Abstract
Pichia pastoris was reassigned earlier to the genus Komagataella following phylogenetic analysis of gene sequences. Since that time, two additional species of Komagataella have been described, K. pseudopastoris and K. phaffii. Because these three species are unlikely to be resolved from the standard fermentation and growth tests used in yeast taxonomy, the identity of biotechnologically important strains of K. pastoris was determined from multigene sequence analyses. Results from this study show that the strain of ‘Pichia pastoris’ commonly used in gene expression studies is actually K. phaffii.
References
Cregg JM, Madden KR (1988) Development of the methylotrophic yeast, Pichia pastoris, as a host system for the production of foreign proteins. Dev Ind Microbiol 29:33–41
Cregg JM, Vedvick TS, Raschke WC (1993) Recent advances in the expression of foreign genes in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnology 11:905–910
Dlauchy D, Tornai-Lehoczki J, Fülöp L, Péter G (2003) Pichia (Komagataella) pseudopastoris sp. nov., a new yeast species from Hungary. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 83:327–332. doi:10.1023/A:1023318829389
Kurtzman CP (1984) Synonymy of the yeast genera Hansenula and Pichia demonstrated through comparisons of deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50:209–217
Kurtzman CP (1998) Pichia E.C. Hansen emend. Kurtzman. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (eds) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 273–352
Kurtzman CP (2005) Description of Komagataella phaffii sp. nov. and the transfer of Pichia pseudopastoris to the methylotrophic yeast genus Komagataella. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol 55:973–976. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63491-0
Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (1998) Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:331–371. doi:10.1023/A:1001761008817
Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the ‘Saccharomyces complex’ determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res 3:417–432. doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00012-6
Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, Basehoar-Powers E (2008) Relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene phylogenetic analysis and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res 8:939–954. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00419.x
Swofford DL (1998) PAUP* 4.0: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Wegner EH (1983) Biochemical conversions by yeast fermentation at high-cell densities. US Patent 44114329
Yamada Y, Maeda K, Mikata K (1994) The phylogenetic relationships of the hat-shaped ascospore-forming, nitrate-assimilating Pichia species, formerly classified in the genus Hansenula Sydow et Sydow, based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae): the proposals of three new genera, Ogataea, Kuraishia, and Nakazawaea. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:1245–1257
Yamada Y, Matsuda M, Maeda K, Mikata K (1995) The phylogenetic relationships of methanol-assimilating yeasts based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs: the proposal of Komagataella gen. nov. (Saccharomycetaceae). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:439–444
Acknowledgments
Christie J. Robnett is thanked for providing the gene sequences used in this study, Don Fraser for preparing the final version of Fig. 1, and David Jackson for providing a culture of the strain used in the Invitrogen Pichia pastoris Expression System. The mention of firm names or trade products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the US Department of Agriculture over other firms or similar products not mentioned.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurtzman, C.P. Biotechnological strains of Komagataella (Pichia) pastoris are Komagataella phaffii as determined from multigene sequence analysis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36, 1435–1438 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-009-0638-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-009-0638-4