Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D Policy in an Economic Union

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What are the consequences of decentralized R&D policies within an economic union? Do non-cooperative policies generate too high R&D subsidies? To address such questions, we construct a simple model where firms invest in quality-improving R&D. With goods produced in different countries within an economic union, we compare non-cooperative and cooperative R&D policies. We show that non-cooperative policies imply too small R&D subsidies for horizontally differentiated goods and too high subsidies for close substitutes. Furthermore, small countries have less incentive to subsidize R&D than large countries, resulting in an unwarranted vertical product differentiation between goods produced in different countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagwell, K., and R. W. Staiger (1994). The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Oligopolistic Industries. Journal of International Economics 36 (December): 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brander, J. (1995). Strategic Trade Policy. In G. M. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  3. Collie, D. (2000). State Aid in the European Union: The Prohibition of Subsidies in an Integrated Market. International Journal of Industrial Organization 18 (6): 867–884.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collie, D. (2002). Prohibiting State Aid in an Integrated Market: Cournot and Bertrand Oligopolies with Differentiated Products. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 2 (3): 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin (1987). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review 78 (5): 1133–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haaland, J. I., and H. J. Kind (2004). R&D Policies, Trade and Process Innovation. SNF Working Paper 60/04. Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration, Bergen.

  7. Leahy, D., and J. P. Neary (1997). Public Policy towards R&D in Oligopolistic Industries. American Economic Review 87 (4): 642–662.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leahy, D., and J. P. Neary (2001a). Robust Rules for Industrial Policies in Open Economies. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 10 (4): 393–409.

  9. Leahy, D., and J. P. Neary (2001b). International Industrial Policy Games. Paper presented at European Economic Association’s annual meeting, 2001. Lausanne.

  10. Neary, J. P., and D. Leahy (2000). Strategic Trade and Industrial Policy towards Dynamic Oligopolies. Economic Journal 110 (April): 484–508.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park, J. H. (2001). Strategic R&D Policy under Vertically Differentiated Oligopoly. Canadian Journal of Economics 34 (4): 967–987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spencer, B. J., and J. A. Brander (1983). International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy. Review of Economic Studies 50 (4): 707–722.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Haaland.

Additional information

JEL no.

F12, F13, F15

About this article

Cite this article

Haaland, J., Kind, H. Cooperative and Non-Cooperative R&D Policy in an Economic Union. Rev. World Econ. 142, 720–745 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-006-0090-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-006-0090-8

Keywords

Navigation