress tolerance in the date palm. Front Plant Sci 11:516818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.516818
Antunes WC, Provart NJ, Williams TC, Loureiro ME (2012) Changes in stomatal function and water use efficiency in potato plants with altered sucrolytic activity. Plant Cell Environ 35(4):747–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02448.x
Armand N, Amiri H, Ismaili A (2016) Interaction of methanol spray and water-deficit stress on photosynthesis and biochemical characteristics of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Sadry. Photochem Photobiol 92:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12548
Artik C (2005) The effects of gamma radiation on some plant characteristics and seed yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in M1 and M2 generations. M.S.c Dissertation ondokuz Mayls university, Samsun
Atis I, Kokten K, Hatipoglu R, Yilmaz S, Atak M, Can E (2012) Plant density and mixture ratio effects on the competition between common vetch and wheat. Aust J Crop Sci 6(3):498–505
Bacchi M, Monti M, Calvi A, Presti LE, Pellicanò A, Preiti G (2021) Forage potential of cereal/legume intercrops: agronomic performances, yield, quality forage and LER in two harvesting times in a Mediterranean environment. Agronomy 11:121. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010121
Birjandi N, Papi S, Cheraghali Z, Moradifard E (2019) Application of data envelopment analysis method to study the dust phenomenon in Lorestan province. Int J Data Envel Anal 7(2):81–96
Carpici EB (2017) Determination of forage yield and quality of mixtures of hairy vetch with some cereals (oat, barley and wheat) grown as catch crop. Legum Res 40:1088–1092. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0i0.8402
Cowden RJ, Shah AN, Lehmann LM, Kiær LP, Henriksen CB, Ghaley BB (2020) Nitrogen fertilizer effects on pea-barley intercrop productivity compared to sole crops in Denmark. Sustainability 12(22):9335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229335
Duchene O, Vian JF, Celette F (2017) Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 240:148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.019
Estrada-Prado W, Chávez-Suárez L, Maceo-Ramos YC, Jerez-Mompie E, Nápoles-García MC (2021) Efecto del Azofert®-F en la respuesta estomática del frijol ante el déficit hídrico. Agron Mesoam 32(2):442–451. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v32i2.42001
Frasier I, Noellemeyer E, Amiotti N, Quiroga A (2017) Vetch-rye biculture is a sustainable alternative for enhanced nitrogen availability and low leaching losses in a no-till cover crop system. Field Crop Res 214:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.016
Gunes A, Kitir N, Turan M, Elkoca E, Yildirim E, Avci N (2016) Evaluation of effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and phosphorus fertilizer efficiency. Turk J Agric For 40(3):365–378. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1511-126
Habibi D, Kashani A, Paknejad F, Jafary H, Al-Ahmadi MJ, Tookalloo MR, Lamei J (2010) Evaluation of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) in pure and mixed cropping with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to determine the best combination of legume and cereal for forage production. Am J Agric Biol Sci 5(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2010.169.176
Hlahla JM, Mafa MS, van der Merwe R, Alexander O, Duvenhage MM, Kemp G, Moloi MJ (2022) The photosynthetic efficiency and carbohydrates responses of six edamame (Glycine max. L. Merrill) cultivars under drought stress. Plants 11(3):394. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030394
Htwe AZ, Moh SM, Soe KM, Moe K, Yamakawa T (2019) Effects of biofertilizer produced from Bradyrhizobium and Streptomyces griseoflavus on plant growth, nodulation, nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake, and seed yield of mung bean, cowpea, and soybean. Agronomy 9(2):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020077
Huang Z, Liu Q, An B, Wu X, Sun L, Wu P, Liu B, Ma X (2021) Effects of planting density on morphological and photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in different positions on Cunninghamia lanceolata saplings. Forests 12:853. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070853
Hughes J, Hepworth C, Dutton C, Dunn JA, Hunt L, Stephens J, Waugh R, Cameron DD, Gray JE (2017) Reducing stomatal density in barley improves drought tolerance without impacting on yield. Plant Physiol 174(2):776–787. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01844
Hwang HY, Kim GW, Lee YB, Kim PJ, Kim SY (2015) Improvement of the value of green manure via mixed hairy vetch and barley cultivation in temperate paddy soil. Field Crop Res 183:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.08.001
Ibrahim AT, Acikalin S (2020) Yield, quality and competition properties of grass pea and wheat grown as pure and binary mixture in different plant densities. Turk J Field Crop 25(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.737476
Javanmard A, Shekari F, Deganian H (2014) Evaluation of forage yield and competition indices for intercropped barley and legumes. Int J Agric Biosyst Eng 8(2):193–196. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1108434
