Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of easy-to-implement methods to analyze systematic errors of multipath, differential code bias, and inter-system bias for low-cost receivers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The low-cost receiver with multi-frequency and multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations is becoming the mainstream in positioning and navigation. It is crucial to estimate systematic errors, including the multipath, differential code bias (DCB), and inter-system bias (ISB) for such receivers. The traditional analysis strategies are based on the geometry-free and ionospheric-free method, or the geometry-based and ionospheric-corrected method, whereas they cannot work all the time. Several easy-to-implement methods are discussed and analyzed, including the geometry-fixed and ionospheric-corrected method, the geometry-free and ionospheric-corrected method for multipath, the geometry-free and ionospheric-corrected method for DCB, and the geometry-fixed and ionospheric-corrected method for ISB. To mainly assess the performance of the above methods, dual-frequency and single-frequency low-cost receivers are both used. The results indicate that for the multipath, all different assessment methods have their applicable conditions, and pros and cons. The easy-to-implement methods can still work regardless of the numbers of satellites and frequencies in most cases. According to the results of the DCB and ISB, by using the traditional and convenient methods, the behaviors are highly similar, thus certifying the feasibility of the easy-to-implement methods. It can also be concluded that the multipath cannot be ignored easily in low-cost receivers due to its large magnitude, and the DCB and ISB are relatively stable over 5 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The observation data of this study are available from the corresponding author for academic purposes on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BDS:

BeiDou Navigation Satellite System

DCB:

Differential code bias

DD:

Double-differenced

DOY:

Day of year

GB:

Geometry-based

GEO:

Geostationary Earth Orbit

GF:

Geometry-free

GFix:

Geometry-fixed

GNSS:

Global Navigation Satellite System

GPS:

Global Positioning System

IC:

Ionospheric-corrected

IF:

Ionospheric-free

IGSO:

Inclined Geosynchronous Satellite Orbit

ISB:

Inter-system bias

MEO:

Medium Earth Orbit

RTK:

Real-time kinematic

STD:

Standard deviation

References

  • Caldera S, Realini E, Barzaghi R, Reguzzoni M, Sanso F (2016) Experimental study on low-cost satellite-based geodetic monitoring over short baselines. J Surv Eng 142(3):04015016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Qin H (2012) New method for single epoch, single frequency land vehicle attitude determination using low-end GPS receiver. GPS Solut 16:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Li G (2019) On the feasibility of resolving Android GNSS carrier-phase ambiguities. J Geod 93(12):2621–2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi N, Minetto A, Linty N, Dovis F (2018) A controlled-environment quality assessment of Android GNSS raw measurements. Electronics 8:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson M (2019) Characterization of GNSS observations from a Nexus 9 Android tablet. GPS Solut 23:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson M, Jensen A, Horemuz M, Hedling G (2017) Review of code and phase biases in multi-GNSS positioning. GPS Solut 21(3):849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu L, Gu Y, Huang Y, Kamijo S (2016) Urban pedestrian navigation using smartphone-based dead reckoning and 3-D map-aided GNSS. IEEE Sens J 16(5):1281–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim R, Ken S (2005) Geodetic techniques for time and frequency comparisons using GPS phase and code measurements. Metrologia 42(4):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle G, Gratton P (2019) GNSS precise point positioning with Android smartphones and comparison with high performance receivers. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on signal, information and data processing , Chongqing, December 11–13

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Geng J (2019) Characteristics of raw multi-GNSS measurement error from Google Android smart devices. GPS Solut 23:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Xiao J, Yang L (2020) Modeling and application of the time-varying GPS differential code bias between C1 and P1 observations. Adv Space Res 65(1):552–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Tu R, Han J, Zhang R, Zhang P, Fan L, Lu X (2019) Inter-system biases in GPS and BDS combined relative positioning by double-differenced observations. Meas Sci Technol 30:085001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mi X, Zhang B, Yuan Y (2019) Multi-GNSS inter-system biases: estimability analysis and impact on RTK positioning. GPS Solut 23:81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie Z, Liu F, Gao Y (2019) Real-time precise point positioning with a low-cost dual-frequency GNSS device. GPS Solut 24(1):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Teunissen P (2013) Characterization of between-receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 17(4):521–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Teunissen P, Huisman L (2012) First results of mixed GPS+GIOVE single-frequency RTK in Australia. J Spat Ence 57(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odolinski R, Teunissen P (2016) Single-frequency, dual-GNSS versus dual-frequency, single-GNSS: a low-cost and high-grade receivers GPS-BDS RTK analysis. J Geod 90(11):1255–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odolinski R, Teunissen P (2017) Low-cost, high-precision, single-frequency GPS-BDS RTK positioning. GPS Solut 21(3):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odolinski R, Teunissen P (2020) Best integer equivariant estimation: performance analysis using real data collected by low-cost, single- and dual-frequency, multi-GNSS receivers for short- to long-baseline RTK positioning. J Geod 94:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paziewski J, Sieradzki R, Baryla R (2019) Signal characterization and assessment of code GNSS positioning with low-power consumption smartphones. GPS Solut 23:98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1990) An integrity and quality control procedure for use in multi sensor integration. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international technical meeting of the Satelllite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1990), Colorado Spring, CO, September, pp 513–522

  • Teunissen P, Montenbruck O (2017) Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Yuan L, Huang D, Zhou L, Chen X, Xu S, Feng W, Gong X (2020) Analysis of the code and phase between-receiver inter-system biases of the overlapping frequencies for GPS/Galileo/BDS. Adv Space Res 65(4):1196–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Groves P, Ziebart M (2015) Smartphone shadow matching for better cross-street GNSS positioning in urban environments. J Navig 68(3):411–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L, Heßelbarth A (2020) GNSS code and carrier phase observations of a Huawei P30 smartphone: quality assessment and centimeter-accurate positioning. GPS Solut 24:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang N, Li B, Nie L, Shen Y (2020) Inter-system and inter-frequency code biases: simultaneous estimation, daily stability and applications in multi-GNSS single-frequency precise point positioning. GPS Solut 24:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng A, Yang Y, Feng M, Jing Y (2017) BDS-GPS inter-system bias of code observation and its preliminary analysis. GPS Solut 21(2):1573–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Tao X, Zhu F, Shi X, Wang F (2018) Quality assessment of GNSS observations from an Android N smartphone and positioning performance analysis using time-differenced filtering approach. GPS Solut 22:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Li B, Gao Y, Shen Y (2019) Real-time carrier phase multipath detection based on dual-frequency C/N0 data. GPS Solut 23:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42004014), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200530), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B210202109), State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics (SKLGED2020-3-8-E), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M671324), Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (2020Z412), Science and Technology Innovation Project for Overseas students in Nanjing. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for giving constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhetao Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Yuan, H., Li, B. et al. Feasibility of easy-to-implement methods to analyze systematic errors of multipath, differential code bias, and inter-system bias for low-cost receivers. GPS Solut 25, 116 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-021-01149-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-021-01149-4

Keywords

Navigation