Skip to main content
Log in

System Maps for Retention of Small Neutral Compounds on a Superficially Porous Ethyl-Bridged, Octadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an ethyl-bridged, ocatadecylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phase (Kinetex EVO C18) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not methanol–water mobile phase compositions. Compared with a superficially porous octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) with a similar morphology but different topology statistically significant differences in selectivity at the 95% confidence level are observed for neutral compounds that vary by size and hydrogen-bond basicity with other intermolecular interactions roughly similar. These selectivity differences are dampened with acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but are significant for methanol–water mobile phase compositions containing <30% (v/v) methanol. A comparison of a totally porous ethyl-bridged, octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (XBridge C18) with Kinetex EVO C18 indicated that they are effectively selectivity equivalent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fanali S, Haddad PR, Poole CF, Riekkola M-L (eds) (2017) Liquid chromatography: fundamentals and instrumentation, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW (2009) Introduction to modern liquid chromatography, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkland JJ (2004) Development of some stationary phases for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1060:9–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies NH, Euerby MR, McCalley DV (2008) Analysis of basic compounds by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using hybrid inorganic/organic phases at high pH. J Chromatogr A 1178:71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCalley DV (2010) The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations. J Chromatogr A 1217:858–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyndham KD, O’Gara JE, Walter TH, Glose KH, Lawrence NL, Alden BA, Izzo GS, Hudalla CJ, Irenata PC (2003) Characterization and evaluation of C18HPLC stationary phase based on ethyl-bridged hybrid organic/inorganic particles. Anal Chem 74:6781–6788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Gara JE, Wyndham KD (2006) Porous hybrid organic-inorganic particles in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 29:1025–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu H, Jia CY, Wu HB, Song GJ, Jin Y, Ke HX, Liang XM (2012) Highly stable high performance liquid chromatography stationary phases based on direct chemical modification of organic bridges in hybrid silica. J Chromatogr A 1247:63–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Imran A, Al-Othman ZA, Nagae N, Gaitonde VD, Dutta KK (2012) Recent trends in ultra-fast HPLC. New generation superficially porous silica columns. J Sep Sci 35:3235–3249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Atapattu SN, Poole CF, Praseuth MB (2016) System maps for retention of small neutral compounds on a superficially porous particle column in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1468:250–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiridena W, Poole CF, Atapattu SN, Qian J, Koziol WW (2007) Comparison of the separation characteristics of the organic-inorganic hybrid octadecyl stationary phases XTerra MS C18 and XBridge C18 and Shield RP18 in RPLC. Chromatographia 66:453–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buntz S, Figus M, Liu Z, Kazakevich YV (2012) Excess adsorption of binary aqueous organic mixtures on various reversed-phase packing materials. J Chromatogr A 1240:104–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Poole CF (2015) An interphase model for retention in liquid chromatography. J Planar Chromatogr 28:98–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Poole CF, Lenca N (2017) Applications of the solvation parameter model in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1486:2–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poole CF, Poole SK (2002) Column selectivity from the perspective of the solvation parameter model. J Chromatogr A 965:263–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abraham MH, Ibrahim A, Zissmos AM (2004) Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements. J Chromatogr A 1037:29–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poole CF, Atapattu SN, Poole SK, Bell AN (2009) Determination of solute descriptors by chromatographic methods. Anal Chim Acta 652:32–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Poole CF, Ariyasena TC, Lenca N (2013) Estimation of the environmental properties of compounds from chromatographic measurements and the solvation parameter model. J Chromatogr A 1317:85–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poole CF, Poole SK (2009) Foundations of retention in partition chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1216:1530–1550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poole CF, Ahmed H, Kiridena W, DeKay C, Koziol WW (2005) Contribution of steric repulsion to retention on an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 62:553–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carr PW, Dolan JW, Neue UD, Snyder LR (2011) Contributions to reversed-phase column selectivity. 1. Steric interaction. J Chromatogr A 1218:1724–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald PD (2003) Improving our understanding of the reversed-phase separations for the 21st century. Adv Chromatogr 42:323–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Antonia Napoli (Phenomenex) is acknowledged for providing the columns used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin F. Poole.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors Atapattu and Poole have no conflict of interest. Author Praseuth is an employee of Phenomenex who manufactured the column used in this study. Authors Atapattu and Poole received no financial support from Phenomenex for this study.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atapattu, S.N., Poole, C.F. & Praseuth, M.B. System Maps for Retention of Small Neutral Compounds on a Superficially Porous Ethyl-Bridged, Octadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography. Chromatographia 80, 1279–1286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3350-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3350-y

Keywords

Navigation