Javanmard A, Machiani MA, Lithourgidis A, Morshedloo MR, Ostadi A (2020) Intercropping of maize with legumes: A cleaner strategy for improving the quantity and quality of forage. Clean Eng Technol 1:100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100003
Jensen ES, Carlsson G, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2020) Intercropping of grain legumes and cereals improves the use of soil N resources and reduces the requirement for synthetic fertilizer N: A global-scale analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 40(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-0607-x
Jilani M, Ajam Norouzi H, Faraji A (2019) Effects of seed plant on quantitative and qualitative yields of vetch and barley in different mixing ratios. Int Trans J Eng Manage App Sci Technol 10(12):1–10. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11301749
Kallço I, Susaj E, Susaj L, Susaj ML (2013) Effects of a super absorbent polymer on ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum lam.) forage production under rain-fed conditions in the region of Korça, in south-eastern Albania. Int Interdiscip Res J III:22–29
Khadem SA, Galavi M, Ramrodi M, Mousavi SR, Rousta MJ, Rezvani-Moghadam P (2010) Effect of animal manure and superabsorbent polymer on corn leaf relative water content, cell membrane stability and leaf chlorophyll content under dry condition. Aust J Crop Sci 4(8):642–647
Khosravi Shakib A, Rezaei Nejad A, Khandan Mirkohi A, Kalate JS (2019) Vermicompost and manure compost reduce water-deficit stress in pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L. cv. Candyman Orange). Compost Sci Util 27(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2019.1602489
Kir H (2021) Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 45(3):419–426. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2005-45
Kir H (2022) Determining the proper sowing time for the mixture of Hungarian vetch and triticale under continental climate conditions. Cienc Rural 52(2):e20201115. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20201115
Kir H, Yilar M, Yavuz T (2022) Comparison of alternative sowing methods in Hungarian vetch and triticale cultivation in terms of yield and weed biomass. Gesunde Pflanz. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00696-1
Kordi S, Shafagh Kolvanagh J, Zehtab Salmasi S, Daneshvar M (2017) Evaluation of yield and some physiological traits of forage corn affected by chemical and biological nitrogen fertilizers intercropped with sweet basil. J Cent Eur Agric 18(2):477–493. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/18.2.1921
Kumari S, Solanki NS, Dashora LN, Upadhyay B (2017) Effect of super absorbent polymer and plant geometry on growth and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6(4):179–181
Kusvuran A, Kaplan M, Nazli RI (2014) Intercropping of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under different plant varieties and mixture rates. Legum Res 37:590–599. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2014.00682.1
Lamochi S, Sakinejad T (2019) Evaluation seed yield, its components and morphological traits of corn in response of consume super absorbent polymers and nitroxin. J Crop Nutr Sci 5(1):18–32
Li T, Liu LN, Jiang CD, Liu YJ, Shi L (2014) Effects of mutual shading on the regulation of photosynthesis in field-grown sorghum. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 137:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.04.022
Li Y, Shi H, Zhang H, Chen S (2019) Amelioration of drought effects in wheat and cucumber by the combined application of super absorbent polymer and potential biofertilizer. PeerJ 7:e6073. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6073
Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD (2006) Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crop Res 99(2–3):106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
Lithourgidis AS, Dhima KV, Vasilakoglou IB, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD (2007) Sustainable production of barley and wheat by intercropping common vetch. Agron Sustain Dev 27:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2006033
Llorente BE, Alasia MA, Larraburu EE (2016) Biofertilization with Azospirillum brasilense improves in vitro culture of Handroanthus ochraceus, a forestry, ornamental and medicinal plant. N Biotechnol 33:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2015.07.006
Luis CPJ, Hugo RR, Miguel TQ, Ruth AQY, James CC (2020) Productive and nutritional aspects of forages oats and barley alone and consociated to vetch in high Andean conditions. MOJ Food Proc Technol 8(2):59–65. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojfpt.2020.08.00243
Martin XM, Sumathi CS, Kannan VR (2011) Influence of agrochemicals and Azotobacter sp. application on soil fertility in relation to maize growth under nursery conditions. Eur Asian J Biosci 5:19–28
Mathobo R, Marais D, Steyn JM (2017) The effect of drought stress on yield, leaf gaseous exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agric Water Manag 180:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.005
