Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kinematic precise point positioning at remote marine platforms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precise kinematic differential positioning using the global positioning system (GPS) at a marine platform usually requires a relatively short distance (e.g. <500 km) to a land-based reference station. As an alternative, precise point positioning (PPP) is normally considered free from this limiting requirement. However, due to the prerequisite of network-based satellite products, PPP at a remote marine platform may still be affected by its distance to the reference network. Hence, this paper investigates this scenario by configuring rings of reference stations with different radii centered on a to-be-positioned marine platform. Particularly, we applied ambiguity resolution at a single station to PPP by estimating uncalibrated phase delays (UPDs). We used three rings of reference stations centered on a vessel, with radii of roughly 900, 2,000 and 3,600 km, to determine satellite clocks and UPDs independently. For comparison, we also performed differential positioning based on a single reference station with baseline lengths of about 400, 1,700 and 2,800 km. We demonstrate that, despite the increasing ring-network radius to a few 1,000 km, the overall change in accuracy of the satellite clocks that are used at the vessel is smaller than 0.02 ns, and the RMS values of differences between the three sets of narrow-lane UPD estimates are around 0.05 cycles only. Moreover, the kinematic positioning accuracy of PPP is affected by the increasing ring-network radius, but can still achieve several centimeters after ambiguity resolution when the vessel is over a few 1,000 km away from the ring network, showing better performance than that of differential positioning. Therefore, we propose that ambiguity-fixed PPP can be used at remote marine platforms that support precise oceanographic and geophysical applications in open oceans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chadwell CD, Bock Y (2001) Direct estimation of absolute perceptible water in oceanic regions by GPS tracking of a coastal buoy. Geophys Res Lett 28(19):3701–3704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwell CD, Spiess FN (2008) Plate motion at the ridge-transform boundary of the south Cleft Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge from GPS-acoustic data. J Geophys Res 113:B04415. doi:10.1029/2007JB004936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo OL, Evans AG, Ando M, Tadokoro K, Sato K, Yamada T (2001) Speeding up the estimation of floated ambiguities for sub-decimetre kinematic positioning at sea. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 14th international technical meeting of the satellite division, 11–14 Sep, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2007) Bernese GPS software: Version 5.0 manual. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern (612 pp)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell P, Maul GA (2000) Marine positioning: state of technology. In: Proceedings of oceans 2000 MTS/IEEE conference and exhibition. 11–14 Sep, Providence, RI, USA

  • Gagnon K, Chadwell CD, Norabuena E (2005) Measuring the onset of locking in the Peru-Chile trench with GPS and acoustic measurements. Nature 434:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendt G, Nischan T (2005) 2003/2004 analysis coordinator report. IGS Central Bureau, Pasadena, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Teferle FN, Shi C, Meng X, Dodson AH, Liu J (2009) Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data. GPS Solut 13(4):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grejner-Brzezinska DA, Kashani I, Wielgosz P (2005) On accuracy and reliability of instantaneous network RTK as a function of network geometry, station separation, and data processing strategy. GPS Solut 9(3):212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths J, Ray JR (2009) On the precision and accuracy of IGS orbits. J Geod 83(3–4):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Rizos C (2000) Airborne GPS kinematic positioning and its application to oceanographic mapping. Earth Planets Space 52(10):819–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato T, Terada Y, Ito K, Hattori R, Abe T, Miyake T, Koshimura S, Nagai T (2005) Tsunami due to the 2004 September 5th off the Kii peninsula earthquake, Japan, recorded by a new GPS buoy. Earth Planets Space 57(4):297–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J, Springer T (2001) New IGS station and satellite clock combination. GPS Solut 4(4):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F (2007) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 20th international technical meeting of satellite division, 25–28 Sep, Fort Worth, TX, USA

  • Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, 15–19 Apr, Rockville, USA

  • Rivas MB, Maslanik JA, Sonntag JG, Axelrad P (2006) Sea ice roughness from airborne LIDAR profiles. IEEE T Geosci Remote 44(11):3032–3037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocken C, Lukes Z, Mervart L, Johnson J, Iwabuchi T, Kanzaki M (2006) Real-time ionospheric and atmospheric correction for wide area single frequency carrier phase ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 19th international technical meeting of the satellite division, 26–29 Sep, Fort Worth, TX, USA

  • Shi C, Zhao Q, Geng J, Lou Y, Ge M, Liu J (2008) Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing. In: Proceedings of the society of photographic instrumentation engineers, 7285, 72851S. doi: 10.1117/12.816261

  • Spiess FN, Chadwell CD, Hildebrand JA, Young LE, Purcell GH, Dragert H (1998) Precise GPS/acoustic positioning of seafloor reference points for tectonic studies. Phys Earth Planet In 108(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Kleusberg A (1997) GPS for Geodesy (2nd Edition). Springer-Verlag. 650 pp

  • Watson CS (2005) Satellite altimeter calibration and validation using GPS buoy technology. Dissertation. University of Tasmania

  • Zhang X, Andersen OB (2006) Surface ice flow velocity and tide retrieval of the Amery ice shelf using precise point positioning. J Geod 80(4):171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Forsberg R (2007) Assessment of long-range kinematic GPS positioning errors by comparison with airborne laser altimetry and satellite altimetry. J Geod 81(3):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the IGS community for data provision and Dr. Weiming Tang at Wuhan University for providing the vessel-borne data. Thanks also go to Wuhan University for the provision of PANDA software as collaborative research and development. Two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Geng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geng, J., Teferle, F.N., Meng, X. et al. Kinematic precise point positioning at remote marine platforms. GPS Solut 14, 343–350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0157-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0157-9

Keywords

Navigation