Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simultaneous slice excitation for accelerated passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) in MR-guided needle interventions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To accelerate a passive tracking sequence based on phase-only cross correlation (POCC) using simultaneous slice excitation.

Methods

For magnetic resonance (MR)-guided biopsy procedures, passive markers have been proposed that can be automatically localized online using a POCC-based tracking sequence. To accelerate the sequence, a phase-offset multiplanar (POMP) excitation technique was implemented to acquire tracking images. In a phantom experiment, the POMP–POCC sequence was tested and compared with the sequential non-accelerated version in terms of duration and accuracy. Further, technical feasibility of the POMP–POCC sequence was tested in a patient undergoing a prostate biopsy.

Results

The temporal resolution of the POMP–POCC tracking sequence is accelerated by 33% compared with the sequential approach. In phantom experiments, the POMP–POCC and sequential sequences yielded the same targeting accuracy of 1.6 ± 0.7 mm. Technical proof of concept of the new sequence could be demonstrated in a successful in vivo prostate biopsy.

Conclusion

POMP–POCC tracking can substantially reduce the duration of localization of passive markers in MR-guided needle interventions without compromising targeting accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bock M, Wacker FK (2008) MR-guided intravascular interventions: techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:326–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS (2008) MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:311–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewin JS, Petersilge CA, Hatem SF, Duerk JL, Lenz G, Clampitt ME et al (1998) Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system. Am J Roentgenol 170:1593–1601. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Susil RC, Camphausen K, Choyke P, McVeigh ER, Gustafson GS, Ning H et al (2004) System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 52:683–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Krieger A, Susil RC, Menard C, Coleman JA, Fichtinger G, Atalar E et al (2005) Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52:306–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.840497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, Lenk S, Loening SA, Taupitz M (2005) MR, imaging-guided Prostate Biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results 1. Radiology 234:576–581. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2342031887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alt S, Homagk A-K, Umathum R, Semmler W, Bock M (2010) Active microcoil tracking in the lungs using a semisolid rubber as signal source. Magn Reson Med 64:271–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nitz WR, Oppelt A, Renz W, Manke C, Lenhart M, Link J (2001) On the heating of linear conductive structures as guide wires and catheters in interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200101)13:1%3c105:AID-JMRI1016%3e3.0.CO;2-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Oliveira A, Rauschenberg J, Beyersdorff D, Semmler W, Bock M (2008) Automatic passive tracking of an endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only cross-correlation. Magn Reson Med 59:1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krafft AJ, Zamecnik P, Maier F, de Oliveira A, Hallscheidt P, Schlemmer H-P et al (2013) Passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) for MR-guided needle interventions: initial in vivo experience. Phys Med 29:607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zamecnik P, Schouten MG, Krafft AJ, Maier F, Schlemmer H-P, Barentsz JO et al (2014) Automated real-time needle-guide tracking for fast 3-T MR-guided transrectal prostate biopsy: a feasibility study. Radiology 273:879–886. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Souza SP, Szumowski J, Dumoulin CL, Glover G (1988) SIMA: simultaneous multisclice acquisition of MR Images by hadamard-encoded excitation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:1026–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Glover GH (1991) Phase-offset multiplanar (POMP) volume imaging: a new technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880010410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barth M, Breuer F, Koopmans PJ, Norris DG, Poser BA (2016) Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med 75:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reichert A, Reiss S, Bock M, Krafft AJ (2017) Simultaneous slice excitation for accelerated passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) in MR-guided needle interventions. Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. ISMRM, Honolulu, p 2616

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krafft AJ, Jenne JW, Maier F, Stafford RJ, Huber PE, Semmler W et al (2010) A long arm for ultrasound: a combined robotic focused ultrasound setup for magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Med Phys 37:2380–2393. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3377777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schouten MG, Ansems J, Renema WKJ, Bosboom D, Scheenen TWJ, Fütterer JJ (2010) The accuracy and safety aspects of a novel robotic needle guide manipulator to perform transrectal prostate biopsies. Med Phys 37:4744–4750. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3475945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ball MW, Ross AE, Ghabili K, Kim C, Jun C, Petrisor D et al (2017) Safety and feasibility of direct magnetic resonance imaging-guided transperineal prostate biopsy using a novel magnetic resonance imaging-safe robotic device. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zijlstra F, Bouwman JG, Braškutė I, Viergever MA, Seevinck PR (2017) Fast fourier-based simulation of off-resonance artifacts in steady-state gradient echo MRI applied to metal object localization. Magn Reson Med 78:2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmermann H, Müller S, Gutmann B, Bardenheuer H, Melzer A, Umathum R et al (2006) Targeted-HASTE imaging with automated device tracking for MR-guided needle interventions in closed-bore MR systems. Magn Reson Med 56:481–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant number HA 7006/1-1. The authors thank Dr.-Ing. Florian Maier (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) for the help with the sequence implementation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AR: study conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafting of manuscript; MB: study conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of manuscript, critical revision; SR and CGO: data acquisition; JJF: critical revision; AJK: study conception and design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; critical revision

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Reichert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reichert, A., Bock, M., Reiss, S. et al. Simultaneous slice excitation for accelerated passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) in MR-guided needle interventions. Magn Reson Mater Phy 31, 781–788 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-018-0701-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-018-0701-0

Keywords

Navigation