Mohamed IA, Shalby N, Bai C, Qin M, Agami RA, Jie K, Zhou G (2020) Stomatal and photosynthetic traits are associated with investigating sodium chloride tolerance of Brassica napus L. cultivars. Plants 9(1):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9010062
Mohammadpoor G, Ghobadi M, Mohammadi G, Ghobadi M (2017) Effects of different amounts of nitrogen and Azotobarvar on growth characteristics and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Agroecol 9(1):129–141. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v9i1.49337 (In Persian with English abstract)
Mohsenabadi GR, Jahansooz MR, Chaichi MR, Rahimian H, Liaghat A, Savaghebi GR (2008) Evaluation of barley-vetch intercrop at different nitrogen rates. J Agric Sci Technol 10(1):23–31
Montesano FF, Parente A, Santamaria P, Sannino A, Serio F (2015) Biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogel increases water etention properties of growing media and Plant growth. Agric Agric Sci Proc 4:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.03.052
Moradzadeh S, Siavash Moghaddam S, Rahimi A, Pourakbar L, El Enshasy HA, Sayyed RZ (2021) Bio-chemical fertilizer improves the oil yield, fatty acid compositions, and macro-nutrient contents in Nigella sativa L. Horticulturae 7(10):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100345
Neumann A, Werner J, Rauber R (2009) Evaluation of yield-density relationships and optimization of intercrop compositions of field-grown pea-oat intercrops using the replacement series and the response surface design. Field Crop Res 114:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.08.013
Nilson SE, Assmann SM (2007) The control of transpiration. Insights from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.093161
Parsa H, Kheiry A, Sanikhani M, Razavi F (2021) Effect of various nitrogen sources on yield, antioxidant activity and active substances of Crocus sativus L. Acta Hortic 1315:537–542. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1315.79
Peksen E, Aysun P, Cengiz A (2006) Comparison of leaf and stomata characteristics in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). J Biol Sci 6(2):360–364. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2006.360.364
Peter F, Satish AB (2015) Effect of biofertilizer on the growth of mungbean Vigna radiata (L, Wilczek). Int Res J Sci Eng 3(2):51–54
Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Saed-Moucheshi A, Pakniyat H, Pessarakli M (2016) Stomatal responses to drought stress. In: Ahmad P (ed) Water stress and crop plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 24–40
Raei Y, Sayyadi Ahmadabad M, Ghassemigolezani K, Ghassemi S (2020) Pinto bean and black mustard responses to bio-fertilizers under intercropping system. Adv Hortic Sci 34(2):175182. https://doi.org/10.13128/ahsc-7407
Rahim FP, Alejandra MTT, Manuel VZV, Elías JTR, Maginot NH (2021) Stomatal traits and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) forage yield in drought conditions of Northeastern Mexico. Plants 10(7):1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071318
Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004) Drought-induced response of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 161:1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
Rehman A, Ahmad R, Safdar M (2011) Effect of hydrogel on the performance of aerobic rice sown under different techniques. PLANT SOIL ENVIRON 57:321–325. https://doi.org/10.17221/81/2011-PSE
Ren B, Liu W, Zhang J, Dong S, Liu P, Zhao B (2017) Effects of plant density on the photosynthetic and chloroplast characteristics of maize under high-yielding conditions. Sci Nat 104:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1445-9
Renzi JP, Chantre GR, Smýkal P, Presotto AD, Zubiaga L, Garayalde AF, Cantamutto MA (2020) Diversity of naturalized hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) populations in central Argentina as a source of potential adaptive traits for breeding. Front Plant Sci 11:189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00189
Salama HSA, Zeid KMMK (2016) Hay quality evaluation of summer grass and legume forage monocultures and mixtures grown under irrigated conditions. Aust J Crop Sci 10(11):1543–1550. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.11.PNE113
Salama HSA, El-Karamity DES, Nawar AL (2016) Additive intercropping of wheat, barley, and faba bean with sugar beet: Impact on yield, quality and land use efficiency. Egypt J Agron 38(3):413–430. https://doi.org/10.21608/AGRO.2016.1277
Satriani A, Catalano M, Scalcione E (2018) The role of superabsorbent hydrogel in bean crop cultivation under deficit irrigation conditions: a case-study in southern Italy. Agric Water Manag 195:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.10.008
Seyedeh HD, Kashani A, Paknejad F, Jafary H, Al-Ahmadi MJ, Tookalloo MR, Lamei J (2010) Evaluation of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) in pure and mixed cropping with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to determine the best combination of legume and cereal for forage production. Am J Agric Biol Sci 5(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2010.169.176
