Skip to main content
Log in

Predation in bird populations

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the classic ecological questions is how predators affect population size. This is often assessed by measuring how many individuals are killed by a predator, yet such direct effects may only be a relatively minor part of population dynamics. Predators frequently affect prey populations indirectly, with the fear of predation resulting in costly behavioural compensation that has the potential to lead to large population and community effects. Large observable lethal effects may then just represent the most easily observed “special” cases of the effects of predation on populations, with the costs of non-lethal effects being ubiquitous and usually dominant. This review explores these two ideas: that both cases where there are no population effects due to predation and those where lethal effects dominate are unusual and involve special circumstances. First, systems in which predation effects appear not to arise include (1) complete avoidance of predators by prey; (2) when other environmental factors limit populations so that predation is not additive to mortality; (3) when there are other more vulnerable prey for a predator; (4) when predators interact; (5) because the relationship of perceived predation risk with predator abundance is usually a non-linear function; (6) for the simple reason that non-lethal effects have not been considered. Second, lethal effects tend to dominate over non-lethal effects when (1) there is a high cost of compensating for predation risk associated with either a resource constraint or a particularly vulnerable niche or life-history stage (e.g. the nest stage generally for birds); (2) prey are the most popular prey of a predator or linear trophic chains operate; (3) there is evolutionary lag, such as introduced predators and naïve prey populations; (4) there are several predator species hunting the same prey in diverse ways. The presence of predators may or may not affect the size of a bird population at any particular life-history stage, although in most cases it will do so through non-lethal effects and, occasionally, through lethal effects. However, the presence of predators will always affect intra- and interspecific competition and so will always affect population dynamics. Studies that wish to fully demonstrate that predation has no effect on bird populations must show that lethal effects and the costs of non-lethal compensation by the prey do not significantly change its density and, consequently, the level of competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1984) Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. Am Nat 124:80–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1991) Strengths of indirect effects generated by optimal foraging. Oikos 62:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1993) Why predation rate should not be proportional to predator density. Ecology 74:726–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321–326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amar A, Redpath S, Sim I, Buchanan G (2010) Spatial and temporal associations between recovering populations of common raven Corvus corax and British upland wader populations. J Appl Ecol 47:253–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman J, Alerstam T (2001) Confronting the winds: orientation and flight behaviour of roosting swifts, Apus apus. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1081–1087

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balaz M, Weidinger K, Kocian L, Nemethova D (2007) Effect of habitat on blackcap, Sylvia atricapilla nest predation in the absence of corvid predators. Folia Zool 56:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett PM, Owens IPF (2002) Evolutionary ecology of birds: life histories, mating systems and extinction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Daniel JC (2005) The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1663–1668

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolker B, Holyoak M, Krivan V, Rowe L, Schmitz O (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101–1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Preisser EL (2005) Resource competition modifies the strength of trait-mediated predator-prey interactions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 86:2771–2779

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton M, Tyler G, Smith K, Bamford R (2007) The impact of predator control on lapwing Vanellus vanellus breeding success on wet grassland nature reserves. J Appl Ecol 44:534–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne WRP (1960) A hunting partnership between two birds of prey. Ibis 102:136

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS, Sinclair ARE, White GC (1999) Seasonal compensation of predation and harvesting. Oikos 87:419–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Kotler BP (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler SJ, Whittingham MJ, Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2005) Quantifying the interaction between food density and habitat structure in determining patch selection. Anim Behav 69:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5:302–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Christianson D (2008) Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:194–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1993) Escape responses by redshanks, Tringa totanus, on attack by avian predators. Anim Behav 46:609–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1994) Age-dependent choice of redshank (Tringa totanus) feeding location: profitability or risk? J Anim Ecol 63:589–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1995) Selection of avian prey by wintering sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in southern Scotland. Ardea 83:381–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1996) Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and Merlins F. columbarius. Ibis 138:684–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (2008) Non-lethal effects of predation risk in birds. Ibis 150:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Whitfield DP (1994) The effects of raptor predation on wintering wader populations at the Tyninghame estuary, southeast Scotland. Ibis 136:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Whitfield DP (2008) How starvation risk in Redshanks results in predation mortality from Sparrowhawks. Ibis 150:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Holt S, Reid JM, Whitfield DP, Mellanby RJ, Norton DW, Waldron S (2004) The energetic costs of egg heating constrain incubation attendance but do not determine daily energy expenditure in the pectoral sandpiper. Behav Ecol 15:498–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Lind J, Quinn JL (2010) Predator hunting success and prey vulnerability: quantifying the spatial scale over which lethal and non-lethal effects of predation occur. J Anim Ecol 79:556–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Soule ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker D (1998) Over-ocean flocking by Dunlins, Calidris alpina, and the effect of raptor predation at Boundary Bay, British Columbia. Can Field Nat 112:694–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1989) The present, past and future of human-caused extinctions. Philos Trans R Soc B 325:469–477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A, Power DM (1990) Survival rates and their relationship to life-history traits in some common British birds. Curr Ornithol 7:115–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnet GM, Ollason JC (1978) The estimation of survival rate in the fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis. J Anim Ecol 47:507–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Duriez O, Fritz H, Binet F, Tremblay Y, Ferrand Y (2005) Individual activity rates in wintering Eurasian woodcocks: starvation versus predation risk trade-off? Anim Behav 69:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington PL (1943) An analysis of mink predation upon muskrats in north-central United States. Iowa Agric Res Bull 320:798–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington PL (1945) Some contributions of a fifteen-year study of the northern bobwhite to a knowledge of population phenomena. Ecol Monog 15:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL (2004) The potential for interactions between predation and habitat change to cause population declines of farmland birds. Ibis 146:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Facon B, Genton BJ, Shykoff J, Jarne P, Estoup A, David P (2006) A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:130–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher K, Aebischer NJ, Baines D, Foster R, Hoodless AN (2010) Changes in breeding success and abundance of ground-nesting moorland birds in relation to the experimental deployment of legal predator control. J Appl Ecol 47:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine JJ, Martel M, Markland HA, Niklison AA, Decker KL, Martin TE (2007) Testing ecological and behavioral correlates of nest predation. Oikos 116:1887–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosler AG (1996) Environmental and social determinants of winter fat storage in the great tit Parus major. J Anim Ecol 65:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Götmark F, Post P (1996) Prey selection by Sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus - relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behavior. Philos Trans R Soc B 351:1559–1577

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand TC (2002) Alternative forms of competition and predation dramatically affect habitat selection under foraging-predation-risk trade-offs. Behav Ecol 13:280–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Tyler GA, Stowe TJ, Newton AV (1997) A simulation model of the effect of mowing of agricultural grassland on the breeding success of the corncrake (Crex crex). J Zool 243:81–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagelin JC (2003) A field study of ornaments, body size, and mating behavior of the Gambel’s Quail. Wilson Bull 115:246–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen SA, Engebretsen H, Erikstad KE (2002) Incubation start and egg size in relation to body reserves in the common eider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:282–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Wirsing AJ, Burkholder D, Thomson J, Dill LM (2009) Towards a predictive framework for predator risk effects: the interaction of landscape features and prey escape tactics. J Anim Ecol 78:556–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RH, Davies ZG, Staddon S (2008) Meta-analysis of the effects of predation on animal prey abundance: evidence from UK vertebrates. PLoS ONE 3(6):e2400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002400

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, McNamara JM, Hutchinson JMC (1993) General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philos Trans R Soc B 341:375–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Igual JM, Forero MG, Gomez T, Oro D (2007) Can an introduced predator trigger an evolutionary trap in a colonial seabird? Biol Conserv 137:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger R, Bearhop S, Robinson JA, Ruxton G (2006) Prey choice affects the trade-off balance between predation and starvation in an avian herbivore. Anim Behav 71:1335–1341

