Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the categorical nature of emotion word recognition. Positive, negative, and neutral words were presented in lexical decision tasks. Word frequency was additionally manipulated. In Experiment 1, “positive” and “negative” categories of words were implicitly indicated by the blocked design employed. A significant emotion–frequency interaction was obtained, replicating past research. While positive words consistently elicited faster responses than neutral words, only low frequency negative words demonstrated a similar advantage. In Experiments 2a and 2b, explicit categories (“positive,” “negative,” and “household” items) were specified to participants. Positive words again elicited faster responses than did neutral words. Responses to negative words, however, were no different than those to neutral words, regardless of their frequency. The overall pattern of effects indicates that positive words are always facilitated, frequency plays a greater role in the recognition of negative words, and a “negative” category represents a somewhat disparate set of emotions. These results support the notion that emotion word processing may be moderated by distinct systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, Loftis B, Neely JH, Nelson DL, Simpson GB, Treiman R (2007) The English Lexicon Project. Behav Res Methods 39(3):445–459

  • Barsalou LW (1983) Ad hoc categories. Mem Cogn 11(3):211–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzanella B, Bouquet P (2011) Associative and categorical priming in recognition of individuals. In: Carlson L, Hölscher C, Shipley TF (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, pp 525–530

  • Becker CA (1979) Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5(2):252–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker CA (1980) Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies. Mem Cogn 8(6):493–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bermeitinger C, Wentura D, Frings C (2011) How to switch on and switch off semantic priming effects for natural and artifactual categories: activation processes in category memory depend on focusing specific feature dimensions. Psychon Bull Rev 18(3):579–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borowsky R, Besner D (2006) Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? Psychol Rev 113(1):181–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1999) Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL

  • Briesemeister BB, Kuchinke L, Jacobs AM (2011a) Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23743

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briesemeister BB, Kuchinke L, Jacobs AM (2011b) Discrete Emotion Norms for Nouns: Berlin Affective Word List (DENN-BAWL). Behav Res Methods 43(2):441–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P, Friesen WV (1971) Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 17(2):124–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes Z, Adelman JS (2008a) Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). Emotion 8(4):441–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes Z, Adelman JS (2008b) Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion 8(4):453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine JRJ, Scherer KR, Roesch EB, Ellsworth PC (2007) The world of emotion is not two-dimensional. Psychol Sci 18(12):1050–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hand CJ, Miellet S, O’Donnell PJ, Sereno SC (2010) The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you’re coming from. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36(5):1294–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermüller F, Marslen-Wilson WD (2006) The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage 30(4):1383–1400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kousta S-T, Vinson DP, Vigliocco G (2009) Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition 112(3):473–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinke L, Võ ML, Hofmann M, Jacobs AM (2007) Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. Int J Psychophysiol 65(2):132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen RJ, Mercer KA, Balota DA, Strube MJ (2008) Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: importance of word arousal. Emotion 8(4):445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner JS, Keltner D (2000) Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cogn Emot 14(4):473–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnies E (1949) Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychol Rev 56(5):244–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-Bértolo C, Pozo JA, Hinojosa JA (2011) Word frequency modulates the processing of emotional words: convergent behavioral and electrophysiological data. Neurosci Lett 494(3):250–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakic M, Smith BW, Busis S, Vythilingam M, Blair RJR (2006) The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: the role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage 31(4):1752–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto F, John OP (1991) Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. J Pers Soc Psychol 61(3):380–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(6):1161–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs O, Weis S, Zellagui N, Huber W, Zvyaginstev M, Mathiak K, Kircher T (2008) Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neuronal activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories. Brain Res 1218:194–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter DL, Badgaiyan RD (2001) Neuroimaging of priming: new perspectives on implicit and explicit memory. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott GG, O’Donnell PJ, Leuthold H, Sereno SC (2009) Early emotion word processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 80(1):95–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott GG, O’Donnell PJ, Sereno SC (2012) Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38(3):783–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segalowitz SJ, Zheng X (2009) An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access. Biol Psychol 80(1):122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sereno SC, Rayner K (2003) Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends Cogn Sci 7(11):489–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RA, Mikels JA, James TW (2007) Characterization of the Affective Norms for English Words by discrete emotional categories. Behav Res Methods 39(4):1020–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SE (1991) Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychol Bull 110(1):67–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unkelbach C, Fiedler K, Bayer M, Stegmüller M, Danner D (2008) Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 95(1):36–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wurm LH (2007) Danger and usefulness: an alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception? Psychon Bull Rev 14(6):1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK

    Graham G. Scott

  2. Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 8QB, UK

    Patrick J. O’Donnell & Sara C. Sereno

Authors
  1. Graham G. Scott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick J. O’Donnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara C. Sereno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara C. Sereno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, G.G., O’Donnell, P.J. & Sereno, S.C. Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision. Cogn Process 15, 209–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0589-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0589-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation