Skip to main content
Log in

Alarm calls of the Southern House Wren Troglodytes musculus: variation with nesting stage and predator model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alarm calls given by parents when risk is detected during nesting may be considered a form of parental defense. We analyzed variations in callings of breeding pairs of the Southern House Wren Troglodytes musculus during the nesting cycle and when faced with different predator models. Nesting birds were exposed to stuffed models at different nesting stages (early and late during incubation, and nests with younger and older nestlings). Nests were also exposed to different predator models where the calling response of breeding adults and acoustic structure variations of the calls were analyzed. The presence of a predator model increased the parents’ alarm calls along the nesting stage. This result supports the hypothesis that the higher the nest reproductive value, the higher the nest defense performed by the Southern House Wren. However, it also supports the notion that alarm calls could be used by parents to silence nestlings and reduce their detectability. Alarm calls also varied according to the predator model presented. We suggest that alarm calls variations of Southern House Wrens could encode information about the kind of predator and the risk envisaged through variations of call rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackers SH, Slobodchikoff CN (1999) Communication of stimulus size and shape in alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs, Cynomys gunnisoni. Ethology 105:149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Wiklund G, Rundgren H (1980) Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim Behav 28:536–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Belles-Isles JC, Picman J (1986) House wren nest-destroying behavior. Condor 88:190–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Armitage KB (1997) Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally-specific calls. Anim Behav 53:143–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M, Saliva JE, Gochfeld D, Gochfeld D, Morales H (1989) Antipredator behaviour in nesting zenaida doves (Zenaida aurita): parental investment or offspring vulnerability? Behaviour 65:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T (2005) Antipredator defences in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Charif RA, Mitchell S, Clark CW (1995) Canary 1.2 user’s manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral MG (2007) Uso de claves auditivas en la evaluación del riesgo de depredación durante la cría de pichones en la ratona común, Troglodytes musculus. BSc Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behavior in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1987) Brood defence in the great tit: the influence of age, number and quality of young. Ardea 75:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis NB, Madden JR, Butchart SHM (2004) Learning fine-tunes a specific response of nestlings to the parental alarm calls of their own species. Proc R Soc Lond B271:2297–2304

    Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M, Travaini A, Zapata SC, Palomares F (2003) Alien mammals and the trophic position of the lesser grison (Galictis cuja) in Argentinean patagonia. Can J Zool 81:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson EC (2003) The Howard & Moore complete check-list of the birds of the world, 3rd edn. Christopher Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans CS (1997) Referential signals. Perspect Ethol 12:99–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans CS, Evans L, Marler P (1993a) On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in an avian vocal system. Anim Behav 46:23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans CS, Macedonia JM, Marler P (1993b) Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus gallus, to computer-generated simulations of aerial predators. Anim Behav 46:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichtel C, Perry S, Gros-Louis J (2005) Alarm calls of white-faced capuchin monkeys: an acoustic analysis. Anim Behav 70:165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficken MS (1990) Acoustic characteristics of alarm calls associated with predation risk in chickadees. Anim Behav 39:400–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed LA (1987) The Long-term pair bond of tropical house wrens: advantage or constrain? Am Nat 130:507–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill SA, Sealy SG (2003) Test of two functions of alarm calls given by yellow warblers during nest defence. Can J Zool 81:1685–1690

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill SA, Sealy SG (2004) Functional reference in an alarm signal given during nest defence: seet calls of yellow warblers denote brood-parasitic brown-headed cowbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1980) Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Anim Behav 28:604–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn S (1993) Ontogeny of the vocal repertoire in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Scand 24:267–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasson O (1991) Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predator. Trends Ecol Evol 6:325–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Högstad O (1995) Alarm calling by willow tits, Parus montanus, as mate investment. Anim Behav 49:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AW (1965) The birds of Chile and adjacent regions of Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru. Platt Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattan GH (1997) Shiny cowbirds follow the ‘shotgun’ strategy of brood parasitism. Anim Behav 53:647–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattan GH (1998) Impact of brood parasitism: why do house wrens accept shiny cowbird eggs? In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 212–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer S, Hoi H, Fessl B (1996) Alarm calls and chick reactions in the moustached warbler, Acrocephalus melanopogon. Anim Behav 51:1199–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer S, Fessl B, Hoi H (2005) Avian nest defence behaviour: assessment in relation to predator distance and type, and nest height. Anim Behav 69:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Klump GM, Curio E (1983) Reactions of blue tits Parus caeruleus to hawk models of different sizes. Bird Behav 4:78–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Klump GM, Kretzschmar E, Curio E (1986) The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:317–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiolo P, Tella JL, Carrete M, Serrano D, López G (2004) Distress calls may honestly signal bird quality to predators. Proc R Soc Lond B271:S513–S515

