Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual dimorphism in reproductive and vegetative allometry for two dioecious Rhamnus plants in north-eastern China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dimorphism in reproductive allometry has received much attention, while rather little is known about the sexual dimorphism in the vegetative allometry of a dioecious species. This study presents vegetative and reproductive allometries for two dioecious tree species of the genus Rhamnus in north-eastern China. A power function and a linear model were found suitable for describing different components of the vegetative allometry. In addition, a linear regression was used to estimate the number of flowers and/or fruits based on observed stem size. R. davurica being the taller species of the two shows highly significant correlations for all selected combinations of different vegetative components. These correlations are much less pronounced and sometimes even nonsignificant in R. schneideri, which occupies a great variety of niches at the understory with diverse crown shapes. Component biomass was highly correlated with tree diameter for both sexes, but the allometries changed with sex and species. Both females and males show consistent patterns of reproductive size dependency. However, the slope of the linear relations differs between the sexes again indicating gender-related differences in reproductive size. According to theory, females allocate more biomass to reproduction than males, which negatively affects their vegetative growth. However, in this study, flowering females did not show less vegetative growth than males suggesting that the two Rhamnus species behave contrary to expectation. Further studies are required to test the assumption that photosynthesis by reproductive organs may substantially contribute to vegetative growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transact Res 6:397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen GA, Antos JA (1993) Sex-ratio variation in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. Am Nat 141:537–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bañuelos MJ, Obeso JR (2004) Resource allocation in the dioecious shrub Rhamnus alpinus: the hidden costs of reproduction. Evol Ecol Res 6:397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville GL (1972) Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can J For Res 49:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW (1979) Photosynthetic contribution of flowers and seeds to reproductive effort of an annual colonizer. New Phytol 82:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW, Harper JL (1979) Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits. Nature 279:554–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biscoe PV, Gallagher JN, Littleton EJ, Monteith JL, Scott RK (1975) Barley and its environment, IV. Contribution to yield. J Appl Ecol 12:295–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser SP, Aarssen LW (2003) Allometry and development in herbaceous plants: functional responses of meristem allocation to light and nutrient availability. Am J Bot 90:404–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsera SP, Aarssen LW (2009) Interpreting reproductive allometry: individual strategies of allocation explain size-dependent reproduction in plant populations. Perspect Plant Ecol Evolut Syst 11:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda-Cornejo V, Dirzo R (2010) Sex-related differences in reproductive allocation, growth, defense and herbivory in three dioecious neotropical palms. PLoS ONE 5:e9824. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini ML, Stiles EW (1991) Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica-sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and nutrient flux. Oecologia 86:585–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini ML, Whigham DF (1994) Sexual dimorphism and cost of reproduction in the dioecious shrub Lindera benzoin (Lauraceae). Am J Bot 81:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1997) Dioecy. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology. Oxford, Malden, pp 157–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF, Knapczyk FN, Taylor DR (2002) Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. J Evol Biol 15:1011–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia MB, Antor RJ (1995) Sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). Oecologia 101:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring JL, Linhart YB (1993) Sexual dimorphisms and response to low resources in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Int J Plant Sci 154:152–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich PD (2000) Arithmetic or geometric normality of biological variation: an empirical test of theory. J Theor Biol 204:201–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann AJ, Alliende MC (1984) Interactions in the patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in woody dioecious plants. Oecologia 61:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humeau L, Thompson JD (2001) The allometry of flower size dimorphism in dioecious Dombeya species on La Réunion. Ecol Lett 4:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh A, Nicotra AB (2003) Sexual dimorphism in reproductive allocation and water use efficiency in Maireana pyramidata (Chenopodiaceae), a dioecious, semi-arid shrub. Aust J Bot 51:509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Botl Rev 43:177–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L (1988) Modules of production and reproduction in a dioecious clonal shrub, Rhus typhina. Ecology 69:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marklund LG (1987) Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden. Report 43, 127 pp. Dept of Forest Survey, SLU, Umeå. ISSN 0348-0496

  • Matsuyama S, Sakimoto M (2008) Allocation to reproduction and relative reproductive costs in two Species of dioecious Anacardiaceae with contrasting phenology. Ann Bot 101:1391–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JR (2010) Allometric equations to predict the total aboveground biomass of radiata pine trees. Annu For Sci 67:806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra AB (1999) Reproductive allocation and the long-term costs of reproduction in Siparuna grandiflora, a dioecious neotropical shrub. J Ecol 87:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ (2003) An allometric model for seed plant reproduction. Evol Ecol Res 5:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeso JR (1997) Costs of reproduction in Ilex aquifolium: effects at tree, branch and leaf levels. J Ecol 85:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeso JR (2002) The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol 155:321–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard GC, Birchard GF, Boardman TJ (2011) Fitting statistical models in bivariate allometry. Biol Rev 86:549–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popp JW, Reinartz JA (1988) Sexual dimorphism in biomass allocation and clonal growth of Xanthoxylum americanum. Am J Bot 75:1732–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan A, EI-Keblawy A, Shaltout K, Lovett Doust J (1994) Sexual polymorphism, growth, and reproductive effort in Egyptian Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae). Am J Bot 81:847–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regina IS, Tarazona T, Calvo R (1997) Aboveground biomass in a beech forest and a Scots pine plantation in the Sierra de la Demanda area of northern Spain. Annu For Sci 54:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau AF, Houle G (2001) Different cost of reproduction for the males and females of the rare dioecious shrub Corema conradii (Empetraceae). Am J Bot 88:659–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovere AE, Aizen MA, Kitzberger T (2003) Growth and climatic response of male and female trees of Austrocedrus chilensis, a dioecious conifer from the temperate forests of southern south America. Ecoscience 10(2):195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai A, Burris T (1985) Growth in male and female aspen clones: a twenty-five-year longitudinal study. Ecology 66:1921–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel DG (1983) Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64:209–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SC (1996) Reproductive allometry in Malaysian rain forest trees: Biomechanics versus optimal allocation. Evol Ecol 10:517–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity, and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth C, Schulze ED, Kusznetova V, Milyukova I, Hardes G, Siry M, Schulze B, Vygodskaya NN (2002) Comparing the influence of site quality, stand age, fire and climate on aboveground tree production in Siberian Scots pine forests. Tree Physiol 22:537–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NO. HJ2010-19), the 12th five-year National Science and Technology plan of China (2012BAC01B03), the Program of the Co-Construction with Beijing Municipal Government of China (2011) and the Special Research Program for Forestry Welfare of China (20100400204).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuhai Zhao.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Matyssek.

Chunyu Zhang and Juan Wang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Wang, J., Zhao, X. et al. Sexual dimorphism in reproductive and vegetative allometry for two dioecious Rhamnus plants in north-eastern China. Eur J Forest Res 131, 1287–1296 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0598-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0598-5

Keywords

Navigation