Skip to main content
Log in

Selective antimicrobial action of chitosan against spoilage yeasts in mixed culture fermentations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

The effect of chitosan on Saccharomyces cerevisiae (the yeast that carries out alcohol fermentation), Brettanomyces bruxellensis and Brettanomyces intermedius (contaminants of alcohol fermentations), was investigated. The effect of chitosan was tested on each yeast, as well as on mixed cultivations of S. cerevisiae + B. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae + B. intermedius. Chitosan enhanced the lag period of both strains of Brettanomyces (80 h for B. bruxellensis and 170 h for B. intermedius with 6 and 2 g/l chitosan, respectively). The growth rate of S. cerevisiae was inversely proportional to the chitosan concentration; the former was 50% when 6 g/l polysaccharide was used. Moreover, in mixed cultivations of S. cerevisiae and Brettanomyces strains, it was found that both B. bruxellensis and B. intermedius failed to grow while growth of S. cerevisiae was not affected (using 3 and 6 g/l chitosan, respectively). An interesting collateral result was that the presence of chitosan accelerated the consumption of glucose in the mixed cultivations (60 h instead of 120 h).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3A–D

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allan C, Hadwiger L (1979) The fungicidal effect of chitosan on fungi of varying cell wall composition. Exp Mycol 3:285–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonora A, Mares D (1982) A simple colorimetric method for detecting cell viability in cultures of eucaryotic microorganisms. Curr Microbiol 7:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chatonnet P, Dubourdieu D, Boidron JN, Pons M (1992). The origin of ethylphenols in wines. J Sci Food Agric 60:165–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatonnet P, Dubourdieu D, Boidron JN (1995) The influence of BrettanomyceslDekkera sp. yeasts and lactic acid bacteria on ethylphenol content of red wines. Am J Enol Vitic 46:463–468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Délia ML, Phowchinda O, Alfenore S, Strehaiano P (1997) Brettanomyces as a polluting yeast in alcoholic fermentations: study of its relation to Saccharomyces. In: Proceedings of 18th International Specialized Symposium on Yeast, 24–29 August 1997. Bled, Slovenia

  6. Délia-Dupuy ML, de Miniac M, Phowchinda O, Strehaiano P (1995) Contamination par les levures Brettanomyces dans les fermentations alcooliques. Microbiol Aliment Nutr 13:349–359

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Miniac M (1989) Contamination des fermentations alcooliques industrielles par les levures du genre: Brettanomyces. Ind Aliment Agric 7–8:559–563

    Google Scholar 

  8. Froudière I, Larue F (1990) Conditions de survie de Brettanomyces (Dekkera) dans le moût de raisin et le vin. In: Ribereau-Gayon P, Lonvaud A (eds) Actualités oenologiques 89. Dunod, Paris, pp 297–303

  9. Heresztyn T (1986) Formation of substituted tetrahydropyridines by species of Brettanomyces and Lactobacillus isolated from mousy wines. Am J Enol Vitic 3782:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lange H, Bavouzet JM, Taillander P, Delorme C (1993) Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions. Biotechnol Tech 7:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larue F, Rozes N, Froudière I, Couty C, Ferreira GP (1991). Incidence du développement de Dekkera/Brettanomyces dans les moûts et les vins. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 25:149–165

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohtakara A, Izume M, Mitsutomi M (1988) Action of microbial chitinases on chitosan with different degrees of deacetylation. Agric Biol Chem 52:3181–3182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roller S, Covill N (1999) The antifungal properties of chitosan in laboratory media and apple juice. Int Food Microbiol 47:67–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roller S, Covill N (2000) The antimicrobial properties of chitosan in mayonnaise and mayonnaise-based shrimp salads. J Food Prot 63:202–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheffers WA (1978) The Custers effect in Brettanomyces, Dekkera and others yeasts. In: Proceedings of 6th International Specialised Symposium on Yeast. Montpellier (France) LIll 1–LIII 2

  17. Shahidi F, Vidana J, Jeon Y (1999) Food applications of chitin and chitosans. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:37–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith MT, van Grinsven AM (1984) Dekkera anomala sp nov., the teleomorph of Brettanomyces anomalus, recovered from spoiled soft drinks. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50:143–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang G (1992) Inhibition and inactivation of five species of food-borne pathogens by chitosan. J Food Prot 55:916–919

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wijsman MR, Van Kleeff JP, Scheffers WA (1984) Inhibition of fermentation and growth in batch cultures of the yeast Brettanomyces intermedius upon a shift from aerobic to anaerobic conditions. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50:183–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant 576.01-P from COSNET. H.L. Gómez-Rivas was a graduate student supported by CONACYT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blanca I. Escudero-Abarca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez-Rivas, L., Escudero-Abarca, B.I., Aguilar-Uscanga, M.G. et al. Selective antimicrobial action of chitosan against spoilage yeasts in mixed culture fermentations. J IND MICROBIOL BIOTECHNOL 31, 16–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-004-0112-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-004-0112-2

Keywords

Navigation