Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do Donors Target Aid in Line with the Millennium Development Goals? A Sector Perspective of Aid Allocation

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the aid portfolio of various bilateral and multilateral donors, testing whether they have prioritized aid in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Employing Tobit models that combine sectorally disaggregated aid data with various indicators reflecting the situation of recipient countries regarding the MDGs, we show that donors differ in the extent to which their sectoral aid allocation is conducive to achieving major MDGs. Some MDGs, notably the fight against HIV/AIDS, have shaped the allocation of aid. However, with respect to other MDGs such as primary education, there is a considerable gap between donor rhetoric and actual aid allocation. This invites the conclusion that the current focus on substantially increasing aid is unlikely to have the desired effects unless the targeting of aid is improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Ghaida, D., and S. Klasen (2004). The Costs of Missing the Millennium Development Goal on Gender Equity. World Development 32 (7): 1075–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agence Française de Développement, Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, U.K. Department for International Development, and The World Bank (2005). Pro-Poor Growth in the 1990s: Lessons and Insights from 14 Countries. Washington, D.C.

  3. Alesina, A., and D. Dollar (2000). Who Gives Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alesina, A., and B. Weder (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? American Economic Review 92 (4): 1126–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amprou, J., P. Guillaumont, and S. Guillaumont Jeanneney (2007). Aid Selectivity to Augmented Criteria. World Economy 30 (5): 733–763.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barro, R. J., and J.-W. Lee (2001). International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications. Oxford Economic Papers 53 (3): 541–563.

  7. Berg, A., and Z. M. Qureshi (2005). The MDGs: Building Momentum. Finance & Development 42 (3): 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berthélemy, J.-C. (2006). Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berthélemy, J.-C., and A. Tichit (2004). Bilateral Donors’ Aid Allocation Decisions: A Three-Dimensional Panel Analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance 13 (3): 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burnside, C., and D. Dollar (2000). Aid, Policies, and Growth. American Economic Review 90 (4): 847–868.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Canavire, G., P. Nunnenkamp, R. Thiele, and L. Triveño (2006). Assessing the Allocation of Aid: Developmental Concerns and the Self-Interest of Donors. Indian Economic Journal 54 (1): 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CFA (Commission for Africa) (2005). Our Common Interest. Report of the Commission for Africa. Available at <http://www.commissionforafrica.org/english/report/thereport/english/11-03-05_cr_report.pdf>.

  13. Clemens, M., S. Radelet, and R. Bhavnani (2004). Counting Chickens When They Hatch: The Short-Term Effect of Aid on Growth. Center for Global Development Working Paper 44. Washington, D.C.

  14. Collier, P., and D. Dollar (2002). Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction. European Economic Review 46 (8): 1475–1500.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Collier, P., and A. Hoeffler (2004). Aid, Policy, and Growth in Post-Conflict Societies. European Economic Review 48 (5): 1125–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalgaard, C.-J., and H. Hansen (2001). On Aid, Growth, and Good Policies. Journal of Development Studies 37 (6): 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dollar, D., and V. Levin (2006). The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2003. World Development 34 (12): 2034–2046.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dreher, A. (2004). A Public Choice Perspective of IMF and World Bank Lending and Conditionality. Public Choice 119 (3–4): 445–464.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dreher, A., and N. Jensen (2007). Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of US Interests on International Monetary Fund Conditions. Journal of Law and Economics 50 (1): 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dreher, A., P. Nunnenkamp, and R. Thiele (2006). Does US Aid Buy UN General Assembly Votes? A Disaggregated Analysis. KOF Working Paper 138. ETH Zurich.

  21. Dreher, A., J.-E. Sturm, and J. Vreeland (2006). Does Membership on the UN Security Council Influence IMF Decisions? Evidence from Panel Data. KOF Working Paper 151. ETH Zurich.

  22. Easterly, W. (2005). How to Assess the Needs for Aid? The Answer: Don’t Ask. Paper presented at the Third AFD/EUDN Conference “Financing Development: What Are the Challenges in Expanding Aid Flows?” Mimeo. Paris.

  23. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2004). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Available at <ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5650e/y5650e00.pdf>.

  24. Feyzioglu, T., V. Swaroop, and M. Zhu (1998). A Panel Data Analysis of the Fungibility of Foreign Aid. World Bank Economic Review 12 (1): 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fleck, R. K., and C. Kilby (2006). World Bank Independence: A Model and Statistical Analysis of U.S. Influence. Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 210–223.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frey, B. S., and F. Schneider (1986). Competing Models of International Lending Activities. Journal of Development Economics 20 (2): 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gates, S., and A. Hoeffler (2004). Global Aid Allocation: Are Nordic Donors Different. CSAE Working Paper 2004–34. Centre for the Study of African Economies, Oxford University.

