Abstract
The workload of US radiologists has increased over the past two decades as measured through total annual relative value units (RVUs). This increase in RVUs generated suggests that radiologists’ productivity has increased. However, true productivity (output unit per input unit; RVU per time) is at large unknown since actual time required to interpret and report a case is rarely recorded. In this study, we analyzed how the time to read a case varies between radiologists over a set of different procedure types by retrospectively extracting reading times from PACS usage logs. Specifically, we tested two hypotheses that; i) relative variation in time to read per procedure type increases as the median time to read a procedure type increases, and ii) relative rankings in terms of median reading speed for individual radiologists are consistent across different procedure types. The results that, i) a correlation of -0.25 between the coefficient of variation and median time to read and ii) that only 12 out of 46 radiologists had consistent rankings in terms of time to read across different procedure types, show both hypotheses to be without support. The results show that workload distribution will not follow any general rule for a radiologist across all procedures or a general rule for a specific procedure across many readers. Rather the findings suggest that improved overall practice efficiency can be achieved only by taking into account radiologists’ individual productivity per procedure type when distributing unread cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hsiao WC, Braun P, Becker ER, Thomas SR: The resource-based relative value scale: toward the development of an alternative physician payment system. JAMA 258:799–802, 1987
Conoley PM, Vernon SW: Productivity of radiologists: estimates based on analysis of relative value units. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:1337–1340, 1991
Conoley PM: Productivity of radiologists in 1997: estimates based on analysis of resource-based relative value units. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:591–595, 2000
Arenson RL, Lu Y, Elliott SC, Jovais C, Avrin DE: Measuring the academic radiologist’s clinical productivity: survey results for subspecialty sections. Acad Radiol 8:524–532, 2001
Lu Y, Zhao S, Chu PW, Arenson RL: An update survey of academic radiologists’ clinical productivity. J Am Coll Radiol 31:817–26, 2008
Bhargavan M, Kaye AH, Forman HP, Sunshine JH: Workload of Radiologists in United States in 2006–2007 and Trends Since 1991–1992 1. Radiology 252:458–67, 2009
Sunshine JH, Burkhardt JH: Radiology Groups’ Workload in Relative Value Units and Factors Affecting It. Radiology 214:815–822, 2000
Eschelman DJ, Sullivan KL, Parker L, Levin DC: The relationship of clinical and academic productivity in a university hospital radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:27–31, 2000
Duszak R, Muroff LR: Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 1: clinical metrics and benchmarks. J Am Coll Radiol 7:452–458, 2010
Duszak R, Muroff LR: Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 2: beyond the clinical numbers. J Am Coll Radiol 7:482–489, 2010
Cowan IA, MacDonald SL, Floyd RA: Measuring and managing radiologist workload: Measuring radiologist reporting times using data from a Radiology Information System. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 57:558–566, 2013
Krupinski EA, MacKinnon L, Hasselbach K, Taljanovic M: Evaluating RVUs as a measure of workload for use in assessing fatigue. SPIE Proc 9416:94161A, 2015
Halsted MJ, Froehle CM: Design, implementation, and assessment of a radiology workflow management system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:321–327, 2008
Reiner B: Automating radiologist workflow, part 2: hands-free navigation. J Am Coll Radiol 30:1137–41, 2008
Forsberg D, Rosipko B, Sunshine JL: Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage. J Digit Imaging, 2016 (EPub)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
D. Forsberg is supported by a grant (2014-01422) from the Swedish Innovation Agency (VINNOVA).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forsberg, D., Rosipko, B. & Sunshine, J.L. Radiologists’ Variation of Time to Read Across Different Procedure Types. J Digit Imaging 30, 86–94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9911-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9911-z