Abstract
The purpose of this research is to study the avoidable damage from forest fires in the most affected European Union (EU) Member States (MS) using a quantitative model based on a non-parametric efficient frontier technique, namely data envelopment analysis (DEA). The procedure allows the comparison of forest fire damage in EU countries by computing relative efficiency scores and quantifying improvement targets. The proposed DEA model evaluates a slacks-based measure of efficiency and considers two non-discretionary variables (the forest area of the countries and fire weather index). Data from the most affected EU countries over the period 2005–2010 have been used. An input-oriented model has been considered in order to take into account the number of fire events and total burned area as the fire management targets. The study finds evidence that there is a considerable excess of forest area affected by fire in most of the EU countries. The empirical results also suggest that the mean relative damage efficiency in Southern European MS and Other MS is not significantly different. From the efficiency scores, different clusters, with clear characteristic features, emerge. The next step is to extend the best practices of the efficient EU countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albers J (2012) Comparative analysis of the forest fire situation in Central-Eastern Europe. Masters Thesis, Institute of Silviculture Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna. https://www.uef.fi
Banker RD, Morey R (1986) Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper Res 34:513–521
Banker RD, Charnes RF, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092
Bogetoft P, Thorsen BJ, Strange N (2003) Efficiency and merger gains in the Danish Forestry Extension Service. For Sci 49:585–595
Camia A, Amatulli G (2009) Weather factors and fire danger in the Mediterranean. In: Chuvieco E (ed) Earth observation of wildland fires in Mediterranean ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–82
Camia A, Barbosa P, Amatulli G, San-Miguel-Ayanz J (2006) Fire danger rating in the European forest fire information system (EFFIS): current developments. For Ecol Manag 234:S20
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–449
Chuvieco E, Salas FJ, Carvacho L, Rodriguez-Silva F (1999) Integrated fire danger mapping. In: Chuvieco E (ed) Remote sensing of large wildfires. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 65–84
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2004) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer, Berlin
Croitoru L (2007) How much are Mediterranean forests worth? For Policy Econ 9:536–545
Díaz-Delgado R, Lloret F, Pons X (2004) Spanish patterns of fire occurrence in Catalonia, NE, Spain. Landsc Ecol 19:731–745
EM-DAT (2012) The International Disaster Database. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). http://www.emdat.be/. Accessed 4 June 2012
European Commission (2004) Forest fires in Europe 2003, S.P.I.04.124 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
European Commission (2006) Forest fires in Europe 2005, EUR 22312 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
European Commission (2007) Forest fires in Europe 2006, EUR 22931 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
European Commission (2009) Forestry Statistics 2009, Eurostat. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-78-09-993/EN/KS-78-09-993-EN.PDF. Accessed 1 June 2012
European Commission (2011) Forest fires in Europe 2010, EUR 24910 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2005) Global forest resources assessment 2005: The United Nations, Rome, 2005. http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2005/en/. Accessed 1 June 2012
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010: The United Nations, Rome, 2010. http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/. Accessed 1 June 2012
Giglio L, van der Werf GR, Randerson JT, Gollatz GJ, Kasibhatla P (2006) Global estimation of burned area using MODIS active fire observations. Atmos Chem Phys 6:957–974
González JR, Pukkala T (2007) Characterization of forest fires in Catalonia (north-east Spain). Eur J For Res 126:421–429
Gossow, H, Hafellner R, Arndt N (2007) More forest fires in the Austrian Alps—a real coming danger? In: Borsdorf A, Stötter J, Veuillet E (eds) Managing alpine future—proceedings of the Innsbruck conference, 15–17 Oct 2007, pp 356–362
Gossow H, Hafellner R, Vacik H, Huber T (2008) Major Fire Issues in the Euro-Alpine Region—the Austrian Alps. UNECE/FAO Int For Fire News 38:101–110
Granström A (1998) Forest fire and fire management in Sweden. UNECE/FAO Int For Fire News 18:75–77
Iliadis LS, Papastavrou AK, Lefakis PD (2002) A computer-system that classifies the prefectures of Greece in forest fire risk zone using fuzzy sets. For Policy Econ 4:43–54
Ioannou AP, Papageorgiou KA (2007) Forest fire management in Cyprus: from prevention to restoration. In: 4th International wild land fire conference, 15 May 2007, Seville. http://www.fire.uni-freiburg.de/sevilla-2007/contributions/doc/SESIONES_TEMATICAS/ST2/Ioannou_Papageorgiou_CHIPRE.pdf
Kalabokidis KD, Koutsias N, Konstantinidis P, Vasilakos C (2007) Multivariate analysis of landscape wildfire dynamics in a Mediterranean ecosystem of Greece. Area 39:392–402
Kao C (2010) Malmquist productivity index based on common weights DEA: the case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega 38:484–491
Kao C, Hung HT (2005) Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J Oper Res Soc 56:1196–1203
Kao C, Yang YC (1991) Reorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurement. For Sci 37:1239–1252
Kao C, Yang YC (1992) Measuring the efficiency of forest management. Eur J Oper Res 58:356–362
Kao C, Chang PL, Hwang SN (1993) Data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of forest management. J Environ Manag 38:73–83
