Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a submerged-liquid sporulation medium for the johnsongrass bioherbicide Gloeocercospora sorghi

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Submerged culture experiments were conducted in three phases to determine the optimal medium for rapidly producing conidia of the fungal bioherbicide Gloeocercospora sorghi. In phase I, 18 crude carbon sources were evaluated to determine which would support sporulation. Under the conditions tested, butter bean and lima bean brines (1.5–4.6 mS/cm) provided best conidiation. In phase II, a fractional-factorial design was utilized to screen 76 different medium adjuncts in combination with butter bean brine for improved sporulation. d-Mannitol and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) were the only acceptable factors that resulted in a significant improvement. In phase III, a central composite design with response surface methodology was used to optimize concentrations of these critical factors. The model predicted optimal sporulation in a medium composed of 2.69 mS/cm butter bean brine +0.043 M d-mannitol +0.37% w/v CMC with an expected titer of 1.51×107 conidia/ml. Actual mean titer attained with the model-derived medium was 1.91×107 conidia/ml. Optimal sporulation occurred at 25.5°C in this medium and conidia remained viable up to 2.71 days when stored at 12°C. No significant difference was observed in virulence of conidia produced on agar vs washed conidia produced in the model-derived (liquid) medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendixen L (1986) Corn (Zea mays) yield in relationship to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) population. Weed Sci 34:449–451

    Google Scholar 

  2. Box G, Draper N (1987) Introduction to response surface methodology. In: Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, New York, pp 1–19

  3. Chen H (1996) Optimizing the concentration of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in a citric acid fermentation with response surface method. Food Biotechnol 10:13–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiang M-Y, Leonard K, Van Dyke C (1989) Bipolaris halepense: a new species from Sorghum halepense (johnsongrass). Mycologia 81:532–538

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chiang M-Y, Van Dyke C, Leonard K (1989) Evaluation of endemic foliar fungi for potential biological control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense): screening and host range tests. Plant Dis 73:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  6. Churchill B (1982) Mass production of microorganisms for biological control. In: Charudattan R, Walker L (eds) Biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. Wiley, New York, pp 139–156

  7. De O Souza M, Roberto I, Milagres A (1999) Solid-state fermentation for xylanase production by Thermoascus aurantiacus using response surface methodology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:768–772

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Embuscado M, Marks J, BeMiller J (1994) Bacterial cellulose: optimization of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum through response surface methodology. Food Hydrocolloids 8:419–430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Forrester N, Geenup L, Tuart L (1975) Seasonal abundance of sorghum midge. Cotton Newslett 17:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holm L, Plucknett D, Pancho J, Herberger J (1977) Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. In: The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, pp 54–61

  11. Jackson M, Slininger P (1993) Submerged culture conidial germination and conidiation of the bioherbicide Colletotrichum truncatum are influenced by the amino acid composition of the medium. J Ind Microbiol 12:417–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishna S, Chowdary G (2000) Optimization of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. J Agric Food Chem 48:1971–1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lekha P, Chand N, Lonsane B (1994) Computerized study of interactions among factors and their optimization through response surface methodology for the production of tannin acyl hydrolase by Aspergillus niger PKL 104 under solid state fermentation. Bioprocess Eng 11:7–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDaniel L, Bailey E, Ethiraj S, Andrews H (1976) Application of response surface optimization techniques to polyene macrolide fermentation studies in shake flasks. Dev Ind Microbiol 17:91–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McWhorter C (1989) History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev Weed Sci 4:85–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell J (1988) Gibbago trianthemae, a recently described hyphomycete with bioherbicide potential for control of horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum). Plant Dis 72:354–355

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell J (1993a) Potential of Colletotrichum graminicola and Gloeocercospora sorghi as biological herbicides for control of johnsongrass. J Trends Agric Sci 1:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell J (1993b) Influence of temperature and wetness duration on johnsongrass control with Colletotrichum graminicola and Gloeocercospora sorghi. J Trends Agric Sci 1:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mortensen K (1988) The potential of an endemic fungus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, for the biological control of round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 36:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mountzouris K, Gilmour J, Rastall R (1999) A study of dextran production from maltodextrin by cell suspensions of Gluconobacter oxydans NCIB 4943. J Appl Microbiol 87:546–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rayachhetry M, Blakeslee G and R Charudattan (1996) Susceptibility of Melaleuca quinquenervia to Botryosphaeria ribis, a potential biological control agent. Plant Dis 80:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez J, Perez J, Camacho F, Sevilla J, Grima E (1996) Optimization of light and temperature for growing Chlorella sp. using response surface methodology. Biotechnol Tech 10:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saval S, Pablos L, Sanchez S (1993) Optimization of a culture medium for streptomycin production using response-surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 43:19–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sen R, Swaminathan T (1997) Application of response surface methodology to evaluate the optimum environmental conditions for the enhanced production of surfactin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47:358–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith R Jr (1982) Integration of microbial herbicides with existing pest management programs. In: Charudattan R, Walker L (eds) Biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. Wiley, New York, pp 189–206

  26. Strobel R, Sullivan G (1999) Experimental design for improvement of fermentations. In: Demain A, Davies J (eds) Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C., pp 80–93

  27. Templeton G (1982) Status of weed control with plant pathogens. In: Charudattan R, Walker L (eds) Biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. Wiley, New York, pp 29–44

  28. Williams C, Hayes R (1984) Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 32:498–501

    Google Scholar 

  29. Winder R, Van Dyke C (1990) The pathogenicity, virulence, and biocontrol potential of two Bipolaris species on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci 38:89–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James K. Mitchell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, J.K., Njalamimba-Bertsch, M., Bradford, N.R. et al. Development of a submerged-liquid sporulation medium for the johnsongrass bioherbicide Gloeocercospora sorghi . J IND MICROBIOL BIOTECHNOL 30, 599–605 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-003-0088-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-003-0088-3

Keywords

Navigation