Skip to main content
Log in

Design of actively shielded main magnets: an improved functional method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved functional approach for designing MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) main magnets with active shielding is presented. By nulling one or two external moments as well as a certain series of internal moments of the magnetic field, new designs with improved shielding in combination with or without shorter magnet lengths are obtained. The improved method can be employed to design short and practical superconducting magnets at any given field strength. The resulting designs yield the desired field homogeneity inside the region of interest without using superconducting shim coils. This approach requires only a modest amount of computing power. One of the design steps, a contour plot of the continuous current solutions, can be utilized to study stretch goals for favorable design parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morrow G (2000) Progress in MRI magnets. IEEE Trans. Appl Supercon 10:744–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DeMeester G, Morich M, Byrne A, Davies F, Melotte D, Thomas A (2002) Challenges of short magnet design. Magn Res Mat Phys Bio Med 13:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalafala AK (1990) A design approach for actively shielded magnetic resonance imaging magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 26:1181–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalafala AK (1991) Optimized configurations for actively shielded magnetic resonance imaging magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 27:1696–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson MR, Brown RW, Srivastava VC (1994) An inverse approach to the design of MRI main magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 30:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown RW, Fujita H, Shvartsman SM, Thompson MR, Morich MA, Petropoulos LS, Srivastava VC (1998) New applications of inverse methods in the design of MRI coils. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 9:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crozier S, Doddrell DM (1997) Compact MRI magnet design by stochastic optimization. J Magn Res 127:233–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crozier S and Doddrell DM. Magnets for magnetic resonance systems. US Patent 5,818,319, (1998)

  9. Zhao H, Crozier S, Doddrell DM (2000) A hybrid, inverse approach to the design of magnetic resonance imaging magnets. Med. Phys 27:599–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao H, Crozier S, Doddrell DM (2001) Compact clinical MRI magnet design using a multi-layer current density approach. Magn Res Med 45:331–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crozier S, Zhao H, Doddrell DM (2002) Current density mapping approach for design of clinical magnetic resonance imaging magnets. Concepts in Magn Res 15: 208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ansorge RE, Carpenter TA, Hall LD, Shaw NR, Williams GB(2000) Use of parallel supercomputing to design magnetic resonance systems. IEEE Trans Appl Supercon 10:1368–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw NR, Ansorge RE (2002) Genetic algorithms for MRI magnet design. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercon. 12:733–736

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smythe WR (1950) Static and dynamic electricity. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 275

  15. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in fortran: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, New York:

  16. Wilson MN (1983) Superconducting magnets. Oxford University Press, New York

  17. Iwasa Y (1994) Case studies in superconducting magnets: design and operational issues. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Sciver SW, Marken KR (2002) Superconducting magnets above 20 Tesla. Physics Today 55: 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palkovich A, Bird JM, Morad R (1991) Integrated active shielded magnet system. US Patent 5,012,217,

  20. Brown RW, Shvartsman ShM (1999) Supershielding: confinement of magnetic and electric fields. Phys Rev Lett 83:1946–1949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following people who have provided many useful discussions in the design of main magnets: Roger Efferson and Roger Wheatley at American Magnetics, Gordon DeMeester and Vishnu Srivastava at Philips Medical Systems, Stuart Crozier at University of Queensland, Australia, and Nick Shaw at University of Cambridge, England. This research is supported by NIH R21 RR15211–01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Chung N. Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, YC.N., Eagan, T.P., Brown, R.W. et al. Design of actively shielded main magnets: an improved functional method. Magn Reson Mater Phy 16, 57–67 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-003-0012-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-003-0012-x

Keywords

Navigation