Skip to main content
Log in

IGS reference frames: status and future improvements

  • Review Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hierarchy of reference frames used in the International GPS Service (IGS) and the procedures and rationale for realizing them are reviewed. The Conventions of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) lag developments in the IGS in a number of important respects. Recommendations are offered for changes in the IERS Conventions to recognize geocenter motion (as already implemented by the IGS) and to enforce greater model consistency in order to achieve higher precision for combined reference frame products. Despite large improvements in the internal consistency of IGS product sets, defects remain which should be addressed in future developments. If the IGS is to remain a leader in this area, then a comprehensive, long-range strategy should be formulated and pursued to maintain and enhance the IGS reference frame, as well as to improve its delivery to users. Actions should include the official designation of a high-performance reference tracking network whose stations are expected to meet the highest standards possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002) ITRF2000: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science application. J Geophys Res 107(B10):2214. DOI 10.1029/2001JB000561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2003) The impact of a no-net-rotation condition on ITRF2000, Geophys Res Lett 30(2):1064. DOI 10.1029/2002GL016279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altamimi Z, Boucher C, Willis P (2004) Terrestrial reference frame requirements within IGGOS perspective, submitted to J Geodynamics

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt G, Lavalee D, Clarke P, Nurutdinov K (2001) A new global mode of earth deformation: seasonal cycle detected. Science 294:2342–2345

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt G, Lavalee D (2002) Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity. J Geophys Res 107(B7). DOI 10.1029/2001JB000570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouille F, Cazenave A, Lemoine JM, Cretaux J-F (2000) Geocentre motion from the DORIS space system and laser data on Lageos satellites: comparison with surface loading data. Geophys J Int 143:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong D, Yunck T, Heflin M (2003) Origin of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. J Geophys Res 108(B4):2200. DOI 10.1029/2002JB002035

    Google Scholar 

  • Eanes RJ, Kar S, Bettadapur SV, Watkins MM (1997) Low-frequency geocenter motion determined from SLR tracking (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 78(46), Fall Meeting Suppl., F146

  • Ferland R (2003) IGS00 (v2) final, IGS Mail 4666, http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsmail/2003/msg00442.html

  • Ferland R, Gendt G, Schöne T (2004) IGS reference frame maintenance, In: “Celabrating a decade of the International GPS service, IGS Workshop Proceedings, Bern: Astronomical Institute of University of Bern (in print)

  • Heflin M (2001) GPS time series data set, IGS Mail 3635, http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsmail/2001/msg00479.html

  • Kedar S, Hajj GA, Wilson BD, Heflin MB (2003) The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions. Geophys Res Lett 30(16):1829. DOI 10.1029/2003GL017639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (1995) ITRF92/ITRF93 IGS product change, IGS Mail 0824. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/ igsmail/1995/msg00002.html

  • Kouba J (1998) ITRF96 IGS product change, IGS Mail 1838. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsmail/1998/msg00065.html

  • Kouba J (2003) A guide to using International GPS Service (IGS) products. ftp://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/GuidetoUsingIGSProducts.pdf

  • Kouba J, Ray J, Watkins MM (1998) IGS Reference Frame Realization. In: IGS Analysis Center Workshop Proceedings, European Space Operations Centre, Darmstadt, pp 139–171

  • Kouba J, Springer T (2001) New IGS station and satellite clock combination. GPS Solutions 4(4):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DD, Petit G (2003) IERS Conventions 2003, IERS Technical Note 32, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie

  • Penna NT, Stewart MP (2003) Aliased tidal signatures in continuous GPS height time series. Geophys Res Lett 30(23):2184. DOI 10.1029/2003GL018828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte RM, Ray RD (2002) Atmospheric pressure corrections in geodesy and oceanography: a strategy for handling air tides. Geophys Res Lett 29(24):2153. DOI 10.1029/2002GL016340

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothacher M, Beutler G, Herring T, Weber R (1999) Estimation of nutation using the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 104(B3):4835–4860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (ed) (1999) IERS analysis campaign to investigate motions of the geocenter, IERS Technical Note 25. Observatoire de Paris, Paris

  • Ray J (2004) Reinforcing and securing the IGS reference tracking network. In: van Dam T, Francis O (eds) Proceedings of the State of GPS Vertical Positioning Precision: separation of earth Processes by Space Geodesy. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 23:1–15

  • Ray RD, Steinberg DJ, Chao BF, Cartwright DE (1994) Diurnal and semidiurnal variations in the earth’s rotation rate induced by oceanic tides. Science 264:830–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid R, Rothacher M (2003) Estimation of elevation-dependent satellite antenna phase center variations of GPS satellites. J Geodesy 77:440–446. DOI 10.1007/s00190-003-0339-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer T (2000) IGS Final orbit changes, IGS Mail 2750. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsmail/2000/msg00090.html

  • van Dam T, Plag H-P, Francis O, Gegout P (2003) GGFC Special Bureau for Loading: current status and plans. In: “Proceeding IERS Workshop on Combination Research and Global Geophysical Fluids”, IERS Tech. Note 30, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie

  • Watkins MM, Eanes RJ (1997) Observations of tidally coherent diurnal and semidiurnal variations in the geocenter. Geophys Res Lett 24(17):2231–2234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Argus DF, Heflin MB, Ivins ER, Webb FH (2002) Site distribution and aliasing effects in the inversion for load coefficients and geocenter motion from GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 29(24):2210. DOI 10.1029/2002GL016324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Heflin MB, Ivins ER, Argus DF, Webb FH (2003) Large-scale global surface mass variations inferred from GPS measurements of load-induced deformation. Geophys Res Lett 30(14):1742. DOI 10.1029/2003GL017546

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu SY, Massmann F-H, Yu Y, Reigber Ch (2003) Satellite antenna phase center offsets and scale errors in GPS solutions. J Geodesy 76:668–672. DOI 10.1007/s00190-002-0294-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102:5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply indebted to Jan Kouba for his invaluable assistance, and to Gérard Petit, Remi Ferland, Gerd Gendt, Geoff Blewitt, Peter Clarke, Tonie van Dam, Richard Ray, and Ken Senior for their advice and contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ray.

Additional information

Also published in the proceedings of the workshop and symposium “Celebrating a Decade of the International GPS Service,” Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Appendix: IGS00 stability tests

Appendix: IGS00 stability tests

Tests have been carried out in an attempt to assess the long-term stability of IGS reference frame realizations as the number of fiducial stations is varied. We start with the IGb00 frame consisting of about 99 stations (more, including some decommissioned stations). Four independent subnetworks of about 25 stations each were selected, trying to keep each equally well distributed globally. The IGS weekly SINEX files were then combined into individual long-term solutions over the period from week 999 (February 28, 1999) through 1,240 (October 18, 2003) while minimally attaching in turn each 25-station frame as a datum. Then, the Helmert parameter differences for all six possible pairs of independent realizations of IGb00 were examined. The average rate differences are shown in Table 7. The same procedure was repeated using three pairs of 50-station realizations, also shown in Table 7.

Table 7 Estimated instability in IGS global networks versus number of reference stations

Surprisingly, we found that the improvement in stability in going from 25 to 50 reference stations was very close to a factor of two. Obviously, the results could be limited by the small number of independent realizations available. Nevertheless, using the results available, we have extrapolated the apparent 1/N behavior to infer an estimated instability for the full IGb00 network, shown in the rightmost column of Table 7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ray, J., Dong, D. & Altamimi, Z. IGS reference frames: status and future improvements. GPS Solutions 8, 251–266 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-004-0110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-004-0110-x

Keywords

Navigation