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger R, Gudmundsson GA, Ruxton GD, Newton J, Colhoun K, Auhage S, Bearhop S (2008) Habitat utilisation during staging affects body condition in a long distance migrant, Branta bernicla hrota: potential impacts on fitness? J Avian Biol 39:704–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes J, Kelly D, Overton JM, Gillies C (2010) Predation and other factors currently limiting New Zealand forest birds. NZ J Ecol 34:86–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins D, Watson A, Miller GR (1964) Predation and red grouse populations. J Appl Ecol 1:183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Blaustein L (1995) Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment—when are the risky and safe patches of equal value. Oikos 74:251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Blaustein L, Brown JS (1992) Predator facilitation—the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Ann Zool Fenn 29:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Boonstra R, Sinclair ARE, Smith JNM, Dale MRT, Martin K, Turkington R (1995) Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269:1112–1115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krivan V, Schmitz OJ (2004) Trait and density mediated indirect interactions in simple food webs. Oikos 107:239–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1956) Swifts in a tower. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lank DB, Butler RW, Ireland J, Ydenberg RC (2003) Effects of predation danger on migration strategies of sandpipers. Oikos 103:303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T, Sordahl TA, Byrkjedal I (1996) Factors related to aggressive nest protection behaviour: a comparative study of Holarctic waders. Biol J Linn Soc 58:409–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte VJ, Sorci G, Cornet S, Jaeger A, Faivre B, Arnoux E, Gaillard M, Trouve C, Besson D, Chastel O, Weimerskirch H (2010) Patterns of aging in the long-lived wandering albatross. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6370–6375

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold M (1991) Trophic interactions and habitat segregation between competing Daphnia species. Oecologia 86:510–520

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Krebs JR, Davies NB (1991). The evolution of life histories. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 137–168

  • Letnic M, Koch F, Gordon C, Crowther MS, Dickman CR (2009) Keystone effects of an alien top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3249–3256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1986) Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions: determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology 67:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1993) Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on escape from predatory attack—a survey of North-American birds. Wilson Bull 105:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions—what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience 48:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2009) Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev 84:485–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Mitchell WA, Roth TC (2003) Predators feeding on behaviourally responsive prey: some implications for classical models of optimal diet choice. Evol Ecol Res 5:1083–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle S, Pellis SM, Wilson WF (2005) Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns early in life. J Anim Ecol 74:1140–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttbeg B, Kerby JL (2005) Are scared prey as good as dead? Trends Ecol Evol 20:416–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luttbeg B, Rowe L, Mangel M (2003) Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects. Ecology 84:1140–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod R, Barnett P, Clark JA, Cresswell W (2005) Body mass change strategies in blackbirds Turdus merula: the starvation-predation risk trade-off. J Anim Ecol 74:292–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod R, Clark J, Cresswell W (2008) The starvation-predation risk trade-off, body mass and population status in the Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 150:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE (1991) Food limitation in terrestrial breeding bird populations: is that all there is? Proc 20th Int Ornithol Congr 20:1595–1602

  • McGowan A, Cresswell W, Ruxton GD (2002) The effects of daily weather variation on foraging and responsiveness to disturbance in overwintering Red Knot (Calidris canutus). Ardea 90:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI (1987) Starvation and predation as factors limiting population size. Ecology 68:1515–1519

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI, Lima SL (1994) Foraging routines of small birds in winter: a theoretical investigation. J Avian Biol 25:287–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Heller R (1978) The influence of a predator on optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson SE, Rexstad EA, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Aebischer NJ (2010) Population change of avian predators and grey squirrels in England: is there evidence for an impact on avian prey populations? J Appl Ecol 47:244–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1986) The Sparrowhawk. Poyser, Calton

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1993) Predation and limitation of bird numbers. Curr Ornithol 11:143–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Paclik M, Misik J, Weidinger K (2009) Nest predation and nest defence in European and North American woodpeckers: a review. Ann Zool Fenn 46:361–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Page G, Whitacre DF (1975) Raptor predation on wintering shorebirds. Condor 77:73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Barton NH (1993) Optimality, mutation and the evolution of aging. Nature 362:305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Harvey PH (1988) The ecological context of life history evolution. Science 24:1449–1455