Korkmaz M (2011) Measuring the productive efficiency of forest enterprises in Mediterranean Region of Turkey using data envelopment analysis. Afr J Agric Res 6:4522–4532
Li Y, Zhang D, Nagubadi RV (2008) Productivity in the U.S. and Canadian sawmill industries: a nonparametric programming analysis. For Prod J 58:33–40
Loomis JBT, Brown B, Lucero B, Peterson G (1996) Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay. Land Econ 72:450–461
Marinescu MV, Sowlati T, Maness TC (2005) The development of a timber allocation model using data envelopment analysis. Can J For Res 35:2304–2315
Martell DL (2001) Forest fire management. In: Johnson A, Miyanishi K (eds) Forest fires: behaviour and ecological effects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 527–583
Martell DL, Gunn EA, Weintraub A (1998) Forest management challenges for operational researches. Eur J Oper Res 104:1–17
MCPFE (2007) State of Europe’s forests 2007. The MCPFE Report on Sustainable Forest Management in Europe, Jointly prepared by the MCPFE Liaison Unit Vienna and UNECE/FAO. G., (5–7 Nov 2007, Warsaw, Poland)
Nabuurs GJ, Schelhaas MJ, Pussinen A (2000) Validation of the European Forest Information Scenario Model (EFISCEN) and a projection of Finnish forests. Silva Fennica 34:167–179
Nabuurs GJ, Päivinen R, Schanz H (2001) Sustainable management regimes for Europe’s forests—a projection with EFISCEN until 2015. For Policy Econ 3:155–173
Niklasson M, Granström A (2004) Fire in Sweden—history, research, prescribed burning and forest certification. UNECE/FAO Int For Fire News 30:80–83
Nyrud AQ, Bergsen ER (2002) Production efficiency and size in Norwegian sawmilling. Scand J For Res 17:566–575
Pastor JT, Ruiz JL, Sirvant R (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115:596–607
Riera P, Mogas J (2004) Evaluation of a risk reduction in forest fires in a Mediterranean region. For Policy Econ 6:521–528
Salehirad N, Sowlati T (2007) Dynamic efficiency analysis of primary wood producers in British Columbia. Math Comput Model 45:1179–1188
San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Camia A (2009) Forest fires at a glance: facts, figures and trends in the EU. In: Birot Y (ed) Living with wildfires: what science can tell us. A contribution to the science-policy dialogue. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 11–18
Sebastián-López A, Salvador-Civil R, Gonzalo-Jiménez J, SanMiguel-Ayanz J (2008) Integration of socioeconomic and environmental variables for modelling long-term fire danger in Southern Europe. Eur J For Res 127:149–163
Sowlati T (2005) Efficiency studies in forestry using data envelopment analysis. For Prod J 55:49–57
Spanish Ministry of Environment (1999) Spanish forestry strategy. http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/temas/montes-y-politica-forestal/sfs_tcm7-30498.pdf
Šporčić M, Martinić I, Landekić M, Lovrić M (2009) Measuring efficiency of organizational units in forestry by nonparametric model. Croat J For Eng 30:1–13
Stocks BJ, Goldammer JG, Kondrashov L (2008) Forest fires and fire management in the circum boreal zone: past trends and future uncertainties. International Model Forest Network Secretariat Natural Resources Canada–Canadian Forest Service. Discussion paper no. 1. http://www.imfn.net/?q=system/files/DiscussionPaper01(Fire).pdf
Šturm R, Fernandes PM (2012) The Canadian fire weather system and wildfire activity in the Karst forest management area, Slovenia. Eur J For Res 131:829–834
Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509
Tulkens H, Vanden Eeckaut P (1995) Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: methodological aspects. Eur J Oper Res 80:474–499
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997) Kyoto protocol, 1997. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2012
United Nations Millennium Declaration (2000) G.A. Res. 55/2, U.N. GAOR, 55th Sess., Supp. No. 49, at 4, U.N. Doc. A/55/49
Vahid S, Sowlati T (2007) Efficiency analysis of the Canadian wood-product manufacturing subsectors: a DEA approach. For Prod J 57:71–77
Vainio T (2001) Forest fire situation in Finland. Int UNECE/FAO Int For Fire News 24:17–22
Vanha-Majamaa I, Heikkilä T, Lindberg H (2004) Forest fire research in Finland. UNECE/FAO Int For Fire News 30:22–28
Vasconcelos MPP, Silva S, Tomé M, Alvim M, Pereira JMC (2001) Spatial prediction of fire ignition probabilities: comparing logistic regression and neural networks. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67:73–81
Vázquez A, Moreno JM (2001) Spatial distribution of forest fires in Sierra de Gredos (Central Spain). For Ecol Manag 147:55–65
Viitala EJ, Hänninen H (1998) Measuring the efficiency of non-profit forestry organizations. For Sci 44:298–307
Vilar del Hoyo L, Martín Isabel MP, Martínez Vega FJ (2011) Logistic regression models for human caused wildfire risk estimation: analyzing the effect of the spatial accuracy in the fire occurrence data. Eur J For Res 130:983–996
Yang J, He HS, Shifley SR, Gustafson EJ (2007) Spatial patterns of modern period human-caused fire occurrence in the Missouri Ozark Highlands. For Sci 53:1–15
Yin R (1998) DEA: a new methodology for evaluating the performance of forest products producers. For Prod J 48:29–34
Acknowledgments
Data were provided by the European Forest Fire Information System—EFFIS (http://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu) of the European Commission Joint Research Centre. The authors are also grateful to the two referees for their helpful and constructive remarks and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by C. Ammer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gutiérrez, E., Lozano, S. Avoidable damage assessment of forest fires in European countries: an efficient frontier approach. Eur J Forest Res 132, 9–21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0650-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0650-5