Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast sets in spatial and temporal language

  • Extended Abstract
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Coventry KR, Garrod SC (2004) Saying, seeing and acting: the psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Essays in Cognitive Psychology series, Psychology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Freksa C (1999) Links vor—Prototyp oder Gebiet? Probabilistische und possibilistische Raumbeschreibung. In: Rickheit G (Hg) Richtungen im Raum. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 231–246

  • Freksa C, Barkowsky T (1996) On the relation between spatial concepts and geographic objects. In: Burrough P, Frank A (eds) Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn Sci 7(2):55–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J (eds) Syntax and semantics. Academic Press, New York, vol 3, pp 41–58

  • Halliday MAK (1985) An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn, 1994. Edward Arnold, London

  • Heinämäki O (1974) Semantics of English temporal connectives. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin

  • Herskovits A (1986) Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Martin JR, Rose D (2003) Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd, London

  • Randell DA, Cui Z, Cohn A (1992) A spatial logic based on regions and connection. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 165–176

  • Rooth M (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Nat Lang Semant 1:75–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrink T (2007) Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemo F (1999) The pragmatics of signs, the semantics of relevance, and the semantic/pragmatic interface. In Turner K (ed) The semantics-pragmatics interface from different points of view. CRiSPI Series, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 343–417

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thora Tenbrink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tenbrink, T., Freksa, C. Contrast sets in spatial and temporal language. Cogn Process 10 (Suppl 2), 322–324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0309-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0309-4

Keywords

Navigation