Skip to main content
Log in

Temporallappenepilepsien – Ätiologie und elektroklinische Subtypen

Temporal lobe epilepsies—etiology and electroclinical subtypes

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Epileptologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Temporallappenepilepsien sind die häufigsten fokalen Epilepsien.

Fragestellung

Darstellung von ätiologischen und elektroklinischen Subtypen von Temporallappenepilepsien.

Material und Methode

Zusammenfassung und Diskussion der wesentlichen Literatur über wichtige ätiologische und elektroklinische Subtypen von Temporallappenepilepsien.

Ergebnisse

Die wichtigsten ätiologischen Subtypen sind die mesialen Temporallappenepilepsien mit Hippocampussklerose (MTLE-HS), die läsionellen Temporallappenepilepsien und die MR-negative Temporallappenepilepsien. Bei MTLE-HS sind initial präzipitierende Ereignisse (insbesondere komplizierte Fieberkrämpfe) häufig, der Erkrankungsbeginn ist früh, bilaterale tonisch-klonische Anfälle sind selten, in 50–90 % besteht medikamentöse Therapieresistenz. Häufige Ursachen von läsionellen Temporallappenepilepsien sind langzeitepilepsieassoziierte neuroepitheliale Tumoren (LEAT), fokale kortikale Dysplasien und Kavernome. Bei Magnetresonanz-Tomographie (MR)-negativen Temporallappenepilepsien sind initial präzipitierende Ereignisse selten, der Erkrankungsbeginn ist spät, bilaterale tonisch-klonische Anfälle sind häufig, 55–60 % sind gut behandelbar. Hinsichtlich der elektroklinischen Subtypen können mesiale Subtypen, ein temporopolarer Subtyp, ein mesiolateraler Subtyp, ein lateraler Subtyp und ein Temporal-„Plus“-Subtyp unterschieden werden.

Schlussfolgerungen

Temporallappenepilepsien sind komplexe Netzwerkerkrankungen. Die funktionellen und strukturellen Veränderungen sind im Allgemeinen räumlich wesentlich ausgedehnter als die in der MRT fassbare strukturelle Läsion und gehen oft über den Temporallappen hinaus. Die einzelnen elektroklinischen Subtypen zeigen beträchtliche Überlappungen in der klinischen Anfallssemiologie und können bei allen Ätiologien vorkommen.

Abstract

Background

Temporal lobe epilepsies are the most frequent form of focal epilepsy.

Objective

Presentation of the etiological and electroclinical subtypes of temporal lobe epilepsies.

Material and methods

Summary and discussion of the relevant literature on important etiological and electroclinical subtypes of temporal lobe epilepsies.

Results

The most important etiological subtypes are mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS), lesional temporal lobe epilepsies and magnetic resonance (MR) negative temporal lobe epilepsies. In MTLE-HS initially precipitating incidents (especially complicated febrile convulsions) are frequent, seizure onset is at an early age, bilateral tonic-clonic seizures are rare and seizures become drug-refractory in 50–90% of cases. Frequent causes of lesional temporal lobe epilepsies include long-term epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEAT), focal cortical dysplasia and cavernous angiomas. In MR negative temporal lobe epilepsies initially precipitating incidents are rare, seizure onset is at a later age, bilateral tonic-clonic seizures are frequent and seizures can be controlled in 55–60% of cases. With respect to electroclinical subtypes, mesial subtypes, a temporopolar subtype, a mesiolateral subtype, a lateral subtype and a temporal plus subtype can be distinguished.