Sutradhar SC, Khan MMR, Rahman MM, Dafadar NC (2015) The synthesis of superabsorbent polymers from a carboxymethylcellulose/acrylic acid blend using gamma radiation and its application in agriculture. J Phys Sci 26(2):23–39
Thorne SJ, Hartley SE, Maathuis FJM (2020) Is silicon a panacea for alleviating drought and salt stress in crops? Front Plant Sci 11:1221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01221
Verma KK, Song XP, Zeng Y, Li DM, Guo DJ, Rajput VD, Chen GL, Barakhov A, Minkina TM, Li YR (2020) Characteristics of leaf stomata and their relationship with photosynthesis in Saccharum officinarum under drought and silicon application. ACS Omega 5(37):24145–24153. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03820
Wang X, Yang Y, Zhao J, Nie J, Zang H, Zeng Z, Olesen JE (2020) Yield benefits from replacing chemical fertilizers with manure under water deficient conditions of the winter wheat-summer maize system in the North China Plain. Eur J Agron 119:126118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126118
Wayman S, Kissing Kucek L, Mirsky SB, Ackroyd V, Cordeau S, Ryan MR (2016) Organic and conventional farmers differ in their perspectives on cover crop use and breeding. Renew Agric Food Syst 32(40):376–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170516000338
Wen P, Zhansheng W, Yanhui H, Bang-Ce Y, Yajie H, Xinyuan G (2016) Microwave-assisted synthesis of a semi-interpenetrating polymer network slow-release nitrogen fertilizer with water absorbency from cotton stalks. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(12):6572–6579. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01466
Westerman RL (1990) Soil testing and plant analysis. Madison. Soil Science Society of America, No. 3
Xu Z, Zhou G (2008) Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot 59(12):3317–3325. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern185
Yang F, Cen R, Feng W, Liu J, Qu Z, Miao Q (2020) Effects of super-absorbent polymer on soil remediation and crop growth in arid and semi-arid areas. Sustainability 12(18):7825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187825
Yang H, Chai Q, Yin W, Hu F, Qin A, Fan Z, Yu A, Zhao C, Fan H (2021) Yield photosynthesis and leaf anatomy of maize in inter- and mono-cropping systems at varying plant densities. Crop J 10(3):893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.09.010
Yaseen R, Hegab R, Kenawey M, Eissa D (2020) Effect of super absorbent polymer and bio fertilization on maize productivity and soil fertility under drought stress conditions. Egypt J Soil Sci 60(4):377–395. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2020.35386.1372
Yilmaz Ş, Ozel A, Atak M, Erayman M (2015) Effects of seeding rates on competition indices of barley and vetch intercropping systems in the Eastern Mediterranean. Turk J Agric For 39(1):135–143. https://doi.org/10.3906/TAR-1406-155
Yu YY, Li SM, Qiu JP, Li JG, Luo YM, Guo JH (2019) Combination of agricultural waste compost and biofertilizer improves yield and enhances the sustainability of a pepper field. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 182(4):560–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201800223
Zhang D, Sun Z, Feng L, Bai W, Yang N, Zhang Z, Zhang L (2020) Maize plant density affects yield, growth and source-sink relationship of crops in maize/peanut intercropping. Field Crop Res 257:107926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107926
Zhang L, Niu H, Wang S, Zhu X, Luo C, Li Y, Zhao X (2012) Gene or environment? Species-specific control of stomatal density and length. Ecol Evol 2(5):1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.233
Zhang YP, Wang ZM, Wu YC, Zhang X (2006) Stomata characteristics of different green organs in wheat under different irrigation regimes. Acta Agron Sin 32:70–75
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of Zabol, Iran for supporting the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
N. Zeiditoolabi, I. Khammari, A. Sirousmehr, M. Daneshvar, M. Galavi and M. Dahmardeh declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals “Not applicable”. Ethical Approval “Not applicable”. Consent to Participate “Not applicable”. Consent to Publish “Not applicable”.
Additional information
Data Accessibility
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature oder sein Lizenzgeber (z.B. eine Gesellschaft oder ein*e andere*r Vertragspartner*in) hält die ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechte an diesem Artikel kraft eines Verlagsvertrags mit dem/den Autor*in(nen) oder anderen Rechteinhaber*in(nen); die Selbstarchivierung der akzeptierten Manuskriptversion dieses Artikels durch Autor*in(nen) unterliegt ausschließlich den Bedingungen dieses Verlagsvertrags und dem geltenden Recht.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeiditoolabi, N., Khammari, I., Sirousmehr, A. et al. Evaluation of Stomata in Vetch-Barley Intercropping and Its Relationship with Forage Production in Rainfed Conditions, Under the Influence of Biofertilizer and Superabsorbent. Gesunde Pflanzen 75, 2045–2073 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00838-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00838-z