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR (1998) Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators. Oecologia 113:565–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Abrams PA, Bolnick DI, Dill LM, Grabowski JH, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Preisser EL, Schmitz OJ, Trussell GC (2008) Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions. Ecology 89:2416–2425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Tris J, de la Puente J, Pinilla J, Bermejo A (2001) Body moult and autumn migration in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica: is there a cost of moulting late? Ann Zool Fenn 38:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrins CM, Geer TA (1980) The effect of sparrowhawks on tit populations. Ardea 68:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy D (1990) Why fly? The possible benefits for lower mortality. Biol J Linn Soc 40:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Pravosudov VV, Grubb TC, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED, Thompson CF (1997) Energy management in passerine birds during the nonbreeding season. Curr Ornithol 14:189–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Grabowski JH (2009) Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey. Ecol Lett 12:315–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puigcerver M, Gallego S, Rodriguezteijeiro ID, Senar JC (1992) Survival and mean life span of the quail Coturnic c. coturnix. Bird Study 39:120–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath SM (1991) The impact of hen harriers on red grouse breeding success. J Appl Ecol 28:659–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath SM, Thirgood SJ, Leckie F (2001) Does supplementary feeding reduce predation of red grouse by hen harriers? J Appl Ecol 38:1157–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie EG, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 12:982–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth TC, Lima SL, Vetter WE (2006) Determinants of predation risk in small wintering birds: the hawk’s perspective. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo P, Korpimaki E, Banks PB, Nordstrom M, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1237–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Wellenburg CA, Visser GH, Biebach B, Delhey K, Oltrogge M, Wittenzellner A, Biebach H, Kempenaers B (2008) Trade-off between migration and reproduction: does a high workload affect body condition and reproductive state? Behav Ecol 19:1351–1360

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Selas V (1993) Selection of prey by breeding Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in southern Norway: the importance of size and foraging behaviour of prey. Ornis Fenn 70:144–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Hiraldo F (2008) Intraguild predation in raptor assemblages: a review. Ibis 150:132–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1980) Optimal behaviour: can foragers balance two conflicting demands. Science 210:1041–1043

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63:786–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Prey refuges and predator-prey stability. Theor Popul Biol 31:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Christensen B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Anim Behav 61:379–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Pintor LM, Preisser E, Rehage JS, Vonesh JR (2010) Predator-prey naivete, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119:610–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RK, Pullin AS, Stewart GB, Sutherland WJ (2010) Effectiveness of predator removal for enhancing bird populations. Conserv Biol 24:820–829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman DW (1995) Prehistoric extinction of Pacific island birds—biodiversity meets zooarchaeology. Science 267:1123–1131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stillman RA, Goss-Custard JD (2002) Seasonal changes in the response of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus to human disturbance. J Avian Biol 33:358–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharme AP, Green RE, Baines D, Bainbridge IP, O’Brien M (2001) The effect of management for red grouse shooting on the population density of breeding birds on heather-dominated moorland. J Appl Ecol 38:439–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen L (1946) Sperver als Roofvijand zan Zangvogels. Ardea 34:1–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornberg R (1997) Prey selection of the goshawk Accipiter gentilis during the breeding season: the role of prey profitability and vulnerability. Ornis Fenn 74:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 9:1245–1252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tschanz B, Bersier LF, Bacher S (2007) Functional responses: a question of alternative prey and predator density. Ecology 88:1300–1308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Veen IT (2000) Daily routines and predator encounters in Yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella in the field during winter. Ibis 142:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Videler JJ (2005) Avian flight. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson M, Aebischer NJ, Cresswell W (2007) Vigilance and fitness in grey partridges Perdix perdix: the effects of group size and foraging-vigilance trade-offs on predation mortality. J Anim Ecol 76:211–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham MJ, Evans KL (2004) The effects of habitat structure on predation risk in birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 146[Suppl 2]:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirsing AJ, Cameron KE, Heithaus MR (2010) Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode. Anim Behav 79:531–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasue M, Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2003) Multiple effects of weather on the starvation and predation risk trade-off in choice of feeding location in redshanks. Funct Ecol 17:727–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Butler RW, Lank DB, Smith BD, Ireland J (2004) Western sandpipers have altered migration tactics as peregrine falcon populations have recovered. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1263–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanette L, Smith JNM, van Oort H, Clinchy M (2003) Synergistic effects of food and predators on annual reproductive success in song sparrows. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:799–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanette L, Clinchy M, Smith JNM (2006) Combined food and predator effects on songbird nest survival and annual reproductive success: results from a bi-factorial experiment. Oecologia 147:632–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Franz Barlein for inviting me to take part in the symposium to celebrate the 100th anniversary of IFV. I thank Ian Newton, Peter Becker and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Will Cresswell.

Additional information

Communicated by P. H. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cresswell, W. Predation in bird populations. J Ornithol 152 (Suppl 1), 251–263 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1

Keywords

Navigation