Conclusion

Temporal lobe epilepsies are complex network diseases. Functional and structural alterations are usually spatially more widely distributed than lesions visible on MRI and frequently extend beyond the temporal lobe. The individual electroclinical syndromes show considerable overlapping in clinical seizure semiology and can occur with all etiologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barba C, Barbati G, Minotti L et al (2007) Ictal clinical and scalp-EEG findings differentiating temporal lobe epilepsies from temporal ‘plus’ epilepsies. Brain 130:1957–1967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barba C, Rheims S, Minotti L et al (2016) Temporal plus epilepsy is a major determinant of temporal lobe surgery failures. Brain 139:444–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner C, Lindinger G, Ebner A et al (1995) Propagation of interictal epileptic activity in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 45:118–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumcke I, Aronica E, Becker A et al (2016) Low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumours—the 2016 WHO classification. Nat Rev Neurol 12:732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumcke I, Spreafico R, Haaker G et al (2017) Histopathological findings in brain tissue obtained during epilepsy surgery. N Engl J Med 377:1648–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumcke I, Thom M, Aronica E et al (2013) International consensus classification of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: a task force report from the ILAE Commission on Diagnostic Methods. Epilepsia 54:1315–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burkholder DB, Sulc V, Hoffman EM et al (2014) Interictal scalp electroencephalography and intraoperative electrocorticography in magnetic resonance imaging-negative temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. JAMA Neurol 71:702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chabardes S, Kahane P, Minotti L et al (2005) The temporopolar cortex plays a pivotal role in temporal lobe seizures. Brain 128:1818–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chassoux F, Artiges E, Semah F et al (2016) Determinants of brain metabolism changes in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 57:907–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chassoux F, Artiges E, Semah F et al (2017) (18)F-FDG-PET patterns of surgical success and failure in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 88:1045–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung MY, Walczak TL, Lewis DV et al (1991) Temporal lobectomy and independent bitemporal interictal activity: what degree of lateralization is sufficient? Epilepsia 32:195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cloppenborg T, May TW, Blumcke I et al (2016) Trends in epilepsy surgery: stable surgical numbers despite increasing presurgical volumes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87:1322–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dupont S, Samson Y, Nguyen-Michel VH et al (2015) Are auras a reliable clinical indicator in medial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis? Eur J Neurol 22:1310–1316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dupont S, Samson Y, Nguyen-Michel VH et al (2015) Lateralizing value of semiology in medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 132:401–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebersole JS, Pacia SV (1996) Localization of temporal lobe foci by ictal EEG patterns. Epilepsia 37:386–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebersole JS, Wade PB (1991) Spike voltage topography identifies two types of frontotemporal epileptic foci. Neurology 41:1425–1431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gambardella A, Gotman J, Cendes F et al (1995) Focal intermittent delta activity in patients with mesiotemporal atrophy: a reliable marker of the epileptogenic focus. Epilepsia 36:122–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gok B, Jallo G, Hayeri R et al (2013) The evaluation of FDG-PET imaging for epileptogenic focus localization in patients with MRI positive and MRI negative temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroradiology 55:541–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Helmstaedter C, May TW, Von Lehe M et al (2014) Temporal lobe surgery in Germany from 1988 to 2008: diverse trends in etiological subgroups. Eur J Neurol 21:827–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Henkel A, Noachtar S, Pfander M et al (2002) The localizing value of the abdominal aura and its evolution: a study in focal epilepsies. Neurology 58:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jehi L, Friedman D, Carlson C et al (2015) The evolution of epilepsy surgery between 1991 and 2011 in nine major epilepsy centers across the United States, Germany, and Australia. Epilepsia 56:1526–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kahane P, Bartolomei F (2010) Temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis: lessons from depth EEG recordings. Epilepsia 51(Suppl 1):59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knake S, Triantafyllou C, Wald LL et al (2005) 3T phased array MRI improves the presurgical evaluation in focal epilepsies: a prospective study. Neurology 65:1026–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krendl R, Lurger S, Baumgartner C (2008) Absolute spike frequency predicts surgical outcome in TLE with unilateral hippocampal atrophy. Neurology 71:413–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Labate A, Aguglia U, Tripepi G et al (2016) Long-term outcome of mild mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Neurology 86:1904–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maillard L, Vignal JP, Gavaret M et al (2004) Semiologic and electrophysiologic correlations in temporal lobe seizure subtypes. Epilepsia 45:1590–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Muhlhofer W, Tan YL, Mueller SG et al (2017) MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy—what do we know? Epilepsia 58:727–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’brien TJ, Kazemi NJ, Cascino GD (1997) Localization-related epilepsies due to specific lesions. In: Engel JJ, Pedley TA (Hrsg) Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, S 2433–2446

    Google Scholar 

  29. O’brien TJ, Kilpatrick C, Murrie V et al (1996) Temporal lobe epilepsy caused by mesial temporal sclerosis and temporal neocortical lesions. A clinical and electroencephalographic study of 46 pathologically proven cases. Brain 119:2133–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pfander M, Arnold S, Henkel A et al (2002) Clinical features and EEG findings differentiating mesial from neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy. Epileptic Disord 4:189–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Risinger MW, Engel JJ, Van Ness PC et al (1989) Ictal localization of temporal lobe seizures with scalp/sphenoidal recordings. Neurology 39:1288–1293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosati A, Aghakhani Y, Bernasconi A et al (2003) Intractable temporal lobe epilepsy with rare spikes is less severe than with frequent spikes. Neurology 60:1290–1295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scanlon C, Mueller SG, Cheong I et al (2013) Grey and white matter abnormalities in temporal lobe epilepsy with and without mesial temporal sclerosis. J Neurol 260:2320–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Semah F, Picot MC, Adam C et al (1998) Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence? Neurology 51:1256–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Suresh S, Sweet J, Fastenau PS et al (2015) Temporal lobe epilepsy in patients with nonlesional MRI and normal memory: an SEEG study. J Neurosurg 123:1368–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tatum WOT (2012) Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 29:356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wassenaar M, Leijten FSS, De Haan GJ et al (2017) Electro-clinical criteria and surgical outcome: is there a difference between mesial and lesional temporal lobe epilepsy? Acta Neurol Scand 136:708–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wellmer J, Quesada CM, Rothe L et al (2013) Proposal for a magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the detection of epileptogenic lesions at early outpatient stages. Epilepsia 54:1977–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wieser HG (2004) ILAE Commission Report. Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia 45:695–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Baumgartner.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Baumgartner, J.P. Koren, C. Lang und L. Zoche geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumgartner, C., Koren, J.P., Lang, C. et al. Temporallappenepilepsien – Ätiologie und elektroklinische Subtypen. Z. Epileptol. 33, 6–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-020-00312-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-020-00312-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation