Abstract
Humic substances from soils and sediments can be defined as surface active substances based on the surface tension measurements. Although there are several micellar structural models of humic substances currently available, few studies evaluating humic substances as surfactants have been conducted to date. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of humic substances and their derivatives to influence surface tension. We found that the ability of a humic substance to influence the surface tension of a solution depends on its origin. Many industrially produced humic materials exerted little or no impact on surface tension, whereas humic substances isolated from natural environments (water, soil, peat, sediments, sludge from wastewater treatment facilities) exerted a large impact on surface tension. These findings indicate that the modification of humic substances can enable their use as surfactants. In addition, these findings indicate that solutions of humic substances and their derivatives can be used to increase the solubility of organic compounds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almendros G (1994) Effects of different chemical modifications on peat humic acid and their bearing on some agro-biological characteristics of soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25:2711–2736
Chen Y, Senesi N, Schnitzer M (1977) Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:352–358
Engebretson RR, von Wandruszka R (1994) Microorganization in dissolved humic acids. Environ Sci Technol 28:1934–1941. doi:10.1021/es00060a026
Engebretson RR, von Wandruszka R (1996) Quantitative approach to humic acid associations. Environ Sci Technol 30:990–997. doi:10.1021/es950478g
Heinze T, Liebert T (2001) Unconventional methods in cellulose functionalization. Prog Polym Sci 26:1689–1762. doi:10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00022-3
Jung AV, Frochot C, Parant S, Lartiges BS, Selve C, Viriot ML et al (2005) Synthesis of amino-phenolic humic-like substances and comparison with natural aquatic humic acids: a multi-analytical techniques approach. Org Geochem 36:1252–1271. doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.04.004
Lippold H, Gottschalch U, Kupsch H (2008) Joint influence of surfactants and humic matter on PAH solubility. Are mixed micelles formed? Chemosphere 70:1979–1986. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.09.040
Lu QX, Hanna JV, Johnson WD (2000) Source indicators of humic substances: an elemental composition, solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR and Py-GC/MS study. Appl Geochem 15:1019–1033. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00103-1
Piccolo A, Conte P, Cozzolino A (2001) Chromatographic and spectrophotometric properties of dissolved humic substances compared with macromolecular polymers. Soil Sci 166:174–185. doi:10.1097/00010694-200103000-00003
Schulten HR, Schnitzer M (1993) The state of the art structural concept for humic substances. Naturwissenschaften 80:29–30. doi:10.1007/BF01139754
Simpson MJ, Simpson AJ, Hatcher PG (2004) Noncovalent interactions between aromatic compounds and dissolved humic acid examined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 23:355–362
Tan KH (2005) Soil sampling, preparation, and analysis, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York
Terashima M, Fukushima M, Tanaka S (2004) Influence of pH on the surface activity of humic acid: micelle-like aggregate formation and interfacial adsorption. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 247:77–83. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.08.028
Wershaw RL (1993) Model for humus in soils and sediments. Environ Sci Technol 27:814–816. doi:10.1021/es00042a603
Zavarzina AG, Demin VV, Nifanteva TI, Shkinev VM, Danilova TV, Spivakov BY (2002) Extraction of humic acids and their fractions in poly(ethylene glycol)-based aqueous biphasic systems. Anal Chim Acta 452:95–103. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01428-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klavins, M., Purmalis, O. Humic substances as surfactants. Environ Chem Lett 8, 349–354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0232-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0232-z