Skip to main content
Log in

Aid Effectiveness, Debt Relief and Public Finance Response: Evidence from a Panel of HIPC Countries

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Substantial amounts of debt relief have been granted to a set of low-income countries, as an alternative aid modality. Although the theoretical case for debt relief is firmly established, only empirical analysis can show whether debt relief is indeed a (more) effective mode of aid delivery. We investigate the linkages between debt relief and other fiscal variables such as current expenditure, government investment, taxation and domestic borrowing, in comparison to the effects of grants and concessional loans. We find that the fiscal impact of HIPC debt relief follows fairly complex dynamics. For example, debt relief initially reduces government investment, but the effect becomes positive after two years, well outperforming other modes of aid delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arellano, M., and S. R. Bond (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berlage, L., D. Cassimon, J. Drèze, and P. Reding (2003). Prospective Aid and Indebtedness Relief: A Proposal. World Development 31 (10): 1635–1654.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birdsall, N., S. Claessens, and I. Diwan (2003). Policy Selectivity Foregone: Debt and Donor Behaviour in Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17 (3): 409–435.

  4. Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. CEMMAP Working Papers CWP09/02. Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

  5. Bulow, J., and K. Rogoff (1991). Sovereign Repurchases: No Cure for Overhang. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1219–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burnside, C., and D. Dollar (2000). Aid, Policies, and Growth. American Economic Review 90 (4): 847–868.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cassimon, D., and J. Vaessen (2007). Theory, Practice and Potential of Debt for Development Swaps in the Asian and Pacific Region. Economic Systems 31 (1): 12–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cassimon, D., and B. Van Campenhout (2006). Aid Effectiveness, Debt Relief and Public Finance Response: Evidence from a Panel of HIPC Countries. IOB-UA Working Paper 2006.02. Available at <http://www.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=.IOBE&n=37408&ct=38185&e=115146>.

  9. Chauvin, N. D., and A. Kraay (2005). What Has 100 Billion Dollars Worth of Debt Relief Done for Low-Income Countries? International Finance 0510001, EconWPA. Available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=818504>.

  10. Claessens, S., E. Detragiache, R. Kanbur, and P. Wickham (1997). HIPCs’ Debt. Review of the Issues. Journal of African Economies 6 (2): 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, D. (1996). The Sustainability of African Debt. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1621. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  12. De Grooth, A., G. Jennes, and D. Cassimon (2006). The Management of HIPC Savings in Five African Countries. In P. Bursens and P. Thijssen (eds.), Zoon Politikon: tussen effectiviteit en legitimiteit. Bruges: Vandenbroele.

  13. Fagernäs, S., and J. Roberts (2004). Fiscal Impact of Aid: A Survey of Issues and Synthesis of Country Studies of Malawi, Uganda and Zambia. ODI, ESAU Working Paper 11. Overseas Development Institute, London.

  14. Franco-Rodriguez, S., O. Morrissey, and M. McGillivray (1998). Aid and the Public Sector in Pakistan: Evidence with Endogenous Aid. World Development 26 (7): 1241–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta S., B. Clements, A. Pivovarsky, and E. Tiongson (2004). Foreign Aid and Revenue Response: Does the Composition of Aid Matter? In S. Gupta, B. Clements, and G. Inchauste (eds.), Helping Countries Develop. The Role of Fiscal Policy. Washington, D.C.: IMF.

  16. Heller, P. S. (1975). A Model of Public Fiscal Behavior in Developing Countries: Aid, Investment, and Taxation. American Economic Review 65 (3): 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heller, P. S. (2005). Understanding Fiscal Space. IMF Policy Discussion Paper PDP/05/4. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

  18. Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. S. Rosen (1988). Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica 56 (6): 1371–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  19. IDA (International Development Association) and IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2006). Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) – Status of Implementation. Washington, D.C.: IDA and IMF.

  20. IMF (International Monetary Fund) and IDA (International Development Association) (2001). Tracking of Poverty-Reducing Public Spending in Heavily Indebted Poor Countries. Washington, D.C.: IMF and IDA.

  21. Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. Forgiving a Debt Overhang. Journal of Development Economics 29 (3): 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mavrotas, G. (2002). Foreign Aid and Fiscal Response: Does Aid Aggregation Matter. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 138 (3): 534–559.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McGillivray, M., and O. Morrissey (2004). Fiscal Effects of Aid. In T. Addison and A. Roe (eds.), Fiscal Policy for Development: Poverty, Reconstruction and Growth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  24. McGillivray, M., and B. Ouattara (2005). Aid, Debt Burden and Government Fiscal Behaviour in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of African Economies 14 (2): 247–269.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ndikumana, L. (2004). Additionality of Debt Relief and Debt Forgiveness, and Implications for Future Volumes of Official Assistance. International Review of Economics and Finance 13 (3): 325–340

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  27. OED (Operations Evaluation Department) (2004). Debt Relief for the Poorest: An OED Review of the HIPC Initiative. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  28. Osei, R., O. Morrissey, and T. Lloyd (2005). The Fiscal Effects of Aid in Ghana. Journal of International Development 17 (8): 1037–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pack, H., and J. R. Pack (1993). Foreign Aid and the Question of Fungibility. Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (2): 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Renard, R. (2006). The Cracks in the New Aid Paradigm. IOB Discussion Paper 2006.01. IOB, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.

  31. Roodman, D. (2005). xtabond2: Stata Module to Extend xtabond Dynamic Panel Data Estimator. Center for Global Development, Washington, D.C. Available at <http://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s435901.htm>.

  32. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica 48 (1): 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas, A. (2006). Do Debt-Service Savings and Grants Boost Social Expenditures? IMF Working Paper 180. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

  34. Van de Walle, N., and T. Johnston (1996). Improving Aid to Africa. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council.

  35. Weeks, J., and T. McKinley (2006). Does Debt Relief Increase Fiscal Space in Zambia? The MDG Implications. International Poverty Centre Country Study 5. Brasilia: UNDP.

  36. World Bank (1998). Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t and Why. World Bank Policy Research Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  37. World Bank (2006). Debt Relief for the Poorest: An Evaluation Update of the HIPC Initiative. Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Cassimon.

Additional information

JEL no.

F34, F35, O11, O19

About this article

Cite this article

Cassimon, D., Van Campenhout, B. Aid Effectiveness, Debt Relief and Public Finance Response: Evidence from a Panel of HIPC Countries. Rev World Econ 143, 742–763 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0130-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0130-z

Keywords

Navigation