Abstract
This paper provides insights into foresters’ perceptions of forest recreation and its management. It is based on qualitative interviews with foresters in Berlin and the region of Stuttgart, Germany (N = 16). The results highlight the lack of strategic planning concerned with recreation management at both locations. Moreover, recreation management seems to depend mostly on the local forester in charge. Foresters’ perceptions of recreation, in turn, appear to be closely linked with how they perceive their work. Three narratives of the foresters’ self-perception are constructed that address three key items: perception of foresters’ skills and tasks, perception of the societal and political context of the foresters’ work and of their own scope of action in this context, and visions for future recreation management. The first narrative emphasises classical forestry and silvicultural aspects; the second understands foresters as multifunctional service providers for communal clients; and the last criticises the classical orientation of forestry and highlights new challenges for foresters in urban areas. These three views of recreation management in urban forests relate to classical forestry culture in different ways: either embodying this culture; differentiating from it; or adopting a new view which challenges this culture. Further research needs are discussed. The paper lastly argues for increased awareness of the importance of the social dimensions of forest management as one of the crucial future challenges for the forestry profession.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anders K (2003) Förster und Naturschützer: Thesen zum Verhältnis zweier Akteursgruppen. Bornimer Agrartech Ber 33:58–71
Behan RW (1966) The myth of the omnipotent forester. J For 6:398–407
Bell S, Tyrväinen L, Sieväinen T, Pröbstl U, Simpson M (2007) Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: a European perspective. Living Rev Landsc Res 1(2). URL: http://livingreviews.org/lrlr-2007-2, accessed 5 Jan 2012
Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
BMELF (1998) Sammlung forstlicher Fachbegriffe. Deutsch—Englisch, 4th edn. Bundeministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Bonn
Boutefeu B (2008) La forêt, théâtre de nos émotions. ONF Rendez-vous techniques 19, Paris
Duerr WA, Duerr JB (1975) The role of faith in forest resource management. In: Rumsey F, Duerr WA (eds) Social sciences in forestry. A book of readings. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 30–41
EC (2006) Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament on an EU forest action plan. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 15.6.2006, SEC (2006) 748, COM (2006) 302 final
Edwards D, Jay M, Jensen F, Lucas B, Marzano M, Montagne C, Peace A, Weiss G (2012) Public preferences across Europe for different forest stand types as sites for recreation. Ecol Soc 17(1):27
Glück P (1987) Social values in forestry. Ambio 16(2–3):158–160
Glück P, Pleschberger W (1982) Das Harmoniedenken in der Forstpolitik. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 7:650–655
Goodstadt V (2011) The planning of green networks: making the connections. In: Keynote address at the 14th European forum on urban forestry, 1–4 June, Glasgow
Heeg B (1973) Zur Soziologie der Forstbeamten. Eine Studie über die Organisationsreform der Landesforstverwaltungen. Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwig-Unibersität, Band 11, Freiburg
Helfferich C (2005) Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer interviews, 2nd edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, p 193
Jay M, Schraml U (2009) Understanding the role of urban forests for migrants—uses, perception and integrative potential. Urban For Urban Green 8:283–294
Jensen FS (1994) Landscape managers’ and politicians’ perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population. For Landsc Res 1:79–93
Jensen FS, Koch NE (2004) Twenty-five years of forest recreation research in Denmark and its influence on forest policy. Scand J For Res 19(Suppl 4):93–102
Johnston M, Shimada LD (2004) Urban forestry in a multicultural society. J Arboric 30(3):185–192
Kennedy JJ, Dombeck MP, Koch NE (1998) Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the Western world at the close of the twentieth century. Unasylva 49(192):16–26
Koch NE, Kennedy JJ (1991) Multiple-use forestry for social values. Ambio 20(7):330–333
Konijnendijk CC (2003) A decade of urban forestry in Europe. For Policy Econ 5:173–186
Konijnendijk CC (2008) The forest and the city. The cultural landscape of urban woodland. Springer, Berlin, p 245
Konijnendijk C, Nilsson K, Randrup T, Schipperijn J (eds) (2005) Urban forests and trees. A reference book. Springer, Berlin
Mann C, Schraml U (2006) Anwendung und Eignung eines Konfliktanalysemodells für das Management von Erholungsräumen. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 12:224–234
Mann C, Pouta E, Gentin S, Jensen FS (2010) Outdoor recreation in forest policy and legislation. Urban For Urban Green 9(4):303–312
MCPFE (2003a) Improved pan-European indicators for sustainable forest management as adopted by the MCPFE expert level meeting 7–8 October 2002, Vienna, Austria. MCPFE Liaison Unit, Vienna
MCPFE (2003b) Background information for improved pan-European indicators for sustainable forest management. MCPFE Liaison Unit, Vienna
Mead GH (1934) Mind, self and society. University Press, Chicago, p 400
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 338
Oesten G (1978) Untersuchungen zur Sozialisation von Nachwuchsmitgliedern für die Forstverwaltungen. Dissertation, University of Freiburg
Peters K, Elands B, Buijs A (2010) Social interactions in urban parks: stimulating social cohesion? Urban For Urban Green 9:93–100
Pregernig M (2001) Values of forestry professionals and their implications for the applicability of policy instruments. Scand J For Res 16:278–288
Pröbstl U, Wirth V, Elands B, Bell S (eds) (2010) Management of recreation and nature based tourism in European forests. Springer, Berlin, p 336
Richardson L (1990) Writing strategies. Reaching diverse audiences. Qualitative research methods, vol 1. Sage, Newbury Park
Rupf H (1960) Wald und Mensch im Geschehen der Gegenwart. In: Jahresbericht des Deutschen Forstvereins. Landwirtschaftsverlag G.m.b.H., Hiltrup bei Münster (Westf.), pp 30–45
Schanz H (1996) Forstliche Nachhaltigkeit. Sozialwissenschaftliche analyse der Begriffsinhalte und- funktionen. Schriften aus dem Institut für Forstökonomie Band 4, Freiburg
Schmidt S (1999) Institutionenökonomische analyse der staatlichen Forstwirtschaft in Deutschland: die Bedeutung formeller und informeller Institutionen. Dissertation, University of Freiburg
Schraml U (2011) Waldnaturschutz mit Zukunft. Natur und Landschaft 6:261–264
Schraml U (2012) Was wollen wir? Waldnutzung nach ökologischen, sozialen oder kulturellen Standards? In: Müller M, Hirschmann M (eds) Wald—mehr als Holz. Nutzungsoptionen und Gestaltung unserer Wälder. Loccumer Protokolle 54/11, Rehberg-Loccum, pp 155–176
Simpson MC, Pichler V, Tyrväinen L, Collins K, Martin S, Strange N, Vuletic D (eds) (2008) The economic and social values of forests for recreation and nature tourism: a research overview. Working Group one, EU COST Action E33 FORREC, Cost Office, p 86
Strübing J (2006) Theoretisches sampling. In: Bohnsack R, Marotzki W, Meuser M (eds) Hauptbegriffe qualitativer Sozialforschung, 2nd edn. Verlag Barbara Budrich, Opladen, pp 154–156
Suda M, Krause E (2010) Die Berliner und ihr Wald. LWF aktuell 75(2010):56–59
Verband Region Stuttgart (2010) Einwohner und Fläche. Bevölkerungsentwicklungen. http://www.region-stuttgart.org/vrs/main.jsp?navid=104. Retrieved 7 Sep 2010
Warkotsch W (2001) Forstliches Wörterbuch, deutsch–englisch. Verlag Dr. Kessel, Remagen-Oberwinter, p 222
Westermayer T (2010) Staatliche Forstverwaltungen im Wandel. Organisationsreformen und Geschlecht. In: Hehn M, Katz C, Mayer M, Westermayer T (eds) Abschied vom grünen Rock. Forstverwaltungen, waldbezogene Umweltbildung und Geschlechterverhältnisse im Wandel. Oekom, München, pp 121–146
Winkel G (2007) Waldnaturschutzpolitik in Deutschland. Bestandaufnahme, Analysen und Entwurf einer Story-line. Freiburger Schriften zur Forst- und Umweltpolitik Bd. 13, Freiburg
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this paper has been funded by the Graduate School “Environment, Society and Global Change” of the Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Freiburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by G. Brazaitis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jay, M., Schraml, U. Managing city forests for or in spite of recreation? Perspectives of forest managers. Eur J Forest Res 132, 93–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0658-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0658-x