Abstract
When guiding a remote collaborator in a virtual environment, people often take an addressee-perspective, which may have a high cognitive cost. In order to improve collaborative virtual environments, a better understanding of how operators share spatial information is needed. This work aimed to study the cognitive workload linked to spatial statements production in situations in which the relative positions of speaker, addressee and target were varied. Twenty-two participants were asked to give—in one go—instructions to a virtual collaborator on how to find a target in a 3D environment. The scene showed an avatar in the center of eight tables. Sixty-four configurations of avatar orientation (eight possibilities) and target location (on the eight tables) were tested. We measured the delay in starting the instruction once the target appeared, the instruction duration and the subjective evaluation of mental demand. Each instruction was classified according to the spatial reference frame used. The delay was influenced by the processing of spatial information in ego-centered and addressee-centered reference frames. All subsequent measures were determined by mental transformations in addressee-centered coordinates. One condition in particular, when the target was situated diagonally behind the addressee, gave rise to a higher mental demand for the speaker, which points to the investment made by the speaker in achieving the least collaborative effort. Further work should seek to develop efficient tools to facilitate spatial communication in situations that induce the most mental workload.
References
Bryant DJ, Tversky B (1999) Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25:137
Churchill EF, Snowdon D, Munro AJ (2001) Collaborative virtual environments. Springer, Berlin
Galati A, Avraamides MN (2015) Social and representational cues jointly influence spatial perspective-taking. Cogn Sci 39(4):739–765
Galati A, Michael C, Mello C, Greenauer NM, Avraamides MN (2013) The conversational partner’s perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions. J Mem Lang 68:140–159
Hart S, Staveland L (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. Advances in psychology, vol 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 139–183
McNamara TP (2003) How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In: Freksa C, Brauer W, Habel C, Wender KF (eds) Spatial cognition III. Springer, Berlin, pp 174–191
Pouliquen-Lardy L, Milleville-Pennel I, Guillaume F, Mars F (2014) How role distribution influences choice of spatial reference frames in a virtual collaborative task. Paper presented at Spatial Cognition 2014, Sep 2014, Bremen, Germany. Universität Bremen / Universität Freiburg, SFB/TR 8 Report, pp 106–108
Schober MF (1995) Speakers, addressees, and frames of reference: whose effort is minimized in conversations about locations? Discourse Process 20:219–247
Acknowledgments
This study is part of the PIVIPP project managed by IRT Jules Verne (French Institute in Research and Technology in Advanced Manufacturing Technologies for Composite, Metallic and Hybrid Structures). The authors wish to associate the industrial and academic partners of this project, respectively Airbus Group, Airbus and IRCCyN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pouliquen-Lardy, L., Mars, F., Guillaume, F. et al. Virtual collaboration: effect of spatial configuration on spatial statements production. Cogn Process 16 (Suppl 1), 337–342 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0672-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0672-2