Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we used the inverse distance weighting (IDW) method to estimate the rainfall distribution in the middle of Taiwan. We evaluated the relationship between interpolation accuracy and two critical parameters of IDW: power (α value), and a radius of influence (search radius). A total of 46 rainfall stations and rainfall data between 1981 and 2010 were used in this study, of which the 12 rainfall stations belonging to the Taichung Irrigation Association (TIA) were used for cross-validation. To obtain optimal interpolation data of rainfall, the value of the radius of influence, and the control parameter-α were determined by root mean squared error. The results show that the optimal parameters for IDW in interpolating rainfall data have a radius of influence up to 10–30 km in most cases. However, the optimal α values varied between zero and five. Rainfall data of interpolation using IDW can obtain more accurate results during the dry season than in the flood season. High correlation coefficient values of over 0.95 confirmed IDW as a suitable method of spatial interpolation to predict the probable rainfall data in the middle of Taiwan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedient PB, Huber WC (1992) Hydrology and floodplain analysis, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu SL, Zhou ZY, Yuan L, Chen QG (2008) Study on spatial precipitation interpolation methods. Pratacult Sci 25(6):19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statics for spatial data (revised edition). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Devijver PA, Kittler J (1982) Pattern recognition: a statistical approach. Prentice-hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks KN, Hay JE, Stow CD (1998) High resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk Island Part II: interpolation of rainfall data. J Hydrol 208:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong XH, Bo HJ, Deng X, Su J, Wang X (2009) Rainfall spatial interpolation methods and their applications to Qingjiang river basin. J China Three Gorges Univ (Nat Sci) 31(6):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZM, Yang YZ, Ding XQ, Lin ZH (2004) Optimization of the spatial interpolation methods for climate resources. Geograph Res 23(5):357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationship. Wiley, New York

  • Garcia M, Peters-Lidard CD, Goodrich DC (2008) Spatial interpolation of precipitation in a dense gauge network for monsoon storm events in the southwestern United States. Water Resour Res 44:W05S13(1–14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser S (1993) Predictive inference. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmer M, Becker S, Jiang T (2004) Observed monthly precipitation trends in China 1951–2002. Theor Appl Climatol 77:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2000) Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol 228:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyalistras D (2003) Development and validation of a high-resolution monthly gridded temperature and precipitation data set for Switzerland (1951–2000). Clim Res 25(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh HH, Cheng SJ, Liou JY, Chou SC, Siao BR (2006) Characterization of spatially distributed summer daily rainfall. J Chin Agric Eng 52(1):47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KB, Beswick AR (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environ Model Softw 16(4):309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol 2, no 12. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 1137–1143

  • Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) Special issue on applications of machine learning and the knowledge discovery process. Mach Learn 30(2–3):271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong YF, Tong WW (2008) Spatial exploration and interpolation of the surface precipitation data. Geograph Res 27(5):1097–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman D, Navon S, Morin E (2009) Improving interpolation of daily precipitation for hydrologic modeling: spatial patterns of preferred interpolators. Hydrol Process 23:3281–3291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam NS-N (1983) Spatial interpolation methods: a review. Am Cartogr 10:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Heap AD (2008) Spatial interpolation methods: a review for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record. Geoscience Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JL, Zhang J, Zhang C, Chen QG (2006) Analyze and compare the spatial interpolation methods for climate factor. Pratacult Sci 23(8):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Huang JF, Jin ZF, Liu ZY (2010) Methods for calculation precipitation spatial distribution of Zhejiang Province based on GIS. J Zhejiang Univ (Sci Ed) 27(2):239–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin XS, Yu Q (2008) Study on the spatial interpolation of agroclimatic resources in Chongqing. J Anhui Agric 36(30):13431–13463, 13470

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd CD (2005) Assessing the effect of integrating elevation data into the estimation of monthly precipitation in Great Britain. J Hydrol 308:128–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu GY, Wong DW (2008) An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput Geosci 34(9):1044–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan GJ, Ambroise K-A, Do C (2004) Analyzing microarray gene expression data. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naoum S, Tsanis IK (2004) A multiple linear regression GIS module using spatial variables to model orographic rainfall. J Hydroinform 6:39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Phogat V, Yadav AK, Malik RS, Kumar S, Cox J (2010) Simulation of salt and water movement and estimation of water productivity of rice crop irrigated with saline water. Paddy Water Environ 8:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price DT, McKenney DW, Nalder IA, Hutchison MF, Kesteven JL (2000) A comparison of two statistical methods for interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data. Agric Meteorol 101:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman RS (1983) Objective analysis accuracies of statistical interpolation and successive correction schemes. J Aust Meteorol Mag 31:225–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Segond M-L, Neokleous N, Makropoulos C, Onof C, Maksimovic C (2007) Simulation and spatio-temporal disaggregation of multi-site rainfall data for urban drainage applications. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):917–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simanton JR, Osborn HB (1980) Reciprocal-distance estimate of point rainfall. J Hydraul Eng 106(7):1242–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Traore S, Wang YM, Kan CE, Kerh T, Leu JM (2010) A mixture neural methodology for computing rice consumptive water requirements in Fada N’Gourma Region, Eastern Burkina Faso. Paddy Water Environ 8:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung YK (1983) Point rainfall estimation for a mountainous region. J Hydraul Eng 109(10):1386–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li CK, Chen L, Zheng SN (2008) Analysis on impact of weight to spatial interpolation methods. J Hunan Univ Sci Technol (Nat Sci Ed) 23(4):77–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Wu XJ, Xiao CC, Tian Y (2010) On temporal and spatial error distribution of five precipitation interpolation models. Geogr Geo-Inf Sci 26(3):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh HC, Chen YC, Wei C, Chen RH (2011) Entropy and kriging approach to rainfall network design. Paddy Water Environ 9:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong JJ (2010) A comparative study of spatial interpolation precision of annual average precipitation based on GIS in Xinjiang. Desert Oasis Meteorol 4(4):51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu HY, Jia SF (2004) Uncertainty in the spatial interpolation of rainfall data. Prog Geogr 23(2):34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang LW, Wang SL (2003) Spatial interpolation methods of daily weather data in Northeast China. Quart J Appl Meteorol 14(5):605–616

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

    Feng-Wen Chen & Chen-Wuing Liu

  2. Agricultural Engineering Research Center, Zhongli, 32061, Taiwan

    Feng-Wen Chen

Authors
  1. Feng-Wen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chen-Wuing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Wuing Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, FW., Liu, CW. Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 10, 209–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0319-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0319-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation