Skip to main content
Log in

Competitiveness in the global forest industry sector: an empirical study with special emphasis on Germany

  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the presented study is to analyze the competitiveness of the German forest industry sector against the background of the international timber markets. The analysis is conducted based on global bilateral trade data in monetary terms. Timber commodities are grouped according to twelve commodity classes; each class is clearly attributed to one of the three processing levels raw wood, semi-finished and finished wood products. After an introductory description of the structure and development of the global timber market, two result-oriented competitiveness indicators have been applied: the revealed comparative advantage (RCA), which indicates whether a country is specialized in a specific sector—the RCA analysis has been conducted by means of the two consecutive indices Balassa index (BI) and Aquino index (AI)—and in addition the constant market share (CMS) analysis, which disaggregates the overall export growth of a country into four different effects: (1) the world growth effect, (2) the commodity-composition effect, (3) the market-distribution effect and (4) a residual, which usually is interpreted as the competitiveness effect. Depending on the chosen indicator, results are given for 21 and 25 leading countries (RCA and CMS, respectively). The highest BI values are shown by Russia for raw wood (10.4), by Finland for semi finished wood products (11.3) and by Poland for finished wood products (4.7). The AI shows that countries which are specialized in timber commodity exports mostly are significant timber importers, as well. This is an indication of their integration in an intra-industry trade. Germany only has a BI value somewhat greater than 1 for finished wood products. This can be seen as an indication of merely an average competitiveness position in global timber markets. The CMS analysis delivers two key results: most of the leading timber exporters in absolute terms show only low export growth rates and vice versa. Furthermore, a strong positive relationship can be identified between a country’s timber export growth rate and its competitiveness effect. Most of the Eastern European and many Asian and Latin American countries show this pattern, as they have high growth rates and high positive competitiveness effects. Germany’s export growth can be attributed much more to the overall world growth in timber markets than to its forest industry capacity. Hence, a stagnation of world growth would have crucial effects on the German forest industry sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a more precise survey of this regional classification see Ollmann (2003, p. 3)

References

  • Algieri B (2004) Trade specialisation patterns: the case of Russia. Bank of Finland BOFIT-Institute for Economies in Transition, Discussion Paper 2004 no. 19

  • Aquino A (1999) Aspetti Empirici Essenziale del Processo di Globalizatione. In: Acocella N Globalizzaione e Stato Sociale (ed) Il Mulino. Cited from: Algieri B (2004) Trade specialisation patterns: the case of Russia. Bank of Finland BOFIT-Institute for Economies in Transition, Discussion Paper 2004 no. 19

  • Balassa B (1962) Recent developments in the competitiveness of American industry and prospects for the future. In: Joint Economic Committee (ed) Factors affecting the United States balance of payments. U.S. Congress, Washington, pp 27–54

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 33:99–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1977) “Revealed” comparative advantage revisited: an analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953–1971. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 45:327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke IJ, Leitch J (1998) Trade restrictions and their impact on international trade in forest products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Duan Y (2000) Competitiveness of Canadian agri-food exports against competitors in Asia: 1980–97. J Int Food Agribus Market 11(4):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Xu L, Duan Y (2000) Ex-post competitiveness of China’s export in agri-food products: 1980–96. Agribusiness 16(3):281–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donges J, Riedel J (1977) The expansion of manufactured exports in developing countries: an empirical assessment of supply and demand issues. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 113(1):58–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries T, Hentschel C (1994) Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit - was ist das? Wirtschaftsdienst VIII, pp 416–422. HWWA-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Hamburg

  • Jepma C (1986) Extensions and application possibilities of the constant market shares analysis—the case of the developing countries’ exports. University Groningen, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunimoto K (1977) Typology of trade intensity indices. Hitotsubashi J Econ 17:15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K (1998) Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialisation. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics. DRUID Working Paper No. 98-30

  • Leamer E, Stern R (1970) Quantitative international economics. Allyn and Bacon Inc, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Milana C (1988) Constant-market-share analysis and index number theory. Eur J Polit Econ 4:453–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neven D (1995) Trade liberalization with Eastern Nations: how sensitive? In: Faini R, Portes R (eds) European Union Trade with eastern Europe: adjustment and opportunities, CEPR

  • Ohlin B (1933) Interregional and international trade. Havard University Press, Cambridge

  • Ollmann H (2003) Struktur des Weltholzhandels 1999 - Handelsströme. Working paper 2003/5 of the Institute for Economics of the Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products, Hamburg. http://www.bfafh.de/bibl/pdf/iii_03_05.pdf

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003) National accounts and economic statistics—international trade statistics. STD/NAES/TASS/ITS(2003)13; Paris

  • Richardson J (1971) Some sensitivity tests for a “constant-market-shares” analysis of export growth. Rev Econ Stat LIII(4):300–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1953) Prices of factors and goods in general equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 21:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath T (1991) A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127(2):265–280

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Analyzer (2004) 1985–2002. Statistics Canada, Ottawa

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful and substantial comments and also our colleague Frank Setzer for many brisk discussions about indices and their interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Dieter.

Additional information

Communicated by Martin Moog.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dieter, M., Englert, H. Competitiveness in the global forest industry sector: an empirical study with special emphasis on Germany. Eur J Forest Res 126, 401–412 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0159-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0159-x

Keywords

Navigation