Abstract
I will first review cross-cultural research in the area of culture and cognition, with particular focus on the development of spatial concepts. I propose that the formulation best covering all empirical data is in terms of «cognitive style», i.e., spatial cognitive processes are universally available to all humans, but there are preferences for some spatial frames of reference over others. These cultural differences are under the influence of a number of eco-cultural variables. The second part will illustrate this general conclusion by research on the development of the «geocentric» frame of spatial reference, initially studied by Levinson (Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003). This is a cognitive style in which individuals choose to describe and represent small-scale tabletop space in terms of large-scale geographic dimensions. In Indonesia, India, Nepal and Switzerland, we explore the development with age of geocentric language as well as geocentric cognition, and the relationships between the two, as well as the environmental and socio-cultural variables that favor the use of this frame (Dasen and Mishra, Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry JW, Dasen PR (eds) (1974) Culture and cognition: readings in cross-cultural psychology. Methuen, London
Berry JW, Dasen PR, Witkin HA (1982) Developmental theories in cross-cultural perspective. In: Adler LL (ed) Cross-cultural research at issue. Academic Press, New York, pp 13–22
Berry JW, Poortinga YH, Breugelmans SM, Chasiotis A, Sam SL (2011) Cross-cultural psychology: research and applications, 3rd revised edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cole M, Gay J, Glick JA, Sharp DW (1971) The cultural context of learning and thinking: an exploration in experimental anthropology. Basic Books, New York
Courrèges S (2011) L’espace et l’humain: les cadres de référence, leur développement et leurs relations avec les confusions spatiales (Space and human cognition: frames of reference, their development and relationships to spatial errors). Thèse de doctorat en psychologie. Université de Toulouse 2
Courrèges S, Troadec S (2009) Le développement des cadres de référence spatiale: l’émergence d’une préférence culturelle (The development of spatial frames of reference: the beginnings of a cultural preference). Bull Psychol 6:501–513. https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.504.0501
Dasen PR (1972) Cross-cultural Piagetian research: a summary. J Cross Cult Psychol 7:75–85
Dasen PR (2007) L’approche interculturelle du développement (Cross-cultural perspectives on human development). In: Lautrey J (ed) Psychologie du développement et de l’éducation (Developmental and educational psychology). PUF, Paris, pp 197–225
Dasen PR (2011) Culture, cognition and learning. In Nsamenang AB, Tchombe TMS (eds) Handbook of African educational theories and practices: a generative teacher education curriculum. Human Development Research Center (HDRC), Bamenda; Presses Universitaires d’Afrique, Yaoundé, pp 159–174. http://www.thehdrc.org/Handbook%20of%20African%20Educational%20Theories%20and%20Practices.pdf
Dasen PR (2017) The trouble of having a psychologist sharing field work. In: Von Poser AT, von Poser A (eds) Facets of fieldwork. Essays in honor of Jürg Wassmann. Universitätsverlag Winter, Heidelberg, pp 255–271
Dasen PR, Mishra RC (2010) Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dasen PR, Wassmann J (2008) A cross-cultural comparison of spatial language and encoding in Bali and Geneva. In: Pandey J, Srinivasa N (eds) Advances in cognitive science. Sage, New Delhi, pp 266–278
Dasen PR, Mishra RC, Wassmann J (2018) Quasi-experimental research in culture-sensitive psychology. Cult Psychol 24(3):327–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x18779043
Dörnyei Z (2005) The psychology of the language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Haun DBM, Rapold CJ, Janzen G, Levinson SC (2011) Plasticity of human spatial cognition: spatial language and cognition covary across cultures. Cognition 119:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.009
Kozhevnikov M (2007) Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychol Bull 133(3):464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
Levinson S (2003) Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Li P, Abarbanell L (2018) Competing perspectives on frames of reference in language and thought. Cognition 170:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.005
Messick S (1976) Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In: Messick S (ed) Individuality in learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 4–23
Mishra RC, Berry JW (2018) Ecology, culture and human development. Sage, New Delhi
Mishra RC, Dasen PR (2004) The influence of schooling on cognitive development: a review of research in India. In Setiadi BN, Supratiknya A, Lonner WJ, Poortinga YH (eds) Ongoing themes in psychology and culture. Selected papers from the sixteenth international congress of the international association for cross-cultural psychology. Kanisius, Yogyakarta, pp 207–222
Piaget J, Inhelder B (1956) The child’s conception of space. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (First published 1948 in French)
Ribordy F, Jabès A, Lavenex PB, Lavenex P (2013) Development of allocentric spatial memory abilities in children from 18 months to 5 years of age. Cogn Psychol 66:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.08.001
Rosati AG (2015) Context influences spatial frames of reference in bonobos (Pan panicus). Behaviour 152:375–406
Segall MH, Dasen PR, Berry JW, Poortinga YH (1999) Human behavior in global perspective: an introduction to cross-cultural psychology, 2nd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
Shore B (2012) Egocentric and allocentric perspective. In: Son R (ed) Cultural models. Grounding social sciences in cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 149–217
Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL (1997) Are cognitive styles still in style? Am Psychol 52:700–712
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. J Mem Lang 35:371–391
Troadec B (2007) Psychologie culturelle. Le développement cognitif est-il culturel? (Cultural psychology: is cognitive development cultural?). Belin, Paris
Vajpayee A, Dasen PR, Mishra RC (2008) Spatial encoding: a comparison of sanskrit- and hindi-medium schools. In: Pandey J, Srinivasa N (eds) Advances in cognitive science. Sage, New Delhi, pp 255–265
Wassmann J, Dasen PR (1998) Balinese spatial orientation: some empirical evidence for moderate linguistic relativity. J R Anthropol Inst inc Man (NS) 4:689–711
Wassmann J, Dasen PR (2006) How to orient yourself in Balinese space. Combining ethnographic and psychological methods for the study of cognitive processes. In: Straub J, Weidemann D, Kölb C, Zielke B (eds) Pursuit of meaning. Advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology. Transcript/Transaction Publishers, Bielefeld, pp 351–376
Witkin HA (1978) Cognitive style in personal and cultural adaptation. Clark University Press, Worcester
Witkin HA, Berry J (1975) Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. J Cross Cult Psychol 6:4–87
Witkin HA, Goodenough DR (1981) Cognitive styles: essence and origins. International Universities Press, New York
Witkin HA, Dyk RB, Faterson HF, Goodenough DR, Karp SA (1962) Psychological differentiation. Wiley, New York
Zhang L-F, Sternberg RJ (2006) The nature of intellectual styles. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. I thank J. Berry, R. C. Mishra and J. Wassmann for useful comments on a first draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dasen, P.R. Cross-cultural research on spatial concept development. Cogn Process 19 (Suppl 1), 93–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0882-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0882-5