Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wetlands as energy-dissipating systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

Abstract

Since wetlands are ecosystems that have an ample supply of water, they play an important role in the energy budgets of their respective landscapes due to their capacity to shift energy fluxes in favor of latent heat. Rates of evapotranspiration in wetlands are commonly as high as 6–15 mm day−1, testifying to the large amount of energy that is dissipated through this process. Emergent or semi-emergent wetland macrophytes substantially influence the solar energy distribution due to their high capacity for transpiration. Wetland ecosystems in eutrophic habitats show a high primary production of biomass because of the highly efficient use of solar energy in photosynthesis. In wetlands associated with the slow decomposition of dead organic matter, such as oligotrophic marshes or fens and bogs, the accumulation of biomass is also high, in spite of the rather low primary production of biomass. Most of the energy exchange in water-saturated wetlands is, however, linked with heat balance, whereby the largest proportion of the incoming energy is dissipated during the process of evapotranspiration. An example is shown of energy fluxes during the course of a day in the wetland ecosystem of Mokré Louky (Wet Meadows) near Třeboň. The negative consequences of the loss of wetlands for the local and regional climate are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blankenship RB (2002) Molecular mechanisms of phostosynthesis. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowen IS (1926) The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by this magnitude and the diminution of the aerodynamic evaporation from any water surface. Phys Rev 27:779–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brom J, Pokorný J (2009) Temperature and humidity characteristics of two willow stands, a peaty meadow and a drained pasture and their impact on landscape functioning. Boreal Environ Res 14:389–403

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper JP (1975) Photosynthesis and productivity in different environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dykyjová D, Květ J (eds) (1978) Pond littoral ecosystems: structure and functioning (Ecological Studies 28). Springer, Berlin

  6. Gates DM (1980) Biophysical ecology. Dover, New York

  7. Gopal B, Masing V (1990) Biology and ecology. In: Patten BC (ed) Wetlands and shallow continental water bodies, vol 1. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 91–217

  8. Hejný S, Sytnik KM (1993) Makrofity—indikatory izmenenii prirodnoi sredy. Institute of Botany, Ukrainian Academy of Science, Kyjev (in Russian)

  9. Herbst M, Kappen L (1999) The ratio of transpiration versus evaporation in a reed belt as influenced by weather conditions. Aquat Bot 63:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Květ J, Pokorný J, Čížková H (2008) Carbon accumulation by macrophytes of aquatic and wetland habitats with standing water. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B 78:91–98 (Spec Issue 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larcher W (2003) Physiological plant ecology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petr J, Černý V, Hruška V (1980) Tvorba výnosu hlavních polních plodin. SZN, Praha (in Czech)

  13. Pokorný J (2001) Dissipation of solar energy in landscape—controlled by management of water and vegetation. Renew Energy 24:641–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Procházka J, Brom J, Pechar L, Štíchová J, Pokorný J (2008) Changes in concentrations of dissolved solids in precipitation and discharge water from drained pasture, natural wetland and spruce forest during the years of 1999–2006 in Šumava Mountains, Czech Republic. In: Vymazal J (ed) Wastewater treatment, plant dynamics and management. Springer, New York, pp 39–51

  15. Procházka J, Hakrová P, Pokorný J, Pecharová E, Hezina T, Wotavová K, Šíma M, Pechar L (2001) Effect of different management practices on vegetation development, losses of soluble matter and solar energy dissipation in three small sub-mountain catchments. In: Vymazal J (ed) Transformations of nutrients in natural and constructed wetlands. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 143–175

  16. Ripl W (2003) Water: the bloodstream of the biosphere. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B358:1921–1934. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1378

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenberg VJ (1974) Microclimate: the biological environment. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. UNEP (2009) Kenya: atlas of our changing environment. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  19. Westlake DF, Květ J, Szczepański A (eds) (1998) The production ecology of wetlands: the IBP synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic (NPV 2B06023 and MSM 6007665801 and 6007665806).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Pokorný.

Appendix

Appendix

According to materials from the IPCC, the radiative forcing due to the enhanced concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has risen by 1–3 W m−2 since the start of the Industrial Revolution. According to models of climate change derived by the IPCC, the radiative forcing will increase by 0.2 W m−2 in 10 years, i.e., by 1 W m−2 in 50 years. These increases are within the range of parts per ten thousand of the solar constant, so they cannot be measured and have only been predicted by a model.

Returning water to the landscape and restoring permanent vegetation results in more effective solar energy dissipation in primary production processes (units of W m−2), reduces air pressure and temperature differences (hundreds of W m−2), slows down the rate of decomposition and thus reduces the heat released by them (units to tens of W m−2), and increases energy uptake and fixation by ecosystems and the use and dissipation of this energy by various ecosystem processes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pokorný, J., Květ, J., Rejšková, A. et al. Wetlands as energy-dissipating systems. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37, 1299–1305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0873-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0873-8

Keywords

Navigation