Skip to main content
Log in

Responses to increased costs of activity during incubation in a songbird with female-only incubation: does feather colour signal coping ability?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals differ in their ability to cope with energetically demanding situations while caring for the current brood, and they can signal this ability by their colouration. We examined the impact of handicapping (clipping of wing and tail feathers) on an energetically demanding care behaviour (incubation) in female Great Tits (Parus major). We hypothesised that the intensity of carotenoid-based breast feather colouration signals the ability to cope with impaired flight ability and the consequent increased energetic demands. If this is the case, females with more intensely coloured feathers should cope better with the handicap compared with less intensely coloured females, i.e. the impact of handicapping on mass loss and nest attentiveness should be negatively correlated with colouration. Handicapped females lost more weight than control females but did not decrease nest attentiveness to a greater extent, suggesting that females take the costs of handicapping on themselves. Females in poor condition were more severely influenced by handicapping. Intensity of female breast feather colouration did not correlate with either change in nest attentiveness or body mass loss during incubation. Intensity of breast feather colouration therefore does not appear to signal female ability to cope with this energetically demanding situation during incubation.

Zusammenfassung

Reaktionen auf erhöhte Kosten bei der Bebrütung von Singvögeln mit Inkubation ausschließlich durch das Weibchen: Ist die Gefiederfarbe ein Anzeichen für bessere Stressbewältigung? Individuen unterscheiden sich in ihrer Fähigkeit mit energetisch ungünstigen Situationen während der Brutpflege umzugehen und sie zeigen dies anhand ihrer Gefiederfarbe. Wir untersuchten die Auswirkung einer zusätzlichen Belastung (dem Stutzen von Flügel- und Schwanzfedern) auf die Energie aufwändige Inkubation bei Weibchen der Kohlmeise (Parus major). Wir nahmen dabei an, dass die Intensität der auf Karotinoiden basierenden Färbung der Brustfedern die Fähigkeit anzeigt, mit der energetisch kostspieligen Einschränkung der Flugfähigkeiten umzugehen. Sollte dies der Fall sein, sollten intensiver gefärbte Weibchen besser mit der zusätzlichen Belastung umgehen können, als weniger stark gefärbte Weibchen. Dementsprechend sollten der Masseverlust und die Nestattraktivität negativ mit der Gefiederfärbung korreliert sein. Weibchen mit gestutzten Federn nahmen stärker ab als die Weibchen der Kontrollgruppe, hatten aber nicht deutlich unattraktivere Nester, was darauf hindeutet, dass beeinträchtigte Weibchen die Mehrkosten durch die zusätzliche Belastung auf sich nehmen. Bereits schwache Weibchen wurden durch die zusätzliche Belastung stärker beeinträchtigt. Die Intensität der Färbung des Brustgefieders korrelierte weder mit Nestattraktivität noch mit Gewichtsverlust während der Inkubation. Das deutet darauf hin, dass die Färbung des Brustgefieders nicht auf die Fähigkeit der Stressbewältigung eines Weibchens während der Inkubation schließen lässt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–b
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundsen T (2000) Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol 15:149–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen T, Pärn H (2006) Female coloration: review of functional and nonfunctional hypotheses. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, volume II: function and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 280–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Prager M (2006) Quantifying colors. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, volume I: mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardia DR, Clotfelter ED (2007) Individual quality and age affect responses to an energetic constraint in a cavity-nesting bird. Behav Ecol 18:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitton PP, Dawson RD, Ochs CL (2008) Plumage characteristics, reproductive investment and assortative mating in Tree Swallows Tachycineta bicolor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1543–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleeker M, Kingma SA, Szentirmai I, Székely T, Komdeur J (2005) Body condition and clutch desertion in penduline tit Remiz pendulinus. Behaviour 142:1465–1478

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T (2009) Sexual selection in females. Anim Behav 77:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson RD, Bortolotti GR, Murza GL (2001) Sex-dependent frequency and consequences of natural handicaps in American Kestrels. J Avian Biol 32:351–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeming DC (2002) Avian incubation: behaviour, environment and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutrelant C, Grégoire A, Grnac N, Gomez D, Lambrechts MM, Perret P (2008) Female coloration indicates female reproductive capacity in blue tits. J Evol Biol 21:226–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Freeman-Gallant CR, De Coste J (2008) Geographic variation in the function of ornaments in the common yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas. J Avian Biol 39:66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (eds) (2001) Evolutionary ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Galván I, Moreno J (2009) Variation in effects of male plumage ornaments: the case of Iberian Pied Flycatchers. Ibis 151:541–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, Martin TE (2001) Fecundity-survival trade-offs and parental risk-taking in birds. Science 292:494–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A, Hails R (2002) Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Pryke SR (2006) Benefits to female birds of assessing color displays. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, volume II: function and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 233–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Parker TH, Olson VA (2006) Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim Behav 71:749–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggio M, Matessi G, Pilastro A (2005) Should I stay or should I go? Female brood desertion and male counterstrategy in rock sparrows. Behav Ecol 16:435–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggio M, Devigili A, Hoi H, Pilastro A (2009) Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow. Behav Ecol 20:1072–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggio M, Zanollo V, Hoi H (2010) Female ornamentation, parental quality and competitive ability in the rock sparrow. J Ethol. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s1016401002055

  • Hanssen SA, Folstad I, Erikstad KE (2006) White plumage reflects individual quality in female eiders. Anim Behav 71:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding AMA, Kitaysky AS, Hall ME, Welcker J, Karnovsky NJ, Talbot SL, Hamer KC, Grémillet D (2009) Flexibility in the parental effort of an Arctic-breeding seabird. Funct Ecol 23:348–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrap S, Quinn D (1996) Tits, nuthatches and treecreepers. A & C Black, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison F, Barta Z, Cuthill I, Székely T (2009) How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta-analysis. J Evol Biol 22:1800–1812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Garcia S (2006) The carotenoid-based plumage coloration of adult Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus correlates with the health status of their brood. Ibis 148:727–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (2002) A red bird in a brown bag. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson C, Andersson S (2008) Oxidative stress does not influence carotenoid mobilization and plumage pigmentation. Proc R Soc B 275:309–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson C, Ornborg J, Prager M, Andersson S (2008) Sex and age differences in reflectance and biochemistry of carotenoid-based colour variation in the great tit Parus major. Biol J Linn Soc 95:758–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly C, Price TD (2005) Correcting for regression to the mean in behavior and ecology. Am Nat 166:700–707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kluijver HN (1950) Daily routines of the great tit, Parus m. major L. Ardea 38:99–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld K, Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Komdeur J (2007) The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Anim Behav 74:657–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessels CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeat abilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville SU, Breitwisch R, Schilling AJ (1998) Plumage brightness as an indicator of parental care in northern cardinals. Anim Behav 55:119–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE, Montgomerie R (1985) Incubation feeding in snow buntings: female manipulation or indirect male parental care? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Mänd R, Tilgar V, Møller AP (2005) Negative relationship between plumage colour and breeding output in female great tits, Parus major. Evol Ecol Res 7:1013–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE (2008) Egg size variation among tropical and temperate songbirds: an embryonic temperature hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9268–9271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matysioková B, Remeš V (2010) Incubation feeding and nest attentiveness in a socially monogamous songbird: role of feather colouration, territory quality and ambient environment. Ethology 116:596–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauck RA, Grubb TC (1995) Petrel parents shunt all experimentally increased reproductive costs to their offspring. Anim Behav 49:999–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw KJ (2006) Mechanics of carotenoid-based coloration. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, volume I: mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Merilä J, Wiggins DA (1997) Mass loss in breeding blue tits: the role of energetic stress. J Anim Ecol 66:452–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Biard C, Blount JD, Houston DC, Ninni P, Saino N, Surai PF (2000) Carotenoid-dependent signals: indicators of foraging efficiency, immunocompetence or detoxification ability? Avian Poultry Biol Rev 11:137–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie R (2006) Analyzing colors. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, volume I: mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales J, Moreno J, Merino S, Sanz JJ, Tomás G, Arriero E, Lobato E, Puente JM (2007) Female ornaments in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: associations with age, health and reproductive success. Ibis 149:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy TG, Rosenthal MF, Montgomerie R, Tarvin KA (2009) Female American goldfinches use carotenoid-based bill coloration to signal status. Behav Ecol 20:1348–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro J, Gonzáles-Solís J (2007) Experimental increase of flying costs in a pelagic seabird on foraging strategies, nutritional state and chick condition. Oecologia 151:150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson VA, Owens IPF (1998) Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol Evol 13:510–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson VA, Owens IPF (2005) Interspecific variation in the use of carotenoid-based coloration in birds: diet, life history and phylogeny. J Evol Biol 18:1534–1546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada J, Senar J (2006) Comparing plumage colour measurements obtained directly from live birds and from collected feathers: the case of the great tit Parus major. J Avian Biol 37:609–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Andersen R, Pedersen HC (1993) Regulation of parental effort in a long-lived seabird: an experimental manipulation of the cost of reproduction in the Antarctic petrel, Thalassoica antarctica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JJ, Kranenbarg S, Tinbergen JM (2000) Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major). J Anim Ecol 69:74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Domènech J, Uribe F (2002a) Great tits (Parus major) reduce body mass in response to wing area reduction: a field experiment. Behav Ecol 13:725–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Figuerola J, Pascual J (2002b) Brighter yellow blue tits make better parents. Proc R Soc B 269:257–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005) Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration in female eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Evolution 59:1819–1828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1988) Ultimate adjustment of clutch size to parental feeding capacity in a passerine bird. Ecology 69:1918–1922

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1990) Influence of male and female quality on clutch size in tits (Parus spp.). Ecology 71:1258–1266

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Amundsen T (2000) Does female plumage coloration signal parental quality? A male removal experiment with the bluethroat (Luscinia s. svecica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. British Trust for Ornithology, London

  • Thomson DL, Monaghan P, Furness RW (1998) The demands of incubation and avian clutch size. Biol Rev 73:293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieleman BI, Dijkstra TH, Klasing KC, Visser GH, Williams JB (2008) Effects of experimentally increased costs of activity during reproduction on parental investment and self-maintenance in tropical house wrens. Behav Ecol 19:949–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen JM, Williams JB (2002) Energetics of incubation. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation: behaviour, environment and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 298–313

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schantz T, Bensch S, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Wittzell H (1999) Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc R Soc B 266:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb DR (1987) Thermal tolerance of avian embryos: a review. Condor 89:874–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins DA, Pärt T, Gustafsson L (1994) Correlates of clutch desertion by female Collared Flycatchers Ficedula albicollis. J Avian Biol 25:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JB (1996) Energetics of avian incubation. In: Carey C (ed) Avian energetics and nutritional ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 375–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW, Allen PE (1995) Effects of handicapping on female condition and reproduction in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Auk 112:737–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Boersma PD (1994) Causes of nest desertion during incubation in the Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus). Condor 96:1076–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerling JR, Ankney CD (2005) Variation in incubation patterns of red-winged blackbirds nesting at lagoons and ponds in eastern Ontario. Wilson Bull 117:280–290

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Freya Harrison and Miloš Krist for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education (MSM6198959212). It complies with the current laws of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata Matysioková.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Friedl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matysioková, B., Remeš, V. Responses to increased costs of activity during incubation in a songbird with female-only incubation: does feather colour signal coping ability?. J Ornithol 152, 337–346 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0594-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0594-9

Keywords

Navigation