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavesley AJ, Magrath RD (2005) Communicating about danger: urgency alarm calling in a bird. Anim Behav 70:365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedonia JM, Evans CS (1993) Variation among mammalian alarm call systems and the problem of meaning in animal signals. Ethology 93:177–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrath RD, Platzen D, Kondo J (2006) From nestling calls to fledgling silence: adaptive timing of change in response to aerial alarm calls. Proc R Soc B273:2335–2341

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB (2001) The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proc R Soc Lond B268:2315–2324

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2002) Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends Cogn Sci 6:55–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (1955) Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P, Evans CS, Hauser MD (1992) Animals signals: motivational, referential, or both? In: Papousek H, Jürgens U, Papousek M (eds) Nonverbal vocal communication: comparative and developmental approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 66–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti CD (1996) Diet and trophic characteristics of great horned owls in Southwestern Idaho. J Field Ornithol 67:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezquida ET, Marone L (2003) Are results of artificial nest experiments a valid indicator of success of natural nest? Wilson Bull 115:270–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie R, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JL, Phillips LM (2000) Nesting habitat and success of the chimango caracara in Southern Chile. Wilson Bull 112:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Palleroni A, Hauser M, Marler P (2005) Do responses of galliform birds vary adaptively with predator size? Anim Cogn 8:200–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Platzen D, Magrath RD (2004) Parental alarm calls suppress nestling vocalization. Proc R Soc Lond B271:1271–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzen D, Magrath RD (2005) Adaptive differences in response to two types of parental alarm call in altricial nestlings. Proc R Soc Lond B272:1101–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribil S, Picman J (1991) Why house wrens destroy clutches of other birds: a support for the nest site competition hypothesis. Condor 93:184–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn MS, Holroyd GL (1989) Nestling and egg destruction by house wrens. Condor 91:206–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondo T, Carranza J (1989) Offspring reproductive value and nest defense in the magpie (Pica pica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra C (2008) Sentido funcional de los llamados de alarma durante la cría de pichones en la Ratona Común, Troglodytes aedon. BSc Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Skutch AF (1953) Life history of the southern house wren. Condor 55:121–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005) Allometry of alarm calls: Black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 308:1934–1937

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC (2007) Effects of shiny cowbirds Molothrus bonariensis parasitism on different components of house wren Troglodytes aedon reproductive success. Ibis 149:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Richardson DS, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J (2000) Experimental evidence for innate predator recognition in the Seychelles warbler. Proc R Soc Lond B267:2253–2258

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillermoz PA (2001) Dieta estacional y selección de presas del gato montés (Oncifelis geoffroyi) y zorro pampeano (Pseudalopex gymnocercus) en la Reserva de Vida Silvestre “Campos del Tuyú” (Bahía de Samborombón). BSc Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires

  • Warkentin DJ, Keeley ATH, Hare JF (2001) Repetitive calls of juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) communicates response urgency. Can J Zool 79:569–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead PJ (1979) Do savannah sparrows commit the concorde fallacy? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SR, Sanderson KJ, Evans CS (2000) Perception of terrestrial and aerial alarm calls by honeyeaters and falcons. Aust J Zool 48:127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman N, Dove CJ, Peurach SC (2005) A curious pellet from a great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). Northeast Nat 12:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Yensen E, Tarifa T (2003) Galictis cuja. Mammal Species 728:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Young BE (1994) Geographic and seasonal patterns of clutch-size variation in house wrens. Auk 111:545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistic analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Luis García and the owner of “La Esperanza” (General Lavalle) for allowing us to perform this study at their ranch. M. Beade from Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina provided logistical support during fieldwork. We thank M.G. Corral, N.M. Duré Ruiz, C. Haupt, P. Llambías, M.E. Mermoz and C. Serra for their collaboration in the field and C. Penedo, M. Carro, J. Crespo and two anonymous reviewers for corrections and suggestions to an earlier version of this paper. F.M. Gabelli lent us the audio-recording equipment. This study was supported by grants to G.J.F. from Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT, Programación 2004–2007, UBACYT-X007) and Neotropical Grassland Conservancy (Equipment Grant, 2003). All methods used in the present study meet the ethical requirements for science research of the University of Buenos Aires and comply with the current laws of our country.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo J. Fernández.

Additional information

Communicated by P. H. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fasanella, M., Fernández, G.J. Alarm calls of the Southern House Wren Troglodytes musculus: variation with nesting stage and predator model. J Ornithol 150, 853–863 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0406-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0406-2

Keywords

Navigation