Skip to main content
Log in

Mobile Image Interpretation: Diagnostic Performance of CT Exams Displayed on a Tablet Computer in Detecting Abdominopelvic Hemorrhage

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate whether abdominopelvic hemorrhage shown on computed tomography (CT) images can be diagnosed with the same accuracy on a tablet computer as on a dedicated reading display. One hundred patients with a clinical suspicion of abdominopelvic hemorrhage that underwent biphasic CT imaging were retrospectively read by two readers on a dedicated reading display (reference standard) and on a tablet computer (iPad Air). Reading was performed in a dedicated reading room with ambient light conditions. Image evaluation included signs of an active hemorrhage (extravasation of contrast media) and different signs indicating a condition after abdominopelvic hemorrhage (hematoma, intestinal clots, vessel stump, free abdominopelvic fluid with a mean Hounsfield unit value >20, and asymmetric muscle volume indicating intramuscular hemorrhage). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) were calculated for the tablet-based reading. Active abdominopelvic hemorrhage (n = 72) was diagnosed with the tablet computer with a sensitivity of 0.96, a specificity of 0.93, a PPV of 0.97, and an NPV of 0.90. The results for the detection of the signs indicating a condition after abdominopelvic hemorrhage range from 0.83 to 1.00 in the case of sensitivity, from 0.95 to 1.00 in the case of specificity, from 0.94 to 1.00 in the case of the PPV, and from 0.96 to 1.00 in the case of the NPV. Abdominopelvic hemorrhage shown on CT images can be diagnosed on a tablet computer with a high diagnostic accuracy allowing mobile on-call diagnoses. This may be helpful because an early and reliable diagnosis at any time is crucial for an adequate treatment strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bilbao JI, Torres E, Martínez-Cuesta: Non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: imaging and intervention in gastrointestinal hemorrhage and ischemia. Eur Radiol 12:2161–2171, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Day AC, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, ElMaraghy A, Hamilton P, McLellan B: Early detection of arterial hemorrhage in acute pelvic trauma. J Trauma 47:638–642, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Artigas JM, Martí M, Soto JA, Esteban H, Pinilla I, Guillén E: Multidetector CT angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: technique and findings. Radiographics 33:1453–1470, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park JB, Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS: An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination. J Digit Imaging 26:683–690, 2013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tewes S, Rodt T, Marquardt S, Evangelidou E, Wacker FK, von Falck C: Evaluation of the use of a tablet computer with a high-resolution display for interpreting emergency CT scans. Röfo 185:1063–1069, 2013

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson PT, Zimmerman SL, Heath D, Eng J, Horton KM, Scott WW, Fishman EK: The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 19:323–327, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Socienty for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Available at http://www.asge.org/uploadedFiles/Publications_and_Products/Practice_Guidelines/The%20Role%20of%20Endoscopy%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20obscure%20GI%20bleeding.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2014.

  8. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=37927. Accessed 9 November 2014.

  9. American College of Gastroenterology. Available at http://gi.org/guideline/management-of-the-adult-patient-with-acute-lower-gastrointestinal-hemorrhage. Accessed 9 November 2014.

  10. American College of Gastroenterology. Available at http://gi.org/guideline/management-of-patients-with-ulcer-hemorrhage. Accessed 9 November 2014.

  11. Cerva DS, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Kelly IM, Pais SO: Detection of hemorrhage in patients with major pelvic fracture: value of contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:131–135, 1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frauenfelder T, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Boehm T: Nontraumatic emergent abdominal vascular conditions: advantages of multi-detector row CT and three-dimensional imaging. Radiographics 24:481–496, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Artigas JM, Martí M, Soto JA, Esteban H, Pinilla I, Guillén E: Mulitdetector CT Angiography for acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage: techniques and findings. Radiographics 33:1453–1470, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dondelinger RF, Trotteur G, Ghaye B, Szapiro D: Traumatic injuries: radiological hemostatic intervention at admission. Eur Radiol 12:979–993, 2002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Sover ER: Value of contrast-enhanced CT in detecting active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal or pelvic trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:65–69, 1993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira SJ, O'Brien DP, Luchette FA, Choe KA, Lim E, Davis Jr, K, Hurst JM, Johannigman JA, Frame SB: Dynamic helical computed tomography scan accurately detects hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. Surgery 128:678–685, 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aertsen M, Termote B, Souverijns G, Vanrusselt J: The critical role of CT angiography in the detection and therapy of lower gastro-intestinal hemorrhage. JBR-BTR 96:78–80, 2013

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammon M, Schlechtweg PM, Schulz-Wendtland R, Uder M, Schwab SA: iPads in breast imaging—a phantom study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74:152–156, 2014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mc Laughlin P, Neill SO, Fanning N, Mc Garrigle AM, Connor OJ, Wyse G, Maher MM: Emergency CT brain: preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad. Emerg Radiol 19:127–133, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McNulty JP, Ryan JT, Evanoff MG, Rainford LA: Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study. Acad Radiol 19:1023–1028, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. John S, Poh AC, Lim TC, Chan EH, le Chong R: The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting. J Digit Imaging 25:628–634, 2012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our patients, the Editors of the Journal of Digital Imaging and those who reviewed this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Hammon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlechtweg, P.M., Kammerer, F.J., Seuss, H. et al. Mobile Image Interpretation: Diagnostic Performance of CT Exams Displayed on a Tablet Computer in Detecting Abdominopelvic Hemorrhage. J Digit Imaging 29, 183–188 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9829-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9829-x

Keywords

Navigation