  28. Hansen, H., and F. Tarp (2000). Aid Effectiveness Disputed. Journal of International Development 12 (3): 375–398.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen, H., and F. Tarp (2001). Aid and Growth Regressions. Journal of Development Economics 64 (2): 547–570.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harms, P., and M. Lutz (2005). The Macroeconomic Effects of Foreign Aid. In H. Ahrens (ed.), Development Cooperation – Evaluation and New Approaches. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

  31. Hudson, J., and P. Mosley (2001). Aid, Policies and Growth: In Search of the Holy Grail. Journal of International Development 13 (7): 1023–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Isenman, P., and D. Ehrenpreis (2003). Results of the OECD DAC/Development Centre Experts’ Seminar on “Aid Effectiveness and Selectivity: Integrating Multiple Objectives into Aid Allocations”. DAC Journal 4 (3): 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi (2005). Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996–2004. Policy Research Working Paper 3630. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Available at <http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance>.

  34. Kilby, C. (2006). Donor Influence in MDBs: The Case of the Asian Development Bank. Review of International Organizations 1 (2): 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kiszewski, A., A. Mellinger, A. Spielman, P. Malaney, S. Ehrlich Sachs, and J. Sachs (2004). A Global Index Representing the Stability of Malaria Transmission. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79 (5): 486–498.

  36. Mascarenhas, R., and T. Sandler (2006). Do Donors Cooperatively Fund Foreign Aid? Review of International Organizations 1 (4): 337–357.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McGillivray, M. (2003). Aid Effectiveness and Selectivity: Integrating Multiple Objectives into Aid Allocations. DAC Journal 4 (3): 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Neumayer, E. (2003). The Pattern of Giving Aid: The Impact of Good Governance on Development Assistance. Routledge Studies in Development Economics 34. London: Routledge.

  39. Neumayer, E. (2005). Is the Allocation of Food Aid Free from Donor Interest Bias? Journal of Development Studies 41 (3): 394–411.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nunnenkamp, P., and R. Thiele (2006). Targeting Aid to the Needy and Deserving: Nothing But Promises? World Economy 29 (9): 1177–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nunnenkamp, P., R. Thiele, and T. Wilfer (2005). Grants Versus Loans: Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing. Kiel Economic Policy Paper 4. Kiel Institute for World Economics, Kiel.

  42. OECD (Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation) (2006). International Development Statistics Online. Available at <http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/idsonline>.

  43. OECD and World Bank (2005). Harmonisation, Alignment, Results: Progress Report on Aid Effectiveness. Paris.

  44. Reinikka, R., and J. Svensson (2004). Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2): 679–705.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Roodman, D. (2004). An Index of Donor Performance. Center for Global Development Working Paper 42. Washington, D.C.

  46. Svensson, J. (2005). Absorption Capacity and Disbursement Constraints. Paper presented at the Third AFD/EUDN Conference “Financing Development: What Are the Challenges in Expanding Aid Flows?” Mimeo. Paris.

  47. UN (United Nations) (2005). In Larger Freedom: Towards Security, Development and Human Rights for All. Report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations for Decision by Heads of State and Government in September 2005. Available at <http://www.un.org/largerfreedom/contents.htm>.

  48. UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS) (2004). Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Table of Country-Specific HIV/AIDS Estimates and Data, End 2003. Available at <http://www.unaids.org/bangkok2004/report.html>.

  49. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2005a). Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals, Overview. UN Millennium Project. New York: United Nations.

  50. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2005b). The Sustainable Difference: Energy and Environment to Achieve the MDGs. Available at <http://www.undp.org/energyandenvironment/sustainabledifference/PDFs/SustainableDiffStatistics.pdf>.

  51. van de Walle, D., and R. Mu (2007). Fungibility and the Flypaper Effect of Project Aid. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4133. Washington, D.C.

  52. Weck-Hannemann, H., and F. Schneider (1981). Determinants of Foreign Aid under Alternative Institutional Arrangements. In: R. Vaubel and D. Willett (eds.), The Political Economy of International Organizations: A “Public Choice Approach. Boulder: Westview.

  53. WHO (World Health Organization) (2005). Global Tuberculosis Control – Surveillance, Planning, Financing. Annex 2: Country Data by WHO Region. Available at <http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2005/annex2/en/index.html>.

  54. World Bank (2005). World Development Indicators. CD-Rom. Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, D-24100, Kiel, Germany

    Rainer Thiele & Peter Nunnenkamp

  2. ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Axel Dreher

Authors
  1. Rainer Thiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Nunnenkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Axel Dreher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Nunnenkamp.

Additional information

JEL no.

F35, O11, O19

About this article

Cite this article

Thiele, R., Nunnenkamp, P. & Dreher, A. Do Donors Target Aid in Line with the Millennium Development Goals? A Sector Perspective of Aid Allocation. Rev World Econ 143, 596–630 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0124-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0124-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation