Skip to main content
Log in

Decreasing Pin1 suppressed the properties of migratory and invasive in colorectal carcinoma SW620 cells

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of Pin1 on the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in human colorectal carcinoma SW620 cells.

Methods

We constructed a eukaryotic expression vector of RNA interfering (shRNA) for Pin1 gene (pGenesil-1-Pin1), and then observed its expression in SW620 cells by Western blotting. The cells motility were tested by wound healing assay and Boyden chamber assay. The protein levels and activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were tested by Western blotting and Gelatin zymography in SW620 cells after transfected with pGenesil-1-PIN1.

Results

pGenesil-1-PIN1 was successfully constructed, which was confirmed by sequencing. Silencing the Pin1 by RNAi significantly decreased the cells motility from 96.4 ± 3.9 per field (× 10 objective) to 52.7 ± 4.4 per field (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test) for SW620 cells transfected with pGenesil-1-PIN1 (SW620/p-shRNA) in Boyden chamber assay, and reduced the MMP-2 and MMP-9 expressions and activity in SW620 cells. The protein relative levels of MMP-2 were 0.32 ± 0.04 for SW620/p-shRNA, and 0.76 ± 0.03 for SW620/p-Con; MMP-9 were 0.41 ± 0.09 for SW620/p-shRNA, and 0.94 ± 0.07 for SW620/p-Con (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Inhibited Pin1 expression may contribute to the suppression of the invasive and metastatic capacity of colon cancer cells in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rippmann JF, Hobbie S, Daiber C, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent proline isomerization catalyzed by Pin1 is essential for tumor cell survival and entry into mitosis. Cell Growth Differ, 2000, 11: 409–416.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ranganathan R, Lu KP, Hunter T, et al. Structural and functional analysis of the mitotic rotamase Pin1 suggests substrate recognition is phosphorylation dependent. Cell, 1997, 89: 876–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao L, Kimzey A, Sauter G, et al. Prevalent overexpression of prolyl isomerase Pin1 in human cancers. Am J Pathol, 2004, 164: 1727–1737.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantovani F, Tocco F, Girardini J, et al. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 orchestrates p53 acetylation and dissociation from the apoptosis inhibitor iASPP. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2007, 14: 912–920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh ES, Lew BO, Means AR. The loss of PIN1 deregulates cyclin E and sensitizes mouse embryo fibroblasts to genomic instability. J Biol Chem, 2006, 281: 241–251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu J, Zhao J, Yang JM. The expression of Pin1, β-catenin and cyclin D1 in elderly lung carcinomas and their significance. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2008, 7: 379–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu YX, Manley JL. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 functions in mitotic chromosome condensation. Mol Cell, 2007, 26: 287–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Couzin J. Breakthrough of the year. Small RNAs make big splah. Science, 2002, 298: 2296–2297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosher JM, Labouesse M. RNA interference: genetic wand and genetic wand and genetic watchdog. Nat Cell Biol, 2002, 2: E31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elbashir SM, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs. Genes Dev, 2001, 15: 188–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 1998, 391: 806–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lippens G, Landrieu I, Smet C. Molecular mechanisms of the phospho- dependent prolyl cis/trans isomerase Pin1. FEBS J, 2007, 274: 5211–5222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi Y, Kawahara F, Noguchi M, et al. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in human breast cancer cells overexpressing cyclooxygenase-1 or -2. FEBS Lett, 1999, 460: 145–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivula A, Talvensaari-Mattila A, Lundin J, et al. Association of cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2005, 89: 215–220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks PC, Stromblad S, Sanders LC, et al. Localization of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-2 to the surface of invasive cells by interaction with integrin alpha v beta 3. Cell, 1996, 85: 683–693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dohadwala M, Batra RK, Luo, J, et al. Autocrine/paracrine prostaglandin E2 production by non-small cell lung cancer cells regulates matrix metalloproteinase-2 and CD44 in cyclooxygenase-2-dependentin-vasion. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277: 50828–50833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han C, Wu T. Cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandin E2 promotes human cholangiocarcinoma cell growth and invasion through EP1 receptor-mediated activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and Akt. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280: 24053–24063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu Q, Stamenkovic I. Localization of matrix metalloproteinase 9 to the cell surface provides a mechanism for CD44-mediated tumor invasion. Genes Dev, 1999, 13: 35–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niuliang Cheng.

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the Science and Technology Project of Shanxi Province, China (No. 2006031087-02).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qin, L., Hao, H., Li, M. et al. Decreasing Pin1 suppressed the properties of migratory and invasive in colorectal carcinoma SW620 cells. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 9, 216–220 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-010-0013-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-010-0013-y

Key words

Navigation