Skip to main content
Log in

Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural–verbal description

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research explored pseudoneglect for the mental representation of real-world scenes generated from aural–verbal description in the complete absence of direct visual processing. Healthy participants listened binaurally or monaurally to aural–verbal descriptions of novel real-world scenes with familiar landmarks (e.g. ‘shop’, ‘cafe’, ‘school’) to be imagined on the left- or right-hand side. Participants were asked to mentally represent the street scene using a visuospatial template though it was up to participants how they mentally represented each individual landmark within the street (i.e. in terms of colour and size). There were two main tasks: a relative judgement task (which side of the street contains the most landmarks?) and a recall task (recall the landmarks on the left vs. right side of the street). When stimuli were presented monaurally to the left ear (favouring the activation of the right hemisphere) participants demonstrated representational pseudoneglect and showed a bias towards responding that there were more landmarks on the left compared to the right. However, this did not lead to enhanced recall for left side landmarks. When stimuli were presented binaurally or monaurally to the right ear, there was no evidence of representational pseudoneglect for the relative judgement or recall task. The current study discusses how the use of monaural presentation may boost right hemisphere activation in aural–verbal experimental paradigms designed to explore representational pseudoneglect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Barnett-Cowan M, Jenkin H, Dyde R, Jenkin M, Harris L (2013) Asymmetrical representation of body orientation. J Vis 13(2):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisiach E, Luzatti C (1978) Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14:129–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourlon C, Duret C, Pradat-Diehl P, Azouvi P, Loeper-Jény C, Merat-Blanchard M, Levy C, Bartolomeo P (2011) Vocal response times to real and imagined stimuli in spatial neglect: a group study and single case report. Cortex 47(5):536–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980) Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18(4–5):491–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks JL, Logie RH, McIntosh RD, Sala SD (2011) Representational pseudoneglect for an auditory-driven spatial working memory task. Q J Exp Psychol 64(11):2168–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyné TT, Taylor HA (2008) Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. J Mem Lang 58:701–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bultitude JH, Davies AMA (2006) Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 44(10):1849–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling S, Logie RH, Della Sala S (2012) Representational pseudoneglect in line bisection. Psychon Bull Rev 19(5):879–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Sala S, Logie RH, Beschin N, Denis M (2004) Preserved visuo-spatial transformations in representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 42(10):1358–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Della Sala S, Darling S, Logie RH (2010) Items on the left are better remembered. Q J Exp Psychol 63(5):848–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyzac E, Logie RH, Denis M (2006) Visuospatial working memory and the processing of spatial descriptions. Br J Psychol 97:217–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink GR, Marshall JC, Shah NJ, Weiss PH, Halligan PW, Grosse-Ruyken M et al (2000a) Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 54(6):1324–1331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Shah NJ, Toni I, Halligan PW et al (2000b) ‘Where’ depends on ‘what’: a differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one-versus two-dimensions. Neuropsychologia 38(13):1741–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Zilles K (2001) The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage 14(1):S59–S67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman A, Mohr C, Brugger P (2012) Representational pseudoneglect and reference points both influence geographical location estimates. Psychon Bull Rev 19(2):277–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T (1979) Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation. Neuropsychologia 17(3–4):315–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38(1):93–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsbourne M (1970) Cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol 33:193–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logie RH, Della Sala S, Beschin N, Dennis M (2005) Dissociating mental transformations and visuo-spatial storage in working memory: evidence from representational neglect. Memory 13(3–4):430–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGeorge P, Beschin N, Colnaghi A, Rusconi ML, Della Sala S (2007) A lateralized bias in mental imagery: evidence for representational pseudoneglect. Neurosci Lett 421(3):259–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls M, McIlroy AM (2010) Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections. Exp Psychol 57(4):315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1970) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiement P, Champoux F, Bacon BA, Lassonde M, Gagné JP, Mensour B et al (2008) Functional reorganization of the human auditory pathways following hemispherectomy: an fMRI demonstration. Neuropsychologia 46(12):2936–2942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter Lorenz PA, Kinsbourne M, Moscovitch M (1990) Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain Cogn 12:240–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roman A, Fathi E, Santiago J (2013) Spatial biases in understanding descriptions of static scenes: the role of reading and writing direction. Mem Cogn 41(4):588–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönwiesner M, Krumbholz K, Rübsamen R, Fink GR, Yves von Cramon D (2007) Hemispheric asymmetry for auditory processing in the human auditory brain stem, thalamus, and cortex. Cereb Cortex 17(2):492–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toba M-N, Cavanagh P, Bartolomeo P (2011) Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines. Neuropsychologia 49(2):238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanski M, Bartolomeo P (2008) Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right. Cortex 44(7):782–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varnava A, Halligan PW (2009) Line bisection: does introspection inform cognitive strategy? Neuropsychologia 47(1):280–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Ph.D. studentship from The Universita’ Suor Orsola Benincasa awarded to JB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna L. Brooks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, J.L., Brandimonte, M.A. Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural–verbal description. Cogn Process 15, 201–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0591-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0591-z

Keywords

Navigation